1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Errors in ram velocity and temperature measurements inferred from satellite-borne retarding potential analyzers
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2936270
/content/aip/journal/pop/15/6/10.1063/1.2936270
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/15/6/10.1063/1.2936270
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Diagram of the retarding potential analyzer (RPA). The dual retarding grids (G2) act as the energy filter. The instrument moves to the left, leading to a net flow of particles into the RPA.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Two different geometric arrangements of a double-grid energy filter. The grids in model A are perfectly aligned, giving it the optical transparency of the first grid. The second grid in model B is offset in each direction, giving it a lower optical transparency than model A. Both models have a periodic symmetry over one grid cell in the second grid.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Simulation of ion tracks for three different energies through a real energy filter using ANSYS®. The RV grids that comprise the energy filter are perfectly aligned. The vertical lines represent the grid planes in the RPA. G1 and G3 are modeled as idealized grids, while G2 is modeled with real flat wires. The circles on G2 mark the location grid wires normal to the plane of the plot (the circle diameter is much larger than the actual wire diameter for purposes of illustration). The plot is positioned symmetrically, equidistant between two vertical wires out of the plane of the plot in the left G2 grid. The grid alignment is based on model A (see Fig. 2).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Transmission ratios for ions with velocities normal to the grid plane compared to the ideal assumptions for three different energy filter models and for different suppression voltages. The maximum optical transparency is used for the ideal case.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Transmission ratios for the two double-grid energy filter models. The notches are due to the lensing effects of the grids and the relative locations of the grid wires. A suppression voltage of is used for both models.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Sample simulated curves for a 3D drifting Maxwellian distribution of using the ideal analytic expression and the two simulation models. The temperature, composition, and ram velocity are representative of low Earth orbit conditions.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Inferred ram velocities and ion temperatures from least-squares fit of simulated curves and the ideal expression as a function of input temperature. All simulated data are for an input drift velocity of .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pop/15/6/10.1063/1.2936270
2008-06-24
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Errors in ram velocity and temperature measurements inferred from satellite-borne retarding potential analyzers
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/15/6/10.1063/1.2936270
10.1063/1.2936270
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM