1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
A clamp-type pressure cell for high energy x-ray diffraction
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.2889162
/content/aip/journal/rsi/79/3/10.1063/1.2889162
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/79/3/10.1063/1.2889162
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Top: pressure cell: (1) hardened MP35N pressure cell, (2) x-ray window, (3) thermometer position, (4) MP35N suspension ring, (5) hardened CuBe lock screw, (6) tungsten carbide thrust disk, (7) tungsten carbide piston, (8) Teflon sample holder. Bottom: schematic drawing of pressure cell with sample, pressure calibrant, and external piston. Dimensions in millimeter.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Left: compression of the pressure cell vs load during autofrettage process using a piston with diameter. A Teflon cylinder served as pressure transmitting medium. Right: vs load during the experiment on a single crystal contained in a Teflon cup filled with DAPHNE oil. The Teflon cup also contained a small crystal. Here, a piston with diameter was used.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Intensity vs scattering angle for the powder spectrum of MP35N. The arrows indicate the values of a selection of superlattice reflections of interest in .

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Intensity of the (0.5, 3, 0.5) superstructure reflection of vs temperature for different loads. The inset shows the extracted pressure values at low temperature.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Orthorhombic strain vs parameter . As described in detail in Ref. 31, , where , is the temperature of the high-temperature structural transition in , and accounts for the nonlinearity of at low . is the critical pressure in , and the critical Sr content in to suppress the orthorhombic phase. We have used the same parameter values (Ref. 32) as in Ref. 31, except for , which has a slightly smaller , and for , where we have adjusted the Sr content to , to compensate the effect of Nd doping on and . The data for in were taken from Ref. 33, in from Ref. 31, in this work, and in from Ref. 34.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Left: single crystals of (black) and (blue). is used as a pressure calibrant. The red object is a match head (for scale). The black dot below the scale indicates the typical size of a sample that fits into a DAC. Right: pressure dependence of in as determined from ac susceptibility in magnetic fields between 0.1 and (Ref. 39).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Orthorhombic strain at , 1.5, and for various temperatures, as determined from transverse scans through the Bragg peaks. The additional split of the reflections in the orthorhombic phase at and most likely indicates a weak monoclinic distortion, previously observed in (Ref. 46).

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Left: scans through the charge stripe order peak at of the crystal (mounted in the pressure cell) at different temperatures. These data are for ambient pressure. All scans, except the one at , are shifted for clarity. A corresponding scan through the nearby (2, 0, 6) Bragg reflection at indicates the instrumental resolution (solid red line). The background signal of the pressure cell is , the sample contributes another to the background. At , the ratio between peak intensity and combined background is about 1:5. Right: normalized integrated intensity of the (2.24, 0, 5.5) charge peak and the (1, 0, 0) LTT peak vs temperature.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/rsi/79/3/10.1063/1.2889162
2008-03-20
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: A clamp-type pressure cell for high energy x-ray diffraction
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/79/3/10.1063/1.2889162
10.1063/1.2889162
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM