1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
oa
Injection and transport properties of fast electrons in ultraintense laser-solid interactions
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/aip/journal/pop/20/4/10.1063/1.4799726
1.
1. M. Tabak, J. Hammer, M. E. Glinsky, W. L. Kruer, S. C. Wilks, J. Woodworth, E. M. Campbell, M. D. Perry, and R. J. Mason, Phys. Plasmas 1, 16261634 (1994).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.870664
2.
2. H. Schwoerer, P. Gibbon, S. Düsterer, R. Behrens, C. Ziener, C. Reich, and R. Sauerbrey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 23172320 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2317
3.
3. S. C. Wilks, A. B. Langdon, T. E. Cowan, M. Roth, M. Singh, S. Hatchett, M. H. Key, D. Pennington, A. Mackinnon, and R. A. Snavely, Phys. Plasmas 8, 542 (2001).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1333697
4.
4. A. R. Bell and R. J. Kingham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 035003 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.035003
5.
5. J. J. Honrubia and J. Meyer ter Vehn, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 51, 014008 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/51/1/014008
6.
6. L. Gremillet, F. Amiranoff, S. D. Baton, J.-C. Gauthier, M. Koenig, E. Martinolli, F. Pisani, G. Bonnaud, C. Lebourg, C. Rousseaux, C. Toupin, A. Antonicci, D. Batani, A. Bernardinello, T. Hall, D. Scott, P. Norreys, H. Bandulet, and H. Pépin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 50155018 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5015
7.
7. M. Borghesi, A. J. Mackinnon, A. R. Bell, G. Malka, C. Vickers, O. Willi, J. R. Davies, A. Pukhov, and J. Meyer-ter-Vehn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 43094312 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4309
8.
8. K. L. Lancaster, J. S. Green, D. S. Hey, K. U. Akli, J. R. Davies, R. J. Clarke, R. R. Freeman, H. Habara, M. H. Key, R. Kodama, K. Krushelnick, C. D. Murphy, M. Nakatsutsumi, P. Simpson, R. Stephens, C. Stoeckl, T. Yabuuchi, M. Zepf, and P. A. Norreys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 125002 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.125002
9.
9. J. S. Green, V. M. Ovchinnikov, R. G. Evans, K. U. Akli, H. Azechi, F. N. Beg, C. Bellei, R. R. Freeman, H. Habara, R. Heathcote, M. H. Key, J. A. King, K. L. Lancaster, N. C. Lopes, T. Ma, A. J. MacKinnon, K. Markey, A. McPhee, Z. Najmudin, P. Nilson, R. Onofrei, R. Stephens, K. Takeda, K. A. Tanaka, W. Theobald, T. Tanimoto, J. Waugh, L. Van Woerkom, N. C. Woolsey, M. Zepf, J. R. Davies, and P. A. Norreys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 015003 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.015003
10.
10. V. M. Ovchinnikov, D. W. Schumacher, M. McMahon, E. A. Chowdhury, C. D. Chen, A. Morace and R. R. Freeman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 065007 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.065007
11.
11. R. H. H. Scott, F. Perez, J. J. Santos, C. P. Ridgers, J. R. Davies, K. L. Lancaster, S. D. Baton, Ph. Nicolaï, R. M. G. M. Trines, A. R. Bell, S. Hulin, M. Tzoufras, S. J. Rose, and P. A. Norreys, Phys. Plasmas 19, 053104 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4714615
12.
12. J. R. Davies, A. R. Bell, and M. Tatarakis, Phys. Rev. E 59, 6032 (1999).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.59.6032
13.
13. A. A. Solodov, M. Storm, J. F. Myatt, R. Betti, D. D. Meyerhofer, P. M. Nilson, W. Theobald, and C. Stoeckl, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 244, 022063 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/244/2/022063
14.
14. X. H. Yuan, A. P. L. Robinson, M. N. Quinn, D. C. Carroll, M. Borghesi, R. J. Clarke, R. G. Evans, J. Fuchs, P. Gallegos, L. Lancia, D. Neely, K. Quinn, L. Romagnani, G. Sarri, P. A. Wilson, and P. McKenna, New J. Phys. 12, 063018 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/6/063018
15.
15. A. P. L. Robinson and M. Sherlock, Phys. Plasmas 14, 083105 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2768317
16.
16. A. P. L. Robinson, M. Sherlock, and P. A. Norreys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 025002 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.025002
17.
17. S. Kar, A. P. L. Robinson, D. C. Carroll, O. Lundh, K. Markey, P. McKenna, P. Norreys, and M. Zepf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 055001 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.055001
18.
18. B. Ramakrishna, S. Kar, A. P. L. Robinson, D. J. Adams, K. Markey, M. N. Quinn, X. H. Yuan, P. McKenna, K. L. Lancaster, J. S. Green, R. H. H. Scott, P. A. Norreys, J. Schreiber, and M. Zepf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 135001 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.135001
19.
19. A. P. L. Robinson, M. H. Key, and M. Tabak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 125004 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.125004
20.
20. R. H. H. Scott, C. Beaucourt, H.-P. Schlenvoigt, K. Markey, K. L. Lancaster, C. P. Ridgers, C. M. Brenner, J. Pasley, R. J. Gray, I. O. Musgrave, A. P. L. Robinson, K. Li, M. M. Notley, J. R. Davies, S. D. Baton, J. J. Santos, J.-L. Feugeas, Ph. Nicolaï, G. Malka, V. T. Tikhonchuk, P. McKenna, D. Neely, S. J. Rose, and P. A. Norreys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 015001 (2012).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.015001
21.
21. P. McKenna, D. C. Carroll, R. J. Clarke, R. G. Evans, K. W. D. Ledingham, F. Lindau, O. Lundh, T. McCanny, D. Neely, A. P. L. Robinson, L. Robson, P. T. Simpson, C.-G. Wahlström, and M. Zepf, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 145001 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.145001
22.
22. M. N. Quinn, X. H. Yuan, X. X. Lin, D. C. Carroll, O. Tresca, R. J. Gray, M. Coury, C. Li, Y. T. Li, C. M. Brenner, A. P. L. Robinson, D. Neely, B. Zielbauer, B. Aurand, J. Fils, T. Kuehl, and P. McKenna, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 53, 025007 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/53/2/025007
23.
23. J. A. Koch, O. L. Landen, T. W. Barbee, P. Celliers, L. B. Da Silva, S. G. Glendinning, B. A. Hammel, D. H. Kalantar, C. Brown, J. Seely, G. R. Bennett, and W. Hsing, Appl. Opt. 37, 17841795 (1998).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.37.001784
24.
24. J. A. King, K. Akli, B. Zhang, R. R. Freeman, M. H. Key, C. D. Chen, S. P. Hatchett, J. A. Koch, A. J. MacKinnon, P. K. Patel, R. Snavely, R. P. J. Town, M. Borghesi, L. Romagnani, M. Zepf, T. Cowan, H. Habara, R. Kodama, Y. Toyama, S. Karsch, K. Lancaster, C. Murphy, and P. Norreys, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 191501 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1923178
25.
25. F. Nürnberg, M. Schollmeier, E. Brambrink, A. Blažević, D. C. Carroll, K. Flippo, D. C. Gautier, M. Geißel, K. Harres, B. M. Hegelich, O. Lundh, K. Markey, P. McKenna, D. Neely, J. Schreiber, and M. Roth, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 033301 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3086424
26.
26. P. Mora, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 185002 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.185002
27.
27. S. C. Wilks and W. L. Kruer, IEEE J. Quantum Electron 33, 19541968 (1997).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/3.641310
28.
28. J. R. Davies, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 51, 014006 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/51/1/014006
29.
29. P. McKenna, D. C. Carroll, O. Lundh, F. Nürnberg, K. Markey, S. Bandyopadhyay, D. Batani, R. G. Evans, R. Jafer, S. Kara, D. Neely, D. Pepler, M. N. Quinn, R. Redaelli, M. Roth, C.-G. Wahlström, X. H. Yuan, and M. Zepf, Laser Part. Beams 26, 591596 (2008).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0263034608000657
30.
30. P. McKenna, A. P. L. Robinson, D. Neely, M. P. Desjarlais, D. C. Carroll, M. N. Quinn, X. H. Yuan, C. M. Brenner, M. Bursa, M. Coury, P. Gallegos, R. J. Gray, K. L. Lancaster, Y. T. Li, X. X. Lin, O. Tresca, and C.-G. Wahlström, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 185004 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.185004
31.
31. C. I. Moore, J. P. Knauer, and D. D. Meyerhofer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 24392442 (1995).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.2439
32.
32. J. R. Davies, Phys. Rev. E 65, 026407 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.65.026407
33.
33. H. M. Milchberg, R. R. Freeman, S. C. Davey, and R. M. More, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 23642367 (1988).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2364
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/20/4/10.1063/1.4799726
Loading
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.

Click to view

FIG. 1.

(a) Measured lateral extent of Cu Kα emission, half-width-at-half-maximum (HWHM), as a function of target thickness (front Al transport layer), . Black symbols are data from the present experiment (Al-Cu-Al). Red symbols are measurements made with similar laser pulse parameters on Cu targets, reproduced from Lancaster 8 (b) Maximum proton energy, , as a function of target thickness. Black squares are data from the present experiment (Al-Cu-Al) and white squares are measurements made with similar laser pulse parameters and Al targets, reproduced from Yuan 14 Blue circles are theoretical estimates of , calculated using a plasma expansion model together with estimates of the rear-surface fast electron density inferred from the Cu Kα measurements shown in (a). See main text for details.

Image of FIG. 2.

Click to view

FIG. 2.

(a) Fast electron beam injection half-angle as a function of electron energy. The dashed black curve is the distribution function derived by Moore , 31 in which , where γ is the electron Lorentz factor and with giving a mean half-angle in the example shown. The red line corresponds to electrons injected uniformly within a cone with half-angle equal to at all electron energies. The green curve is the initial fast electron energy spectrum for a beam temperature of 6 MeV; (b) Example temporal evolution profile of the maximum fast electron density at the target rear side, extracted from a hybrid-PIC simulation of electron transport within a 200 m-thick target, with ; (c) Fast electron energy spectra extracted from the hybrid simulations at the front side ("initial spectrum") and rear side of 100 m and 200 m-thick targets. The dashed line is a Boltzmann distribution with  = 6 MeV.

Image of FIG. 3.

Click to view

FIG. 3.

(a) Fast electron density at the target rear side, averaged over the temporal peak, as a function of target thickness , extracted from the hybrid simulations, for given ; (b) Corresponding ion acceleration time, extracted from the FWHM temporal width of the density peak, as a function of .

Image of FIG. 4.

Click to view

FIG. 4.

((a)-(c)) False-color 2D maps of the z-component of the self-generated resistive B-field (in units of Tesla); ((d)-(f)) Corresponding false-color 2D profiles of the fast electron beam density ( ( )). Note that the y-axis scale is different in the two sets of plots to enable small-scale features in the resistive B-field to be viewed. The results are for a 200 m-thick Al target and 1 ps runtime, at given injection half-angles specified in ((a)-(c)). The fast electrons are injected at position (0,0,0) and the beam propagates in the direction of the x-axis. The grid size for these example simulations was equal to 1 m × 1 m × 1 m to enable small-scale features to be resolved.

Image of FIG. 5.

Click to view

FIG. 5.

(a) False-color 2D profiles of the fast electron density distribution ( ( )) at given depths for a 200 m-thick Al target for and 0.8 ps simulation time; (b) Same as (a), but with the B-field growth artificially suppressed in the simulation.

Image of FIG. 6.

Click to view

FIG. 6.

Fast electron beam diameter, , as a function of target thickness. Black squares correspond to the experimental data. Coloured symbols correspond to the lateral extent of the electron beam as determined from the simulations for given injection parameters. Unless otherwise stated, the B-field evolution is included in the simulation and . The beam size is extracted from the simulation results before refluxing at the rear surface boundary at time step equal to 0.4 ps for  = 100 m, 0.6 ps for  = 150 m, 0.9 ps for  = 200 m, and 1 ps for  = 250 m.

Image of FIG. 7.

Click to view

FIG. 7.

Maximum proton energy as a function of . As in Figure 1(b) , black squares are data from the present experiment (Al-Cu-Al) and white squares are the measurements from Yuan 14 Colored symbols are plasma expansion model calculations of using electron densities and ion acceleration times deduced from the hybrid simulation resultsof electron transport: (a) for fixed and given injection half-angles, ; (b) illustrating the effect of B-field suppression (for fixed and given ); and (c) for given and .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pop/20/4/10.1063/1.4799726
2013-04-05
2014-04-20

Abstract

Fast electron injection and transport in solid foils irradiated by sub-picosecond-duration laser pulses with peak intensity equal to is investigated experimentally and via 3D simulations. The simulations are performed using a hybrid-particle-in-cell (PIC) code for a range of fast electron beam injection conditions, with and without inclusion of self-generated resistive magnetic fields. The resulting fast electron beam transport properties are used in rear-surface plasma expansion calculations to compare with measurements of proton acceleration, as a function of target thickness. An injection half-angle of is inferred, which is significantly larger than that derived from previous experiments under similar conditions.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/pop/20/4/1.4799726.html;jsessionid=mvot9embm8do.x-aip-live-02?itemId=/content/aip/journal/pop/20/4/10.1063/1.4799726&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/pop
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Injection and transport properties of fast electrons in ultraintense laser-solid interactions
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/20/4/10.1063/1.4799726
10.1063/1.4799726
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM