No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
oa
The global build-up to intrinsic edge localized mode bursts seen in divertor full flux loops in JET
Abstract
A global signature of the build-up to an intrinsic edge localized mode
(ELM) is found in the temporal analytic phase of signals measured in full flux azimuthal loops in the divertor region of JET. Toroidally integrating, full flux loop signals provide a global measurement proportional to the voltage induced by changes in poloidal magnetic flux; they are electromagnetically induced by the dynamics of spatially integrated current density. We perform direct time-domain analysis of the high time-resolution full flux loop signals VLD2 and VLD3. We analyze plasmas where a steady H-mode is sustained over several seconds during which all the observed ELMs are intrinsic; there is no deliberate intent to pace the ELMing process by external means. ELM occurrence times are determined from the Be II emission at the divertor. We previously [Chapman et al., Phys. Plasmas 21, 062302 (2014); Chapman et al., in 41st EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, Europhysics Conference Abstracts (European Physical Society, 2014), Vol. 38F, ISBN 2-914771-90-8] found that the occurrence times of intrinsic ELMs correlate with specific temporal analytic phases of the VLD2 and VLD3 signals. Here, we investigate how the VLD2 and VLD3 temporal analytic phases vary with time in advance of the ELM occurrence time. We identify a build-up to the ELM in which the VLD2 and VLD3 signals progressively align to the temporal analytic phase at which ELMs preferentially occur, on a
timescale. At the same time, the VLD2 and VLD3 signals become temporally phase synchronized with each other, consistent with the emergence of coherent global dynamics in the integrated current density. In a plasma that remains close to a global magnetic equilibrium, this can reflect bulk displacement or motion of the plasma. This build-up signature to an intrinsic ELM can be extracted from a time interval of data that does not extend beyond the ELM occurrence time, so that these full flux loop signals could assist in ELM prediction or mitigation.
© 2015 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Received 05 March 2015
Accepted 26 June 2015
Published online 10 July 2015
Acknowledgments:
We acknowledge the EPSRC for financial support. This work has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium and has received funding from the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 633053, and from the RCUK Energy Programme [Grant No. EP/I501045]. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission. We acknowledge J. Davidsen and participants in the 2014 MPIPKS workshop on Causality, Information Transfer and Dynamical Networks for discussions, and A. J. Webster for provision of data.
Article outline:
I. INTRODUCTION
II. ELM AND FULL FLUX LOOP TIME SIGNATURES
III. DETERMINATION OF FULL FLUX LOOP INSTANTANEOUS TEMPORAL ANALYTIC PHASE
IV. FULL FLUX LOOP INSTANTANEOUS TEMPORAL ANALYTIC PHASE AND BUILD-UP TO AN ELM
V. CIRCULAR STATISTICS AND THE RAYLEIGH TEST
VI. DISCUSSION
VII. CONCLUSIONS
/content/aip/journal/pop/22/7/10.1063/1.4926592
2.
2. V. Erckmann, F. Wagner, J. Baldzuhn, R. Brakel, R. Burhenn, U. Gasparino, P. Grigull, H. J. Hartfuss, J. V. Hofmann, R. Jaenicke et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2086 (1993).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2086
4.
4. A. Loarte, G. Saibene, R. Sartori, D. Campbell, M. Becoulet, L. Horton, T. Eich, A. Herrmann, G. Matthews, N. Asakura, A. Chankin, A. Leonard, G. Porter, G. Federici, G. Janeschitz, M. Shimada, and M. Sugiharaet, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 45, 1549 (2003).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/45/9/302
5.
5. K. Kamiya, N. Asakura, J. Boedo, T. Eich, G. Federici, M. Fenstermacher, K. Finken, A. Herrmann, J. Terry, A. Kirk, B. Koch, A. Loarte, R. Maingi, R. Maqueda, E. Nardon, N. Oyama, and R. Sartori, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 49, S43 (2007).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/49/7/S03
6.
6. R. J. Hawryluk, D. J. Campbell, G. Janeschitz, P. R. Thomas, R. Albanese, R. Ambrosino, C. Bachmann, L. Baylor, M. Becoulet, I. Benfatto, J. Bialek et al., Nucl. Fusion 49, 065012 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/49/6/065012
8.
8. P. B. Snyder, H. R. Wilson, J. R. Ferron, L. L. Lao, A. W. Leonard, T. H. Osborne, A. D. Turnbull, D. Mossessian, M. Murakami, and X. Q. Xu, Phys. Plasmas 9, 2037 (2002).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1449463
9.
9. G. S. Yun, W. Lee, M. J. Choi, J. Lee, H. K. Park, B. Tobias, C. W. Domier, N. C. Luhmann, Jr., A. J. H. Donn, J. H. Lee, and (KSTAR Team), Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 045004 (2011).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.045004
12.
12. F. A. Calderon, R. O. Dendy, S. C. Chapman, A. J. Webster, B. Alper, R. M. Nicol, and JET EDFA Contributors, Phys. Plasmas 20, 042306 (2013).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4802793
14.
14. A. J. Webster, R. O. Dendy, F. Calderon, S. C. Chapman, E. Delabie, D. Dodt, R. Felton, T. Todd, V. Riccardo, B. Alper, S. Brezinsek et al., Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 56, 075017 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/56/7/075017
15.
15. A. Murari, F. Pisano, J. Vega, B. Cannas, A. Fanni, S. Gonzalez, M. Gelfusa, M. Grosso, and JET EFDA Contributors, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 56, 114007 (2014).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/56/11/114007
17.
17. S. C. Chapman, R. O. Dendy, A. J. Webster, N. W. Watkins, T. N. Todd, J. Morris, and JET EFDA Contributors, in 41st EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, Europhysics Conference Abstracts ( European Physical Society, 2014), Vol. 38F, ISBN 2-914771-90-8.
19.
19. R. N. Bracewell, The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, 2nd ed. ( McGraw Hill, 1986).
21.
21. A. Pikovsky, M. G. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences ( Cambridge University Press, 2003).
23.
23. N. I. Fisher, Statistical Analysis of Circular Data, revised edition ( Cambridge University Press, 1995).
24.
24. P. Berens, J. Stat. Software 31, 10 (2009).
25.
25. E. de la Luna et al., in Proceedings of the 36th EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, Sofia, Bulgaria, 29th June–3rd July 2009.
26.
26. F. Sartori et al., in 35th EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, ECA, Hersonissos, 9–13 June 2008 (2008), Vol. 32D, p. 5.045.
28.
28. S. P. Gerhardt, J.-W. Ahn, J. M. Canik, R. Maingi, R. Bell, D. Gates, R. Goldston, R. Hawryluk, B. P. Le Blanc, J. Menard, A. C. Sontag, S. Sabbagh, and K. Tritz, Nucl. Fusion 50, 064015 (2010).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/50/6/064015
29.
29. Neto et al., in 50th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference (CDC-ECC), Orlando, FL, USA, 12–15 December 2011.
30.
30. S. H. Kim, M. M. Cavinato, V. Dokuka, A. A. Ivanov, R. R. Khayrutdinov, P. T. Lang, J. B. Lister, V. E. Lukash, Y. R. Martin, S. Yu Medvedev, and L. Villard, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 51, 055021 (2009).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/51/5/055021
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/pop/22/7/10.1063/1.4926592
Article metrics loading...
/content/aip/journal/pop/22/7/10.1063/1.4926592
2015-07-10
2016-11-22
Abstract
A global signature of the build-up to an intrinsic edge localized mode
(ELM) is found in the temporal analytic phase of signals measured in full flux azimuthal loops in the divertor region of JET. Toroidally integrating, full flux loop signals provide a global measurement proportional to the voltage induced by changes in poloidal magnetic flux; they are electromagnetically induced by the dynamics of spatially integrated current density. We perform direct time-domain analysis of the high time-resolution full flux loop signals VLD2 and VLD3. We analyze plasmas where a steady H-mode is sustained over several seconds during which all the observed ELMs are intrinsic; there is no deliberate intent to pace the ELMing process by external means. ELM occurrence times are determined from the Be II emission at the divertor. We previously [Chapman et al., Phys. Plasmas 21, 062302 (2014); Chapman et al., in 41st EPS Conference on Plasma Physics, Europhysics Conference Abstracts (European Physical Society, 2014), Vol. 38F, ISBN 2-914771-90-8] found that the occurrence times of intrinsic ELMs correlate with specific temporal analytic phases of the VLD2 and VLD3 signals. Here, we investigate how the VLD2 and VLD3 temporal analytic phases vary with time in advance of the ELM occurrence time. We identify a build-up to the ELM in which the VLD2 and VLD3 signals progressively align to the temporal analytic phase at which ELMs preferentially occur, on a
timescale. At the same time, the VLD2 and VLD3 signals become temporally phase synchronized with each other, consistent with the emergence of coherent global dynamics in the integrated current density. In a plasma that remains close to a global magnetic equilibrium, this can reflect bulk displacement or motion of the plasma. This build-up signature to an intrinsic ELM can be extracted from a time interval of data that does not extend beyond the ELM occurrence time, so that these full flux loop signals could assist in ELM prediction or mitigation.
Full text loading...
/deliver/fulltext/aip/journal/pop/22/7/1.4926592.html?itemId=/content/aip/journal/pop/22/7/10.1063/1.4926592&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/aip/journal/pop
Most read this month
Article
content/aip/journal/pop
Journal
5
3
true
true
Commenting has been disabled for this content