1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The various manifestations of collisionless dissipation in wave propagation
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4729664
/content/aip/journal/pop/19/6/10.1063/1.4729664
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/19/6/10.1063/1.4729664

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Space portrait of electrons acted upon by an electrostatic wave and with initial distribution function , where is a function with very small width . (a) The wave amplitude is zero. (b) The wave has grown slowly enough to induce nearly adiabatic motion and has trapped the electrons which, due to action conservation, all lie on very close orbits. (c) In the limit when the periods of the trapped orbits are infinitely small compared to the typical timescale of variation on the EPW amplitude, when this wave decays, half electrons are detrapped with and half with . Then, again due to action conservation, when the EPW amplitude has decreased back to zero the distribution function is .

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Space profile of the plasma wave (in arbitrary units), at time (black solid line) and at time (blue dashed line), when the group velocity of the wave packet (whose amplitude is indicated by the arrows) decreases with the EPW amplitude at the rear side, and remains fixed at its minimum nonlinear value at the front side. One clearly sees that the wave packet at time is narrower than at time .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Results obtained with BRAMA, at time  ps, showing the profiles of: panel (a), ; panel (b), the transverse component of the group velocity, , induced by collisionless dissipation, and normalized to the modulus of the group velocity, ; panel (c), the total transverse component, , of the EPW group velocity, normalized to ; panel (d), the collisionless damping rate normalized to its linear value. At time  ps, when the damping rate is still significant compared to its linear value, , and the variations of tend to increase the transverse size of the wave packet.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Same as Fig. 3 but at time  ps. As in Fig. 3, the global effect of the group velocity is to increase the transverse extent of the wave packet. Note that, in spite of this, the transverse profile of the plasma wave packet has shrunk compared to the previous figure because of the inhomogeneity of the SRS growth rate (the same would have occurred for a freely propagating wave because of the inhomogeneity of the collisionless damping rate).

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Same as Fig. 3 but at time  ps, when Landau damping has nearly vanished. At this time, the focussing effect due to wave front bowing prevails near the axis and at the front side of the wave packet.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Same as Fig. 3 but at time  ps, when the component due to dissipation has changed sign close to the axis and at the front side of the wave packet, which keeps on focussing more rapidly. Note the change in shape of the EPW profile between Figs. 5 and 6, resulting from the focussing of the front side.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Acronyms and notations used in this paper.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pop/19/6/10.1063/1.4729664
2012-06-20
2014-04-17
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: The various manifestations of collisionless dissipation in wave propagation
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/19/6/10.1063/1.4729664
10.1063/1.4729664
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM