1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Ping-pong modes and higher-periodicity multipactora)
a)Paper CI2 1, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. , 70 (2012).
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4802838
/content/aip/journal/pop/20/5/10.1063/1.4802838
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/20/5/10.1063/1.4802838
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic of particle orbits in a period-2 ping-pong multipactor. Reprinted with permission from R. A. Kishek, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 035003 (2012). Copyright 2012 American Physical Society.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Multipactor bounds as function of for N = 1 (solid) and N = 3 (dashed). Thin lines correspond to lower limits, while thicker lines correspond to upper limits from cutoff and stability. Both P1 (blue lines, gray-shaded areas) and PP2 (red lines, yellow-shaded areas) regions are shown. Reprinted with permission from R. A. Kishek, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 035003 (2012). Copyright 2012 American Physical Society.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Distribution of arrival phases after 5 rf cycles from two simulations at different peak gap voltages: (a) 100 V and (b) 158 V.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Number of live particles as a function of time over 5 rf periods for 100 V (blue-dotted) and 158 V (red-solid).

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

The upper cutoff bounds for P1 (blue-dashed) and PP2 (red solid), compared to WARP simulations (circles). The black dotted line is the lower limit due to W for unbaked copper. Reprinted with permission from R. A. Kishek, Phys. Rev. Lett. , 035003 (2012). Copyright 2012 American Physical Society.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

A portrayal of the raw simulation data used in calculating the circles in Fig. 5 . Each point corresponds to the effective SEE yield calculated from one simulation, where many simulations were run for each value of .

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

The N = 1 band from Fig. 2 displayed as a conventional susceptibility diagram of voltage versus fD, with the various limits indicated.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Construction of a multipactor map for a single-surface multipactor with /  = 0.2 and η = 0.3.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

The map in Fig. 8 after the modulo 2π operation. The bowtie region outlines the local stability criterion for a fixed point.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Repeated application of the map in Fig. 9 to advance a random starting phase. The orbit converges to a period-4 limit cycle.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

The map in Fig. 9 iterated (a) 4 times and (b) 1024 times.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pop/20/5/10.1063/1.4802838
2013-04-24
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Ping-pong modes and higher-periodicity multipactora)
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/20/5/10.1063/1.4802838
10.1063/1.4802838
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM