1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Scales of guide field reconnection at the hydrogen mass ratio
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3467503
/content/aip/journal/pop/17/8/10.1063/1.3467503
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/17/8/10.1063/1.3467503

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Field lines visualized in 3D. The color represents the -component of the magnetic field. Two views are presented to help the viewer to imagine the true 3D structure. The top view is from above while the bottom view is frontal but slightly tilted.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Electron charge density of the background superimposed with the intersection of the magnetic surfaces (projection of the magnetic field lines on the page, computed as the contour lines of the out of plane vector potential). Only the electrons initially in the background plasma are contributing to the density shown. Note that the color scale is inverted with blue indicating the higher density in absolute value (the electron charge density is negative). Four times are shown. Simulation with , , , and .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Electron velocity normalized to the local thermal speed . Note that the figure shows only the central part of the domain to make the features more visible. The complete box size is (see Fig. 6 for the full domain).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Parallel electric field , normalized as . Note that the figure shows only the central part of the domain to make the features more visible. The complete box size is (see Fig. 6 for the full domain).

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Electron parallel velocity normalized to the local electron thermal velocity and parallel electric field . Panel (a) shows the contour lines of and in false color. Vice versa in panel (b). The parallel electric field is normalized as . Only the top left quadrant of the computational domain is shown and the axes have been shifted to be centered with the center of the simulation box.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Electron background density , parallel electron velocity normalized to the local thermal velocity and parallel electric field for the three different mass ratios.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Detail of electron holes in the parallel electric field. Comparison of the case with [(a) and (d)], [(b) and (e)], and [(c) and (f)]. On the left [panels (a)–(c)] the blow up of the inset displayed in the right panels [(d)–(f)] is shown. The left panels are scaled to the respective initial electron skin depth computed based on the initial peak density in the Harris sheet. A red circle of the same size is added in each of the left panels. The size is chosen to be the same as that of the electron holes displayed, showing that the electron holes have the same size at all mass ratio and that this size is approximately that once rescaled to the local electron skin depth due to the reduced density in the cavities is or .

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Local grid spacing (equal in both directions and ) measured in terms of the local electron skin depth . Run with .

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Comparison of two box sizes ( on the left, on the right) for two runs with the standard parameter and mass ratio . The top panels show the electron flow speed normalized to the local thermal speed and the bottom panels show the parallel electric field. Note that for the larger box (right panels) only the central part of the simulation box is displayed.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Comparison of periodic (left panels) and semiopen boundary conditions (right panels) for two runs with the standard parameter and mass ratio . The top panels show the electron flow speed normalized to the local thermal speed and the bottom panels show the parallel electric field.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Mass ratio, time step, and grid resolution of the simulations.

Generic image for table
Table II.

Mass ratio study. Scaling of the Alfvén speed and gain obtained by the use of the implicit moment method. By comparison, in the real Earth magnetotail, the typical value of is around 300.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pop/17/8/10.1063/1.3467503
2010-08-16
2014-04-17
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Scales of guide field reconnection at the hydrogen mass ratio
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/17/8/10.1063/1.3467503
10.1063/1.3467503
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM