No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The interaction of researchers with teachers: What scientists can offer elementary and secondary schools
1.B. B. Schwartz and J. J. Wynne, Phys. Today 44(9), 48 (1991).
2.Precollege Math and Science Education: Department of Energy’s Precollege Program Managed Ineffectively, Report to the Chairman, Senate Committee on Government Affairs (United States General Accounting Office, Washington, DC, 1994), GAO/HEHS-94-208, and references therein.
3.Educating Americans for the 21st Century, Commission on Precollege Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (National Science Board, Washington, DC, 1983), p. 1.
4.A Nation at Risk: The Importance of Educational Reform, National Commission on Excellence in Education (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1983).
5.Gallop Poll quoted in J. Schwartz, “Technology’s Magic Can’t Make Pseudoscience Disappear,” Washington Post, October 31, 1994 (Washington, DC, 1994), p. A3.
6.George Bush, President of the United States, National Education Goals, (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1989).
7.E. Culotta, Science 265, 1648 (1994).
8.Science Achievement in Seventeen Countries: A Preliminary Report, International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (Pergamon, New York, 1988).
9.Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Education, Issue Brief (Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC, 1992).
10.Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, Commission on Standards for School Mathematics (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, 1989).
11.Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics, Commission on Standards for School Mathematics (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA, 1991).
12.F. J. Rutherford and A. Ahlgren, Science for All Americans (Oxford University Press, New York, 1990).
13.American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project 2061, Benchmarks for Science Literacy (Oxford University Press, New York, 1993).
14.A. Ahlgren and F. J. Rutherford, Educational Leadership, May 1993, pp. 19–22.
15.Scope, Sequence, and Coordination of Secondary School Mathematics: The Content Core (National Science Teachers Association, Washington, DC, 1992), Vol. 1.
16.Science for Children: Resources for Teachers, National Science Resources Center (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1988).
17.Everybody Counts: A Report to the National on the Future of Mathematics Education, Mathematical Sciences Education Board, National Research Council (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1989).
18.National Education Standards: A Working Paper, National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment (National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1993), p. 1.
19.Reshaping School Mathematical Science Education Board, National Research Council, Mathematics (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1990).
20.R. D. Klausner and the National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment, Draft National Science Education Studies (National Research Council, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, November 1994).
21.J. P. Mestre, Phys. Today 44(9), 56 (1991), and references therein.
22.“Getting started in science: A blueprint for elementary school science education,” National Center for Improving Science Education, 3rd ed. (The Network, Andover, MA, 1989).
23.F. M. Betts, Science Education (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA, 1994), and references therein.
24.G. L. Salinger, Phys. Today 44, 39 (1991).
25.U. Haber-Schaim and the Physical Science Study Committee, PSSC Physics (DC Health, Lexington, MA, 1971);
25.R. J. Rutherford, G. Holton, and F. Watson, The Project Physics (Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, New York, 1970).
26.Quoted in T. P. Sachse, Curriculum Assumptions Underlying the Current Reforms in Science Education (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA, 1994).
27.Editorial, “Public Schools Can’t Deliver Science Education Alone,” Los Angeles Times, July 5, 1994.
28.C. Swartz, Phys. Today 44(9), 22 (1991).
29.J. D. Bower, “Scientists and science education reform: Myths, methods, and madness,” in Scientists, Educators, and National Standards: Action at the Local Level (Sigma Xi, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1994), p. 123.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month
Most cited this month