1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Invited Article: An improved double-toroidal spectrometer for gas phase studies
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2813014
/content/aip/journal/rsi/78/11/10.1063/1.2813014
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/78/11/10.1063/1.2813014
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

The geometry of a toroidal surface is characterized by the “cylindrical radius” and “spherical radius” . The limiting case of the “cylindrical-to-spherical-radius ratio” corresponds to the family of spherical surfaces, while describes cylindrical surfaces. represents the axis of cylindrical symmetry. is the azimuthal angular displacement measured clockwise around the axis and with respect to the positive axis. Polar angles in the radial planes are measured clockwise about the spherical-radius origin located on the positive axis and with respect to the positive axis.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

A toroidal-sector analyzer comprises a pair of nested toroidal-sector electrodes spanning truncated azimuthal and polar ranges and , respectively, where and . The two electrodes are characterized by an identical cylindrical radius , but different spherical radii and (held at potentials and , respectively). To first order and neglect fringing fields, electrons emanating with parallel trajectories from an extended source in the axial plane centered on the cylindrical-symmetry axis come to focus at a unique polar deflection angle ( in this example).

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

A radial-plane cross section through two pairs of concentric toroidal electrodes. For each pair, the inner and outer electrodes are maintained at different potentials. The figure shows the dependence of the shape of the interelectrode equipotential surfaces on the value of the “cylindrical-to-spherical-radius ratio” . In case (i) (small value) significant deviations from circular symmetry are observed in the range . In case (ii) (large value) the equipotentials are well approximated by circles.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Radial-plane cross section through concentric toroidal-sector electrodes showing simulated electron trajectories for the five entrance energies (95, 97.5, 100, 102.5, and ) and for the entrance angles of 0°, , and . The potentials and applied to the inner- and outer-toroidal-sector electrodes are and , respectively. Electrons of the same entrance energy, but different entrance angles, come to focus (to first order) after a deflection angle . The effects of fringing fields have been neglected in this simulation.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Graph showing the functional dependencies of the deflection angle for “point-to-point” focusing in the radial plane (solid line) and the deflection angle for “parallel-to-point” focusing angle in the axial plane (dashed line) as functions of the parameter value. Simultaneous focusing in both planes occurs at the deflection angle for . Also shown is the function (dash-dot curve), pertinent to the discussion of the double-toroidal analyzer, which crosses the function at the coordinates (, ).

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Simulated electron trajectories through the present double-toroidal analyzer. Electrons emitted in the scattering plane are deflected through 270° and focused on to a position-sensitive delay-line detector from which their emission energies , azimuthal emission angles , and arrival-time coordinates are deduced. Trajectories corresponding to five different scattered electron energies (95, 97.5, 100, 102.5, and ) and five different polar entrance angles are shown for the pass energy . The inner- and outer-toroidal-sector electrodes for the 180° pair are held at the respective potentials and and for the 90° pair at the respective potentials and . For this simulation, the deceleration ratio was used (see text for details).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Schematic representation of alternative analyzer designs for different values of the angular variable (see text for details). Each design comprises two toroidal-sector electrode pairs of respective cylindrical radii and and respective polar sector angles and . Continuity between inner- and outer-electrode surfaces is maintained by the collinearity of the spherical radius origins ( and ) and , the point where the central electron path intersects the interface between the two electrode pairs. Only for is .

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Radial-plane view of the interface between the two toroidal-sector electrode pairs comprising the present double-toroidal-sector analyzer. Equipotential lines are shown for (a) the case of equal pass energies and (b) the case where the pass energy of the second toroidal-sector electrode pair is twice that of the first. For case (b), the applied potentials correspond to the simulation of Fig. 6. See text for details.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

The seven-element angle-resolving electrostatic lens system used to angularly select and focus electrons emitted from the interaction region at angles . It consists of a grounded first lens , two defining slits and , and five focusing lenses of independently adjustable potentials. The final lens is fixed to a potential value determined by the analyzer pass energy . Each lens comprises an identical pair of annular electrodes. Indicated dimensions are in millimeters. See text for details.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Divergence of initially parallel electron trajectories as they pass between two juxtaposed pairs of annular-lens electrodes operated at different potentials (axial-plane view). The dimensions, electron energies, and potentials were chosen for illustrative purposes only. Parallel off-axial rays are deflected in the axial plane as they traverse the lens-pair interface. The degree of axial-plane deflection increases monotonically with increasing displacement of the trajectory from that of an electron emanating from the axis of cylindrical symmetry into the same azimuthal scattering angle . Note that deviations shown are due to curvature of lens surfaces, not due to the apparent “discrete” nature of the simulation grid.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Double-toroidal-sector electron analyzer (lens system removed). For clarity, field correcting side plates which assist in correcting for fringe fields at the edges of both the lens system and toroidal-sector analyzer have also been removed. Supporting bar, is for structural stability only, and is removed when side plates are in place. See text for details.

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

Schematic representation of the polarized-electron spectrometer comprising polarized-electron source, two double-toroidal-sector electron analyzers, and a Mott polarimeter (not shown). See text for details.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

Schematic representation of the electron detection and instrumental control electronics. It comprises microchannel-plate electron multipliers (MCP), two delay-line position-and-time-sensitive detectors, amplifiers, and discriminators, fast coincidence unit, CAMAC-based 16-channel time-to-digital converter, spin-tag electronics, liquid crystal retarders and their control electronics, and computer with data-acquisition card and running COBOLD analysis-and-display software. See text for details.

Image of FIG. 14.
FIG. 14.

Coincidence-timing spectrum measured for analyzer pass energies of and deceleration ratios . coincidence counts are displayed as a function of the time difference , where and represent the respective arrival times for the two electrons comprising each recorded electron pair. See text for details.

Image of FIG. 15.
FIG. 15.

Detector image resulting from the measurement of electrons scattered elastically from helium. The electron energy was stepped from at intervals of . Electrons of a given energy trace out an arc on the detector. The radius of the arc varies monotonically with electron energy while the angular position along each varies linearly with the azimuthal electron-emission angle . See text for details.

Image of FIG. 16.
FIG. 16.

Differential cross section for electrons elastically scattered from argon at an impact energy of . Open circles: present results. Solid circles: experimental results of Panajotovic et al. (Ref. 58). Solid line: relativistic polarized-orbital calculation by McEachran (Ref. 59) convoluted with a 2° FWHM Gaussian. The present results have been normalized to the data of Panajotovic et al. at a scattering angle of 50°.

Image of FIG. 17.
FIG. 17.

Measured angular distribution for elastic scattering from helium at . Solid circles: present results. Open circles connected by straight lines: experimental results of Register et al. (Ref. 60). Large scatter in present data points primarily attributable to spatial gain variations in microchannel-plate detection efficiency. See text for details.

Image of FIG. 18.
FIG. 18.

Elastic scattering measurement from background helium gas. Experimental conditions as for Fig. 17, except that the target gas is introduced from a position well removed from the axis.

Image of FIG. 19.
FIG. 19.

Schematic representation of scattering geometry and coordinate system defining the triple-differential ionization cross section. An incident electron of energy ionizes a target atom, resulting in the ejection of two electrons of respective energies and into the polar and azimuthal emission angles and , and and , respectively. For the present spectrometer design, only those electron pairs emitted into a common plane containing the incident electron trajectory (the so-called scattering plane) are measured.

Image of FIG. 20.
FIG. 20.

Relative cross section for the ionization of ground-state helium where the residual ion is excited to the manifold. The incident beam energy was , the fast and slow scattered electrons of 200 and respective mean energies. For these kinematics, ionization leading to this excited state is around 0.4% of the intensity of transitions leaving the residual ion in the ground state. Data-collection time was around . See text for details.

Image of FIG. 21.
FIG. 21.

Doubly symmetric measurement on helium where the residual ion is left in the ground electronic state. Incident beam energy , electron scattering angles . Solid circles: present data, open squares: Murray and Read (Ref. 63). Present data have been normalized to Murray and Read data for best visual fit. Error bars on Murray and Read data not shown as they are smaller than symbols. See text for details.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/rsi/78/11/10.1063/1.2813014
2007-11-27
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Invited Article: An improved double-toroidal spectrometer for gas phase (e,2e) studies
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/78/11/10.1063/1.2813014
10.1063/1.2813014
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM