1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Analysis of aftercavity interaction in gyrotrons
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3072978
/content/aip/journal/pop/16/2/10.1063/1.3072978
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/16/2/10.1063/1.3072978
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic representation of axial profiles of the magnetic field (top), waveguide wall, and electron beam in the gyrotron after cavity region.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Dispersion diagrams illustrating the cyclotron resonance interaction in the cavity (solid lines) and after cavity (dashed lines).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The coupling coefficient for the -mode as the function of the ratio of the electron guiding center radius to the cavity wall radius.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The axial dependence of the cyclotron resonance detuning in the aftercavity region. (a) and (b) correspond to different values of the magnetic field tapering parameter, (a) and (b).

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Axial dependence of the shift in the ratio of the electron guiding center radius to the wall radius for two values of the magnetic field tapering parameter, (a) and (b).

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

The dependence of the optimal wall tapering parameter discriminating the aftercavity interaction (solid line) and the axial coordinate of the aftercavity interaction region (dashed line) as functions of the magnetic field tapering parameter.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Axial dependence of the transit angle advance in the aftercavity region for two values of the magnetic field tapering parameter, (a) and (b).

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

(a) Axial dependence of the efficiency in the original version of a design; (b) gyrotron efficiency as the function of the magnetic field tapering parameter at the cavity exit and after launcher; solid lines show results for an ideal beam, dashed lines show results for a beam with 5% spread in electron orbital velocities; (c) axial dependence of the gyrotron efficiency for a beam with and without electron velocity spread.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Histograms characterizing the energy distribution in a spent beam in three cross sections: (a) the end of a cavity, , (b) the end of the uptaper, , and (c) the end of a launcher . Calculations are done for an ideal beam (no spread in electron velocities at the entrance).

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

The same histograms as in Fig. 9. Calculations are done for a beam with 5% RMS spread in electron orbital velocities at the cavity entrance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pop/16/2/10.1063/1.3072978
2009-02-05
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Analysis of aftercavity interaction in gyrotrons
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/16/2/10.1063/1.3072978
10.1063/1.3072978
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM