No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Quantitative high dynamic range beam profiling for fluorescence microscopy
1. B. R. Masters, “The development of fluorescence microscopy,” in Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (John Wiley & Sons, 2010), pp. 1–9.
2. K. G. Peters, P. S. Rao, B. S. Bell, and L. A. Kindman, “Green fluorescent fusion proteins: Powerful tools for monitoring protein expression in live zebrafish embryos,” Dev. Biol. 171(1), 252–257 (1995).
3. M. A. A. Neil, R. Juskaitis, and T. Wilson, “Method of obtaining optical sectioning by using structured light in a conventional microscope,” Opt. Lett. 22(24), 1905–1907 (1997).
7. M. Mavrakis, R. Rikhy, M. Lilly, and J. Lippincott-Schwartz, “Fluorescence imaging techniques for studying Drosophila embryo development,” Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 4(4), 18 (2008).
9. R. Tomer, K. Khairy, and P. J. Keller, “Shedding light on the system: Studying embryonic development with light sheet microscopy,” Curr. Opin. Genet. Devel. 21(5), 558–565 (2011).
11. J. M. Taylor, J. M. Girkin, and G. D. Love, “High-resolution 3D optical microscopy inside the beating zebrafish heart using prospective optical gating,” Biomed. Opt. Express 3(12), 3043–3053 (2012).
14. M. J. Nasse, J. C. Woehl, and S. Huant, “High-resolution mapping of the three-dimensional point spread function in the near-focus region of a confocal microscope,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 031106 (2007).
15. R. W. Cole, T. Jinadasa, and C. M. Brown, “Measuring and interpreting point spread functions to determine confocal microscope resolution and ensure quality control,” Nat. Protoc. 6, 1929–1941 (2011).
17. M. Martínez-Corral, “Point spread function engineering in confocal scanning microscopy,” Wave-Opt. Syst. Eng. II 5182, 112–122 (2003).
18. M. A. Neil, R. Juskaitis, T. Wilson, Z. J. Laczik, and V. Sarafis, “Optimized pupil-plane filters for confocal microscope point-spread function engineering,” Opt. Lett. 25, 245–247 (2000).
19. S. K. Nayar and T. Mitsunaga, “High dynamic range imaging: Spatially varying pixel exposures,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662) (IEEE, 2000), Vol. 1, pp. 472–479.
20. P. E. Debevec and J. Malik, “Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs,” in ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 Classes, SIGGRAPH'08 (ACM, New York, 2008), pp. 31–131–10).
21. K. Greger, J. Swoger, and E. H. K. Stelzer, “Basic building units and properties of a fluorescence single plane illumination microscope,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78(2), 023705 (2007).
24. G. E. Forsythe, M. A. Malcolm, and C. B. Moler, in Computer Methods for Mathematical Computations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977), Chap. 7.2.
25. C. Bourgenot, C. D. Saunter, J. M. Taylor, J. M. Girkin, and G. D. Love, “3D adaptive optics in a light sheet microscope,” Opt. Express 20(12), 13252 (2012).
Article metrics loading...
Modern developmental biology relies on optically sectioning fluorescence microscope techniques to produce non-destructive in vivo images of developing specimens at high resolution in three dimensions. As optimal performance of these techniques is reliant on the three-dimensional (3D) intensity profile of the illumination employed, the ability to directly record and analyze these profiles is of great use to the fluorescence microscopist or instrument builder. Though excitation beam profiles can be measured indirectly using a sample of fluorescent beads and recording the emission along the microscope detection path, we demonstrate an alternative approach where a miniature camera sensor is used directly within the illumination beam. Measurements taken using our approach are solely concerned with the illumination optics as the detection optics are not involved. We present a miniature beam profiling device and high dynamic range flux reconstruction algorithm that together are capable of accurately reproducing quantitative 3D flux maps over a large focal volume. Performance of this beam profiling system is verified within an optical test bench and demonstrated for fluorescence microscopy by profiling the low NA illumination beam of a single plane illumination microscope. The generality and success of this approach showcases a widely flexible beam amplitude diagnostic tool for use within the life sciences.
Full text loading...
Most read this month