1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Dynamic studies of small animals with a four-color diffuse optical tomography imager
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2038467
/content/aip/journal/rsi/76/9/10.1063/1.2038467
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/76/9/10.1063/1.2038467

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Optical switch and four-wavelength mixing optic developed for the small-animal imager: (left) schematic drawing of the assembly; (right) photograph of device.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Photographs of small-animal imaging platform. (a) Platform with fiber optics (1), strain relief (2), and animal cradle (3); inset shows ear bars with probes (4), curved mouth fiber (5), and dorsal rectilinear optode array (6). (b) Animal fixation and probe placement in the experiment.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(a) Schematic of the adjustable fiber array holder and its position on the animal’s head and (b) cross-sectional schematic of the bent mouth probe.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) Long-term stability of the optical signal. Shown for each wavelength are the mean, the minimum, and the maximum CV of the signal variations for all channels during of continuous instrument operation. Error bars indicate standard deviation. (b) Long-term drift of the noise in the optical signal. Shown for each wavelength are the mean, the minimum, the maximum, and the standard deviation (error bars) of temporal fluctuations in signal CV for all channels during of instrument operation.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Four-wavelength calibration results for four measurements performed over : (a) mean source coupling coefficients and (b) mean detector sensitivity coefficients . Error bars indicate extreme values. Viewing from left to right within each group of bars, the data are arranged in the order 726, 760, 810, and .

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Geometry used for modeling light transport in the rat head. Positions of the fiber probes are indicated: (a) horizontal (bottom) view and (b) coronal (front) view.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

(Color) Results of numerical simulation study: (left) three orthogonal views of geometrical rat head model, with region containing elevated absorption shown in green and (right) corresponding views of recovered image.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Time series of the spatially integrated Hb response to stimulation. Vertical lines indicate start and cessation, for three consecutive epochs of left front paw stimulation.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Spatially integrated hemodynamic response of the rat brain to stimulation. Continuous curves represent the measured response averaged over all trials (error bars indicate standard deviation at each time point). Dashed curves are the analytically derived best-fitting functions that were used as models in the GLM calculations.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

(Color) Volume rendering of differential and response, color coded according to the algebraic signs of each pixels’s GLM coefficients.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

(Color) Overlay of GLM results onto anatomical cross sections of the rat head for (a) and (b); -dorsal, -ventral, -caudal, -rostral, l-hypothalamus, 2–thalamus, 3–hippocampus, 4–neocortex, 5–muscles (cryosectional images, © UCLA Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, Ref. 31).

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

(Color) Volume PVA data, obtained from GLM computations.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

Cumulative distribution functions of CV values for the image GLM coefficients.

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

(Color) Volume rendered display of areas having significantly different hemodynamic response to left and right stimulation. Different classes of reaction are color coded.

Image of FIG. 15.
FIG. 15.

(Color) Volume rendering of those head areas that show significant differences between PVA values for stimulation of the left and right forepaws.

Image of FIG. 16.
FIG. 16.

Volume rendering of those brain regions which react in a significantly different manner to stimulation of left and right forepaws, for both and .

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Response strength variation.

Generic image for table
Table II.

GLM coefficient reproducibility.

Generic image for table
Table III.

PVA reproducibility.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/rsi/76/9/10.1063/1.2038467
2005-09-21
2014-04-25
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Dynamic studies of small animals with a four-color diffuse optical tomography imager
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/76/9/10.1063/1.2038467
10.1063/1.2038467
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM