1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Fast ignition: Dependence of the ignition energy on source and target parameters for particle-in-cell-modelled energy and angular distributions of the fast electrons
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4804277
/content/aip/journal/pop/20/5/10.1063/1.4804277
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/20/5/10.1063/1.4804277
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Minimum electron energy required for ignition as a function of laser irradiance , for different fuel densities and assuming that the energy is deposited in the ideal beam diameter. Solid lines refer to the “PIC” distribution of Eq. (5) and scale as . Broken lines refer to the exponential distribution , with being the ponderomotive temperature, and scale as . The lines at constant e-beam ignition energy refer to the minimum ignition energy of Eq. (2) .

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Ignition energy as a function of target density and source-fuel distance, for an energy spectrum of the fast electrons given by Eq. (5) . The left column assumes a second harmonic laser of Nd-YAG ( ) and the right column considers its third harmonic ( ). The top row assumes a beam with , the bottom row assumes . The numbers in the white boxes of panel (a) are results from the numerical simulations described in Sec. III .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Laser intensity corresponding to the case (a) of Fig. 2 , as a function of fuel density and source-fuel distance. For distances larger than , the optimal focal spot was limited by the maximum value allowed of . Note that at small distances, it is convenient to focus the beam to small focal spots despite the increased hot electron temperature.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Normalized figures of merit of the distribution function of the hot electrons, for all the hot electrons with energy in the region . This distribution function belongs to the time  = 440 fs after the beginning of the simulation (that is, about 400 fs after the beginning of the interaction). Filled circles show the resolution used for each variable, resulting in a matrix with elements to be sampled in subsequent ignition calculations.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(a) Dependence of the angular distribution vs. angle θ, for three different ranges in . (b) Dependence of the angular distribution vs. angle , for three different ranges in . These figures show the correlation between angular and spatial variables.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Sampling of the multivariate distribution function with 500 particles/time step and a temporal resolution of 0.5 fs produces figures of merit of the distribution, which are close to the original particle-in-cell calculation. Red circles are obtained after collecting particles within of distance from the injection plane in Zuma, for a beam propagating through a DT plasma at 10 g/cc and temperature of 100 eV. The original PSC figures of merit are shown in blue (same as Fig. 4 ).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Energy contained in a box ahead of the injection plane in Zuma, normalized with respect to the energy contained in the collisionless PSC simulation. In the Zuma calculation, the electron beam propagates through a 10 g/cc DT plasma, with the inclusion of stopping and scattering.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Maps of the energy density (left) and longitudinal current (right) during propagation of the hot electron beam in a 30 g/cc DT plasma. For this Zuma simulation, the effects of scattering and stopping are included, electric and magnetic fields are switched off.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Map of the longitudinal flux (left) and corresponding axial lineout (right) radially averaged over , for the same parameters of Figure 8 .

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Dependence of the ignition energy as a function of source-fuel distance , for (left) and (right). Colors are associated with different peak densities; the thickness of the different bands represents the uncertainty on the ignition energy: simulations did (did not) ignite on the upper (lower) bound of each band.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Dependence of the ignition energy as a function of beam size multiplier , for (left) and (right). For and , no solution was found below 4 MJ.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pop/20/5/10.1063/1.4804277
2013-05-21
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Fast ignition: Dependence of the ignition energy on source and target parameters for particle-in-cell-modelled energy and angular distributions of the fast electrons
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/20/5/10.1063/1.4804277
10.1063/1.4804277
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM