1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
A laser-Compton scattering prototype experiment at 100 MeV linac of Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3282445
/content/aip/journal/rsi/81/1/10.1063/1.3282445
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/81/1/10.1063/1.3282445

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic of the Compton scattering process. All the parameters are given in the laboratory frame. Here, and are the kinetic energies of incident and scattered electron, and are the energies of incident laser photon and LCS x-ray, and and are the incident angle of laser photon and scattered angle of LCS x-ray with respect to the direction of incident electron beam, respectively.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

LCS experimental setup.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Amplitude of electron macropulse current monitored by WCM as a function of time.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Electron macropulse width (rms) monitored by WCM as a function of time. The average value of electron macropulse width (rms) is 0.95 ns.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Laser pulse amplitude monitored by as a function of time. The line is the mean value of laser pulse amplitudes. The unstability is estimated to be (The unstability is defined as the ratio of one sigma deviation of mean value to mean value.)

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Laser pulse width (FWHM) monitored by EPM1000 as a function of time. The line is the average value of laser pulse width (FWHM) measured to be 21.2 ns.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

X-ray spectrum of source. Three x-ray peaks of radioactive are 27.47, 31.0, and 35.46 keV, respectively.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Spot images of an electron beam (left) and a He–Ne laser beam (right) at the center of the LCS chamber (interaction point).

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Layout of synchronization between Nd:YAG laser pulse and electron macropulse. Both M1 and M2 are eight-channel programmable pulse generators. M1 runs with a repetition of 5 Hz and provides TTL trigger signals to the following devices: (1) Electron gun, (2) Nd:YAG laser, and (3) M2. M2 provides an pretrigger signal to Nd:YAG laser. Oscillograph (TDS 7104) and its LABVIEW program are used to monitor and record the relative time difference between laser pulse and electron macropulse.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Time difference between Nd:YAG laser pulse and electron macropulse measured by the oscillograph as a function of time. The error bar includes systematic error and statistical error.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

A cartoon picture of working modes of the LCS experiment.

Image of FIG. 12.
FIG. 12.

The measured LCS x-ray spectrum. The histogram labeled by laser on (solid line) is LCS x-ray signals including background radiation. The histogram labeled by laser off (dashed line) is mainly background radiation. The inserted histogram labeled by is the LCS x-ray spectrum after background subtraction.

Image of FIG. 13.
FIG. 13.

Schematic view of the collision between laser and electron beam. In the 42° interaction scheme, is dependent on the electron beam waist size and laser incident angle with regard to electron beam.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

Basic parameters of the Si(Li) detector.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/rsi/81/1/10.1063/1.3282445
2010-01-19
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: A laser-Compton scattering prototype experiment at 100 MeV linac of Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/81/1/10.1063/1.3282445
10.1063/1.3282445
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM