1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Tuning donut profile for spatial resolution in stimulated emission depletion microscopy
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4799665
/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/4/10.1063/1.4799665
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/4/10.1063/1.4799665
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic of the construction of the CW STED microscope. The excitation was provided by an Ar ion laser (488 nm) and the depletion was from a 592 nm fiber laser. BPF: bandpass filter; VPP: vortex phase plate; L: lenses; P: polarizer; QWP: quarterwave plate; DCSP: dichroic mirror (short pass); NF: notch filter; DCLP: dichroic mirror (long pass); PH: pinhole; APD: avalanche photodiode detector.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Donut profile as a funciton of the depletion beam size. The depletion beam was first passed throught the vortex phase plate to form a donut-profiled beam. The donut beam was then collimated to have a beam diameter of (a) ∼6 mm and (b) ∼3 mm.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Donut profile as a funciton of the depletion beam polarization. (a) Right-handed circular as defined from the point of view of the receiver; (b) linear; and (c) left-handed circular. The vortex phase plate generates a right-handed spiral phase delay viewed from the receiver.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

The effect of the center profile of the donut on STED images. (a) Assumed donut profile with the center portion filled to different levels of the maximum intensity; (b) simulated STED resolution at different filled levels; (c) simulated maximum STED image intensity at corresponding filled levels; and (d) resolution-depletion power relationship at different filled levels. The 340 nm donut was used in the simulation. The excitation and depletion laser powers were assumed to be 15 μW and 1.0 W, respectively.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Other factors affecting STED resolution. Simulated spatial resolution by varying (a) dye fluorescence lifetime; and (b) excitation beam width. The 340 nm donut was used in the simulation. The excitation and depletion laser powers were assumed to be 15 μW and 1 W, respectively.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Confocal and STED point spread function. (a) and (b) Confocal and STED image of 45 nm nanoparticles immobilized on glass surface, respectively; (c) intensity profiles across the images and their Lorentzian fitting of a particle in (a) and (b).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Confocal and STED images of 200 nm nanoparticles immobilized on the water/glass interface in the presence of a blanket of 1-fluoroheptane. (a) Confocal image; (b) original STED image.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/4/10.1063/1.4799665
2013-04-10
2014-04-16
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Tuning donut profile for spatial resolution in stimulated emission depletion microscopy
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/4/10.1063/1.4799665
10.1063/1.4799665
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM