Skip to main content
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
/content/aip/journal/pop/21/6/10.1063/1.4884358
1.
1. M. Kristiansen and M. O. Hagler, in Proceedings of the First Topical Conference on RF Plasma Heating, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA, July 6–8, 1972, Vol. SR-2.
2.
2. K. Ikeda et al., “ Progress in the ITER physics basis,” Nucl. Fusion 47(6 ), S1 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/6/E01
3.
3. A. A. Tuccillo, E. Barbato, Y. S. Bae, A. Becoulet, S. Bernabei, P. Bibet, G. Calabrò, A. Cardinali, C. Castaldo, R. Cesario, M. H. Cho, S. Cirant, F. Crisanti, A. Ekedahl, L.-G. Eriksson, D. Farina, G. Giruzzi, M. Goniche, G. Granucci, S. Ide, F. Imbeaux, S. Karttunen, X. Litaudon, J. Mailloux, D. Mazon, F. Mirizzi, D. Moreau, S. Nowak, W. Namkung, L. Panaccione, V. Pericoli-Ridolfini, Y. Peysson, V. Petrzilka, S. Podda, K. Rantamaki, F. Santini, A. Saveliev, M. Schneider, C. Sozzi, and T. Suzuki, “ Progress in LHCD: A tool for advanced regimes on ITER,” Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 47(12B ), B363B377 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/47/12B/S26
4.
4. N. J. Fisch, “ Theory of current drive in plasmas,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 175 (1987).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.59.175
5.
5. R. Cesario, L. Amicucci, A. Cardinali, C. Castaldo, M. Marinucci, L. Panaccione, F. Santini, O. Tudisco, M. L. Apicella, G. Calabrò, C. Cianfarani, D. Frigione, A. Galli, G. Mazzitelli, C. Mazzotta, V. Pericoli, G. Schettini, A. A. Tuccillo, and the FTU Team, “ Current drive at plasma densities required for thermonuclear reactors,” Nature Commun. 1, 55 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1052
6.
6. M. Goniche, L. Amicucci, Y. Baranov, V. Basiuk, G. Calabro, A. Cardinali, C. Castaldo, R. Cesario, J. Decker, D. Dodt, A. Ekedahl, L. Figini, J. Garcia, G. Giruzzi, J. Hillairet, G. T. Hoang, A. Hubbard, E. Joffrin, K. Kirov, X. Litaudon, J. Mailloux, T. Oosako, R. Parker, V. Pericoli-Ridolfini, Y. Peysson, P. Platania, F. Rimini, P. K. Sharma, C. Sozzi, and G. Wallace, “ Lower hybrid current drive for the steady-state scenario,” Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 52(12 ), 124031 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/52/12/124031
7.
7. G. M. Wallace, R. R. Parker, P. T. Bonoli, A. E. Hubbard, J. W. Hughes, B. L. LaBombard, O. Meneghini, A. E. Schmidt, S. Shiraiwa, D. G. Whyte, J. C. Wright, S. J. Wukitch, R. W. Harvey, A. P. Smirnov, and J. R. Wilson, “ Absorption of lower hybrid waves in the scrape off layer of a diverted tokamak,” Phys. Plasmas 17(8 ), 082508 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3465662
8.
8. M. Porkolab, “ Theory of parametric instability near the lower hybrid frequency,” Phys. Fluids 17(7 ), 14321442 (1974).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1694910
9.
9. Y. Takase, M. Porkolab, J. J. Schuss, R. L. Watterson, C. L. Fiore, R. E. Slusher, and C. M. Surko, “ Observation of parametric instabilities in the lower-hybrid range of frequencies in the high-density tokamak,” Phys. Fluids 28(3 ), 983994 (1985).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.865070
10.
10. R. Koch, “ The coupling of electromagnetic power to plasmas,” Fusion Sci. Technol. 45(2 ), 193202 (2004).
11.
11. J. R. Wilson and P. T. Bonoli, “ Progress on ion cyclotron range of frequencies (ICRF) heating physics and technology in support of the international tokamak experimental reactor (ITER),” Phys. Plasmas (to be published).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/21/6/10.1063/1.4884358
Loading
/content/aip/journal/pop/21/6/10.1063/1.4884358
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/pop/21/6/10.1063/1.4884358
2014-06-19
2016-09-27

Abstract

It has long been recognized that auxiliary plasma heating will be required to achieve the high temperature, high density conditions within a magnetically confined plasma in which a fusion “burn” may be sustained by copious fusion reactions. Consequently, the application of radio and microwave frequency electromagnetic waves to magnetically confined plasma, commonly referred to as RF, has been a major part of the program almost since its inception in the 1950s. These RF waves provide heating, current drive, plasma profile control, and Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) stabilization. Fusion experiments employ electromagnetic radiation in a wide range of frequencies, from tens of MHz to hundreds of GHz. The fusion devices containing the plasma are typically tori, axisymmetric or non, in which the equilibrium magnetic fields are composed of a strong toroidal magnetic field generated by external coils, and a poloidal field created, at least in the symmetric configurations, by currents flowing in the plasma. The waves are excited in the peripheral regions of the plasma, by specially designed launching structures, and subsequently propagate into the core regions, where resonant wave-plasma interactions produce localized heating or other modification of the local equilibrium profiles. Experimental studies coupled with the development of theoretical models and advanced simulation codes over the past 40+ years have led to an unprecedented understanding of the physics of RF heating and current drive in the of magnetic fusion devices. Nevertheless, there are serious gaps in our knowledge base that continue to have a negative impact on the success of ongoing experiments and that must be resolved as the program progresses to the next generation devices and ultimately to “demo” and “fusion power plant.” A serious gap, at least in the ion cyclotron (IC) range of frequencies and partially in the lower hybrid frequency ranges, is the difficulty in coupling large amount of power to the plasma while minimizing the interaction between the plasma and launching structures. These potentially harmful interactions between the plasma and the vessel and launching structures are challenging: (i) significant and variable loss of power in the edge regions of confined plasmas and surrounding vessel structures adversely affect the core plasma performance and lifetime of a device; (ii) the launcher design is partly “trial and error,” with the consequence that launchers may have to be reconfigured after initial tests in a given device, at an additional cost. Over the broader frequency range, another serious gap is a quantitative lack of understanding of the combined effects of nonlinear wave-plasma processes, energetic particle interactions and non-axisymmetric equilibrium effects on determining the overall efficiency of plasma equilibrium and stability profile control techniques using RF waves. This is complicated by a corresponding lack of predictive understanding of the time evolution of transport and stability processes in fusion plasmas.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/pop/21/6/1.4884358.html;jsessionid=6-Ih4_PvQP-EFqZZGH97V9Wc.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/aip/journal/pop/21/6/10.1063/1.4884358&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/pop
true
true

Access Key

  • FFree Content
  • OAOpen Access Content
  • SSubscribed Content
  • TFree Trial Content
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
/content/realmedia?fmt=ahah&adPositionList=
&advertTargetUrl=//oascentral.aip.org/RealMedia/ads/&sitePageValue=pop.aip.org/21/6/10.1063/1.4884358&pageURL=http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/pop/21/6/10.1063/1.4884358'
Right1,Right2,Right3,