A mean velocity profile generated from NMR imaging for carboxymethyl cellulose solution (see Ref. 26).
Results deduced from the velocity profile shown in Fig. 1, along with measurements from the Haake Rotovisco RV20 viscometer using the same fluid (see Ref. 26).
NMR velocity profiles for aqueous xantham gum solutions. The points represent the average of 50 measurements in the radial vicinity, and the error bars represent the standard deviation of these 50 points (see Ref. 27). (a) 1% xantham gum with , (b) 0.2% xantham gum with , and (c) 1% guar gum with .
Plot of vs (see Ref. 27). (a) 1% aqueous xantham gum. The line corresponds to Eq. (7). (b) 0.2% aqueous xantham gum. The line corresponds to . (c) 1.0% aqueous guar gum. The dashed line corresponds to and the dotted line corresponds to .
A schematic diagram illustrating the measurement principle of the UPD technique (see Ref. 31).
A measured velocity profile of glycerine water solution using UPD mapping (see Ref. 31).
The viscosity data measured using the GUPD technique and a commercial rheometer, respectively (see Ref. 31).
A possible velocity profile from a complex liquid in a tubular flow (see Ref. 30).
The velocity profiles of a mayonnaise sample determined by a UPD viscometer sensor at different flow rates (a, b, and c) (see Ref. 30).
Concentration dependence of the viscosity of diluted honey samples measured using a Couette viscometer and an ultrasonic spectrometry at (see Ref. 36).
Schematic model for the breakage of gel structure in aqueous hyaluronan solution (see Ref. 38). (a) Solution at rest, shear rate of for intermolecular hydrogen bonds between chains. (b) Shear rate of for disruption of hydrogen bonds between larger aggregates. (c) Shear rate of for breakage of many intermolecular hydrogen bonds.
A schematic diagram of the mass-detecting capillary viscometer (see Ref. 39).
The mass variation of the collected fluid as a function of time (see Ref. 40).
The flow curves of soymilk at room temperature obtained with a MDCV and rotating viscometer (see Ref. 40).
A schematic diagram of the scanning dual-capillary-tube viscometer (see Ref. 42).
The viscosity measurement for mineral oil at with a scanning dual-capillary-tube viscometer (SDCV) and a rotating viscometer (RV) (see Ref. 42).
The deep-channel surface viscometer (see Ref. 61).
Basic model of the deep-channel surface viscometer (see Ref. 61).
Deep-channel surface viscometer data for 2% aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)-air interface (see Ref. 61).
Deep-channel surface viscometer data for the 0.02% carbopol-air interface (see Ref. 61).
Deep-channel surface viscometer data for the 2% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)-benzene interface (see Ref. 61).
Schematic of transparent annular channel geometry (see Ref. 63).
Azimuthal velocity profiles at the interface driven with for as indicated; the broken lines are measurements using digital particle imaging velocimetry (DPIV) and the solid lines are computed (see Ref. 63).
The biconical bob interfacial viscometer (see Ref. 48).
Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for a biconical bob interfacial viscometer (see Ref. 48).
Interfacial viscoelastic parameters for the interface of 0.05% PVA in water, in contact with oil phase (see Ref. 57).
Surface loss modulus as a function of frequency with surfactant concentration as a parameter (gelatin-surfactant solutions at ) (see Ref. 63).
Steady-state interfacial shear viscosity of sorbitan tristearate films (air/water interface) at different surfactant concentrations (see Ref. 54).
General layout of the modified rotational rheometer (MRR): (1) top fixture coupled to torque transducer, (2) bottom fixture driving plate, (3) rollers, (4) clamp, (5) high-temperature bath, (6) spring, (7) main arm, and (8) sample (see Ref. 76).
Transient uniaxial extensional viscosity results for a low-density polyethylene (IUPAC-X) at shown on each line (see Ref. 76). Open symbols, MRR; solid lines, RME; and dashed lines, fiber windup.
Schematic of Rheometrics RFX extensional rheometer (see Ref. 81).
The apparent extensional viscosity for a Newtonian fluid at three different gaps to diameter ratios. At each ratio, the data are comprised of measurements made using three different jet sizes (see Ref. 81).
The effect on the extensional flow curves of 5.8% solutions of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) on the addition of sodium dodeclsulphate (SDS) and glycerol (see Ref. 81).
(a) Section of the transducer head (see Ref. 84). (b) Schematic of sample deformation: (above) the resulting stress distribution in compression and (below) the resulting stress distribution in shear. The arrows indicate the relative motion of the plates (see Ref. 84).
Compressive stress vs strain for chloroprene foam with (a) and (b) (see Ref. 84).
Comparison between a triaxial rheometer (squares) and a conventional parallel disk rheometer (circles). The resulting initial shear modulus, , is indicated (see Ref. 84).
(a) Schematic of the high-temperature and high-pressure (HTHP) viscometer (see Ref. 109). (b) Schematic of the cup-spindle assembly (see Ref. 109).
Viscosity of a petroleum oil sample with Physica’s MCR under different pressure levels (see Ref. 110).
Diagram of a magnetically levitated sphere rheometer (see Ref. 112).
Summary of the different modifications approaches to conventional techniques.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...