1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Scanning probe microscope simulator for the assessment of noise in scanning probe microscopy controllers
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4812636
/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/7/10.1063/1.4812636
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/7/10.1063/1.4812636
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Schematic view of a STM system. The STM controller adjusts the -position of the tip such that, ideally, the tunneling current matches the setpoint for all , -positions and generates the , positions. The bottom inset shows the ideal tip trajectory, the top inset displays the actual trajectory that suffers from overlaid noise.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Schematic of the scanning probe microscope simulator (SPMS). The SPMS consists of (from left to right) input resistors, limitation diodes, an impedance converter, and the tunneling current diode. The following current-to-voltage converter can be part of the SPMS or separately attached to the feedback system. Optionally, the dynamic response of the mechanical loop of the microscope can be added by closing switch S, where an LC series is connected to ground. Choosing = 25 mH and = 1 μF leads to a scanner resonance of 1 kHz.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

The roughness of the topography as a function of the P-Gain is shown. Low P-Gain values show a strong increase of (Region I) as the feedback system cannot fully zero the error signal. In Region II, the P-Gain values show a saturation of . For high P-Gain values (Region III), the feedback system starts to oscillate and the apparent roughness strongly increases.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) Schematic of the rectangular perturbation signal and the output response. The settling time is the time between the rectangular perturbation signal rise and the output response is within a defined error. (b) Topographic image of the rectangular perturbation signal, with  = 50 mV,  = 36.6 Hz, and P-Gain = 450 pm. (c) Cross section from (b) to extract .

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

The optimal P-Gain value was determined by measuring the minimum settling time for a rectangular perturbation signal. The two outer points of the parabola were estimated as there settling times were not within the time according to a plateau of the rectangular perturbation signal. The minimum P-Gain is around 340 pm.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

The roughness values are shown for two STM controllers, A and B. The extracted for controller A is 1.12 pm, which is approximately two times smaller than  = 1.99 pm for controller B. Controller B was a 20 year old feedback electronic compared to a modern feedback electronic called controller A.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/7/10.1063/1.4812636
2013-07-09
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Scanning probe microscope simulator for the assessment of noise in scanning probe microscopy controllers
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/7/10.1063/1.4812636
10.1063/1.4812636
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM