No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
oa
Relationship of edge localized mode burst times with divertor flux loop signal phase in JET
Abstract
A phase relationship is identified between sequential edge localized modes (ELMs) occurrence times in a set of H-mode tokamak plasmas to the voltage measured in full flux azimuthal loops in the divertor region. We focus on plasmas in the Joint European Torus where a steady H-mode is sustained over several seconds, during which ELMs are observed in the Be II emission at the divertor. The ELMs analysed arise from intrinsic ELMing, in that there is no deliberate intent to control the ELMing process by external means. We use ELM timings derived from the Be II signal to perform direct time domain analysis of the full flux loop VLD2 and VLD3 signals, which provide a high cadence global measurement proportional to the voltage induced by changes in poloidal magnetic flux. Specifically, we examine how the time interval between pairs of successive ELMs is linked to the time-evolving phase of the full flux loop signals. Each ELM produces a clear early pulse in the full flux loop signals, whose peak time is used to condition our analysis. The arrival time of the following ELM, relative to this pulse, is found to fall into one of two categories: (i) prompt ELMs, which are directly paced by the initial response seen in the flux loop signals; and (ii) all other ELMs, which occur after the initial response of the full flux loop signals has decayed in amplitude. The times at which ELMs in category (ii) occur, relative to the first ELM of the pair, are clustered at times when the instantaneous phase of the full flux loop signal is close to its value at the time of the first ELM.
© 2014 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Received 17 April 2014
Accepted 20 May 2014
Published online 03 June 2014
Acknowledgments:
We acknowledge the EPSRC and CCFE for financial support. This work, supported by the European Communities under the Contract of Association between EURATOM and CCFE, was carried out within the framework of the European Fusion Development Agreement. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission. This work was also funded in part by the RCUK Energy Programme under Grant No. EP/I501045. This work was done under the JET-EFDA work programme. N.W.W. acknowledges the stimulating environment of the Natural Complexity Project at BAS, and J. Davidsen for discussions.
Article outline:
I. INTRODUCTION
II. TIME SIGNATURES OF PAIRS OF SUCCESSIVE ELMs
III. FULL FLUX LOOP INSTANTANEOUS PHASE
IV. CONCLUSIONS
/content/aip/journal/pop/21/6/10.1063/1.4881474
2.
2. V. Erckmann, F. Wagner, J. Baldzuhn, R. Brakel, R. Burhenn, U. Gasparino, P. Grigull, H. J. Hartfuss, J. V. Hofmann, R. Jaenicke et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2086 (1993).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2086
4.
4. A. Loarte, G. Saibene, R. Sartori, D. Campbell, M. Becoulet, L. Horton, T. Eich, A. Herrmann, G. Matthews, N. Asakura, A. Chankin, A. Leonard, G. Porter, G. Federici, G. Janeschitz, M. Shimada, and M. Sugiharaet, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 45, 1549 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/45/9/302
5.
5. K. Kamiya, N. Asakura, J. Boedo, T. Eich, G. Federici, M. Fenstermacher, K. Finken, A. Herrmann, J. Terry, A. Kirk, B. Koch, A. Loarte, R. Maingi, R. Maqueda, E. Nardon, N. Oyama, and R. Sartori, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 49, S43 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/49/7/S03
6.
6. R. J. Hawryluk, D. J. Campbell, G. Janeschitz, P. R. Thomas, R. Albanese, R. Ambrosino, C. Bachmann, L. Baylor, M. Becoulet, I. Benfatto, J. Bialek et al., Nucl. Fusion 49, 065012 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/49/6/065012
7.
7. G. S. Yun, W. Lee, M. J. Choi, J. Lee, H. K. Park, B. Tobias, C. W. Domier, N. C. Luhmann, Jr., A. J. H. Donn, J. H. Lee, and KSTAR Team, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 045004 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.045004
10.
10. F. A. Calderon, R. O. Dendy, S. C. Chapman, A. J. Webster, B. Alper, R. M. Nicol, and JET EDFA Contributors, Phys. Plasmas 20, 042306 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4802793
13.
13. A. Webster, R. O. Dendy, F. Calderon, S. C. Chapman, E. Delabie, D. Dodt, R. Felton, T. Todd, V. Riccardo, B. Alper, S. Brezinsek et al., “ Time-resonant tokamak plasma edge instabilities,” Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion (in press).
14.
14. R. N. Bracewell, The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, 2nd ed. (McGraw Hill, 1986).
16.
16. P. J. Schreier and L. L. Scharf, Statistical Signal Processing of Complex-Valued Data (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
17.
17. A. Pikovsky, M. G. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/21/6/10.1063/1.4881474
Article metrics loading...
/content/aip/journal/pop/21/6/10.1063/1.4881474
2014-06-03
2016-11-22
Abstract
A phase relationship is identified between sequential edge localized modes (ELMs) occurrence times in a set of H-mode tokamak plasmas to the voltage measured in full flux azimuthal loops in the divertor region. We focus on plasmas in the Joint European Torus where a steady H-mode is sustained over several seconds, during which ELMs are observed in the Be II emission at the divertor. The ELMs analysed arise from intrinsic ELMing, in that there is no deliberate intent to control the ELMing process by external means. We use ELM timings derived from the Be II signal to perform direct time domain analysis of the full flux loop VLD2 and VLD3 signals, which provide a high cadence global measurement proportional to the voltage induced by changes in poloidal magnetic flux. Specifically, we examine how the time interval between pairs of successive ELMs is linked to the time-evolving phase of the full flux loop signals. Each ELM produces a clear early pulse in the full flux loop signals, whose peak time is used to condition our analysis. The arrival time of the following ELM, relative to this pulse, is found to fall into one of two categories: (i) prompt ELMs, which are directly paced by the initial response seen in the flux loop signals; and (ii) all other ELMs, which occur after the initial response of the full flux loop signals has decayed in amplitude. The times at which ELMs in category (ii) occur, relative to the first ELM of the pair, are clustered at times when the instantaneous phase of the full flux loop signal is close to its value at the time of the first ELM.
Full text loading...
/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/pop/21/6/1.4881474.html;jsessionid=8gNPYLedAwNs_KY-sWtXA1cO.x-aip-live-06?itemId=/content/aip/journal/pop/21/6/10.1063/1.4881474&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/pop
Most read this month
Article
content/aip/journal/pop
Journal
5
3
true
true
Commenting has been disabled for this content