1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
NAIS: Nuclear activation-based imaging spectroscopy
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1063/1.4815826
/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/7/10.1063/1.4815826
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/7/10.1063/1.4815826

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

The proton-induced nuclear reaction cross section in copper for different reaction types.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Decay curves of four activated copper foils of the stack. The first dashed-dotted line denotes the first copper layer, the dashed line the second, the dotted line the third, and the continuous line the fourth layer.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Schematic of a stack of alternating layers of RCF and copper foils. Below is the autoradiography of activated copper foils using IPs. The energies mean the minimum incidence energies of protons which are necessary for proton induced nuclear reactions in each copper layer.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Gamma-ray decay spectrum after proton-induced activation of the copper foils. The protons were produced by a PHELIX shot. The number of protons was 10 and the maximum energy of the protons was 30 MeV. The upper panel (a) shows the gamma decay spectrum after a measure time of 20 h. (b) shows the spectrum after 20 min according to the time in which the autoradiography is performed. The lower panel (c) denotes the background spectrum of the used high purity germanium detector after 20 h.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

PSL value as a function of the proton induced nuclear reaction yield. The slope of the line of best fit (dashed line) denotes the efficiency of the IP. Used IP type: MM 3.0 without protecting layer from AGFA.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Schematic of the stack of alternating copper foils and RCF. Copper foils are used with different thicknesses (50, 130, 260, and 390 μm). RCFs are used with different sensitivities (MD is more sensitive regarding the protons).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Spatial distribution of protons according to the energy given by each copper layer. The color gradient indicates low particle number (blue) up to high particle number (yellow).

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

Nuclear activations per copper foil. The red dots are reaction yields obtained from autoradiography of copper foils. The blue boxes show the calculated reaction yields using the exponential fit (see text). The steps at foil numbers 4 and 8 result from the different thicknesses (50, 130, and 260 μm) of foils within the stack.

Image of FIG. 9.
FIG. 9.

Comparison of both proton spectra obtained from NAIS and RIS.

Tables

Generic image for table
Table I.

The most proton-induced nuclear reactions with copper in the natural abundance. is the nuclear reaction threshold. σ means the maximum reaction cross section at the energy ).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/7/10.1063/1.4815826
2013-07-22
2014-04-19
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: NAIS: Nuclear activation-based imaging spectroscopy
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/aip/journal/rsi/84/7/10.1063/1.4815826
10.1063/1.4815826
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM