banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Regenerative feedback resonant circuit to detect transient changes in electromagnetic properties of semi-insulating materials
Rent this article for


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Block diagram of regenerative feedback resonant circuit used to monitor transient changes in material properties. Amplifiers have their usual symbol, and BPF denotes “band pass filter.” Upper amplifier is a low noise (LNA) amplifier, while the lower feedback amplifier is a cascade power amplifier stage with excellent isolation.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

(Left) Layout of regenerative feedback resonant circuit with 8.2 GHz split-post dielectric resonator mounted on a thermo-electric cooling system. (Right) Commercial resonant cavities (QWED) used in the circuit: (top) 7.85 GHz dielectric ring resonator and (bottom) 8.2 GHz split-post dielectric resonator.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Illustrations of the sharpening of the resonance that happens as a result of introducing feedback and frequency shift due to material introduction. (a) Comparison of static (VNA) and dynamic (RTSA) resonances for empty and Si-loaded SPDR; (b) VNA signal for unloaded SPDR; (c) VNA signal for Si-loaded SPDR; (d) RTSA average of 10 sweeps for unloaded SPDR; (e) RTSA average of 10 sweeps for Si-loaded SPDR. Insets in (b) through (e) show the full signal (same axes designations as the main figure) while the main portion of each shows a closeup used in determining the -factor.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Digital phosphor spectrum display of regenerative feedback circuit response with silicon wafer inserted into SPDR. (a) Before perturbation; (b) illuminated with red laser pointer; (c) illuminated with Xe camera flashbulb. Note that the frequency content of the flashbulb response continues out to higher frequencies than is shown in this figure.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Resonator experiments with the DRR. (a) Static VNA measurements of empty, YIG-loaded (demagnetized), and YIG-loaded (magnetized); note that a demagnetized YIG-loaded DRR resonates at higher frequency than the empty cavity, but a magnetized YIG-loaded DRR resonates at slightly lower frequency than the empty cavity; (b) static versus dynamic (feedback) measurements for empty (main figure) and demagnetized YIG-loaded (inset) DRR; note the dramatic sharpening of the resonance and slight shift to higher frequency for the empty DRR but large positive frequency shift, resulting in a resonance >8.5 GHz, for the YIG-loaded DRR; (c) RTSA digital phosphor display of a permanent magnet perturbing a YIG-loaded DRR. The center frequency (center of figure) is 8.52146 GHz. It can be seen that interaction with the external magnetic field shifts the feedback resonance to higher frequencies and dampens it.


Generic image for table
Table I.

Measured frequency and Q-factor values for static and dynamic resonator/material configurations.


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Regenerative feedback resonant circuit to detect transient changes in electromagnetic properties of semi-insulating materials