1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Monte Carlo study of melting in a finite two-dimensional dusty plasma
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3205882
/content/aip/journal/pop/16/8/10.1063/1.3205882
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/16/8/10.1063/1.3205882
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Experimentally measured [(a)–(c)] and computed [(d)–(f)] particle configurations in a 2D dusty plasma, matched for defect fraction. Larger dots show lattice defects inside the circle , dark gray (blue online) for particles with five nearest neighbors and light gray (red online) for seven neighbors. Experimentally measured configurations previously identified (Ref. 7) as (a) 1.6% amplitude modulation, “hot” crystal, (b) 2.2% a.m., hexatic phase and (c) 2.8% a.m., liquid. Computed configurations, identified as (d) , hot crystal, (e) , hexatic phase, and (f) , liquid phase.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Pair correlation functions for values of the coupling parameter spanning the melting transition. Successive curves are each shifted downward by 1/2. The translational correlation length decreases abruptly between and 77.7, indicating a transition from a crystalline phase to a hexatic phase.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Bond-orientational correlation function plotted on (a) linear axes and (b) semilog axes. Three distinct regimes can be seen. For the system displays a roughly linear decay in . For and 69.9 the decay goes as , as shown by the dashed line. For the decay is exponential. Symbols are experimentally measured curves (Ref. 7) for amplitude modulation levels of 1.6% (diamonds), 2.2% (circles), and 2.8% (triangles).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) Dependence of fraction of defects on the coupling parameter , where a defect is defined as a particle with five or seven nearest neighbors. (b) The average lattice constant and rms variation in the lattice constant vs . Note the suppressed zero on the left vertical axis, so that varies by only .

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(a) Translation and orientational correlation lengths and , respectively, vs the coupling parameter . Here undergoes an abrupt decrease for the crystal-to-hexatic transition, indicating a loss of translational order, while undergoes an abrupt decrease for the hexatic-to-liquid transition, indicating the loss of orientational order. (b) Average value of the bond orientational correlation function [Eq. (14)] vs , plotted on semilog axes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pop/16/8/10.1063/1.3205882
2009-08-17
2014-04-17
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Monte Carlo study of melting in a finite two-dimensional dusty plasma
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/16/8/10.1063/1.3205882
10.1063/1.3205882
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM