1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Offset phase locking of noisy diode lasers aided by frequency division
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.3627535
/content/aip/journal/rsi/82/8/10.1063/1.3627535
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/82/8/10.1063/1.3627535
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic diagrams of heterodyne phase-locking configurations. (a) A typical diode laser phase synchronization system. (b) A simplified phase synchronization configuration that takes advantage of an in-loop frequency divider and eliminates the microwave synthesizer.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Spectra of optical beat notes at 6.8 GHz (1) and at 212 MHz (2). The PLL is off.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Spectra of optical beat notes of two phase-locked lasers. PLL with microwave synthesizer (1); PLL with frequency divider (2) (n = 8).

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Spectra of optical beat notes with the PLL enabled for various frequency division ratios. Resolution bandwidth = 30 kHz.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Spectra of optical beat notes at 6.8 GHz and 850 MHz. The PLL is on. Resolution bandwidth = 30 kHz.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Effect of PLL on phase noise spectra: PLL is disabled (1); “narrow-band” PLL is on (2); “medium-band” PLL is on (3); and “broad-band” PLL is on (4). A power law fit to the “free-running” spectrum gives S ϕ(F) ≃ 3 × 105/F 4 + 100/F 2 rad2/Hz. The filtered spectra are truncated at low frequency, since it was not possible to correctly reproduce them without increasing T obs and N.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Effect of the PLL on the power spectra of simulated beat notes in the case of a purely random phase modulation (a) and a mixture of random phase noise and low-frequency sinusoidal modulation (b): PLL is disabled (1), “narrow-band” PLL is enabled (2), “medium-band” PLL is enabled (3), and “broad-band” PLL is enabled (4).

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Simulated power spectra of frequency-multiplied beat notes: PLL is disabled (1), “narrow-band” PLL is enabled (2), “medium-band” PLL is enabled (3), and “broad-band” PLL is enabled (4). The carrier frequency was 800 kHz, N was 221, and the number of averages was 128. Phase locking with a narrow carrier is observed only in the cases 3 and 4.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Dynamics of the PLL based on the first-order low-pass filter. (a) Frequency difference Δω and phase difference ΔΦ. (b) PLL amplifier output voltage u amp as a function of time.

Image of FIG. 10.
FIG. 10.

Dynamics of the PLL based on an ideal integrator. (a) Frequency difference between two oscillators Δω (open- and close-loop control). (b) Closed-loop phase difference ΔΦ and voltage at the output of the PLL amplifier u amp as a function of time.

Image of FIG. 11.
FIG. 11.

Effect of PLL bandwidth on the magnitude of phase disturbances caused by large-scale variations of Δω. Curves 1, 2, and 3 correspond to the “locked” phase difference computed for progressively increasing bandwidth of the phase control loop.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/rsi/82/8/10.1063/1.3627535
2011-08-31
2014-04-18
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Offset phase locking of noisy diode lasers aided by frequency division
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/82/8/10.1063/1.3627535
10.1063/1.3627535
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM