1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
oa
Direct drive heavy-ion-beam inertial fusion at high coupling efficiency
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aip/journal/pop/15/7/10.1063/1.2950303
1.
1.J. Nuckolls, L. Wood, A. Thiessen, and G. Zimmerman, Nature (London) 239, 139 (1972).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/239139a0
2.
2.J. D. Lindl, Inertial Confinement Fusion: The Quest for Ignition and Energy Gain Using Indirect Drive (AIP, Melville, New York, 1998).
3.
3.G. Allshouse and D. Callahan, Nucl. Fusion 39, 885 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/39/7/306
4.
4.D. Callahan and M. Tabak, Phys. Plasmas, 7, 2083 (2000).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.874031
5.
5.N. Metzler and J. Meyer-Ter-Vehn, Laser Part. Beams 2, 27 (1984).
6.
6.K. A. Long and N. A. Tahir, Phys. Rev. A 35, 2631 (1987).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.35.2631
7.
7.T. Someya, K. Miyazawa, T. Kikuchi, and S. Kawata, Laser Part. Beams 24, 359 (2006).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0263034606060526
8.
8.S. Atzeni and J. Meyer-Ter-Vehn, The Physics of Inertial Fusion (Clarendon, Oxford, 2004), p. 233.
9.
9.R. O. Bangerter and D. J. Meeker, “Charged particle fusion targets,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Topical Conference on High Power Electron and Ion Beam Research, Ithaca, New York, October 3-5, 1977;
9.R. O. Bangerter and D. J. Meeker, See National Information Technical Service Document No. UCRL-79875 (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report No. UCRL–79875, 1977. Copies may be ordered from National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.
10.
10.G. B. Zimmerman, W. L. Kruer, Comments Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 2, 51 (1975).
10.Most recent updates were provided by T. Kaiser, G. Kerbel, and M. Prasad, private communication (2005).
11.
11.G. R. Magelssen, Nucl. Fusion 24, 1527 (1984).
12.
12.D. Havazelet, M. Sapir, and T. Bar-Noy, J. Phys. D 16, 315 (1983).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/16/3/015
13.
13.P. K. Roy, S. S. Yu, E. Henestroza, A. Anders, F. M. Bieniosek, J. Coleman, S. Eylon, W. G. Greenway, M. Leitner, B. G. Logan, W. L. Waldron, D. R. Welch, C. Thoma, A. B. Sefkow, E. P. Gilson, P. C. Efthimion, and R. C. Davidson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 234801 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.234801
14.
14.T. Kaiser, G. Kerbel, and M. Prasad, unpublished LLNL presentation “Implementing ion beams in Kull and Hydra,” 1999;
14.see also, e.g., S. Atzeni and J. Meyer-Ter-Vehn, The Physics of Inertial Fusion (Clarendon, Oxford, 2004), p. 389.
15.
15.A. R. Piriz, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 28, 1167 (1986).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/28/8/009
16.
16.J. D. Lindl, Phys. Plasmas 11, 339 (2004).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1578638
17.
17.M. Tabak, Nucl. Fusion 36, 147 (1996).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/36/2/I03
18.
18.S. Atzeni and C. Ciampi, Nucl. Fusion 37, 1665 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/37/12/I01
19.
19.R. Sacks, R. Arnold, and G. Magelssen, Nucl. Fusion 22, 1421 (1982).
20.
20.S. Kawata and K. Niu, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 53, 3416 (1984).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.53.3416
21.
21.B. Sharkov, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 577, 14 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.02.006
22.
22.Kawata has suggested that nonuniform and time varying accelerations such as induced by beam spot rotation and multipulsing in time may reduce the RT growth rates; see linear RT growth analysis in S. Kawata, T. Sato, T. Teramoto, E. Bandoh, Y. Masubuchi, H. Watanabe, and I. Takahahsi, Laser Part. Beams 11, 757 (1993).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/15/7/10.1063/1.2950303
Loading
/content/aip/journal/pop/15/7/10.1063/1.2950303
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pop/15/7/10.1063/1.2950303
2008-07-09
2015-01-25

Abstract

Issues with coupling efficiency, beam illumination symmetry, and Rayleigh-Taylor instability are discussed for spherical heavy-ion-beam-driven targets with and without hohlraums. Efficient coupling of heavy-ion beams to compress direct-drive inertial fusion targets without hohlraums is found to require ion range increasing several-fold during the drive pulse. One-dimensional implosion calculations using the LASNEX inertial confinement fusion target physics code shows the ion range increasing fourfold during the drive pulse to keep ion energy deposition following closely behind the imploding ablation front, resulting in high coupling efficiencies (shell kinetic energy/incident beamenergy of 16% to 18%). Ways to increase beam ion range while mitigating Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities are discussed for future work.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/pop/15/7/1.2950303.html;jsessionid=1asuofh9iih29.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/aip/journal/pop/15/7/10.1063/1.2950303&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/pop
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Direct drive heavy-ion-beam inertial fusion at high coupling efficiency
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/15/7/10.1063/1.2950303
10.1063/1.2950303
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM