No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Experimental comparison of sonoporation and electroporation in cell transfection applications
1.Anderson, S. F. (1992). “Human gene therapy,” Science 256, 808–813.
2.Bao, S. , Thrall, B. D. , and Miller, D. L. (1997). “Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro,” Ultrasound Med. Biol. 23, 953–959.
3.Beissner, K. (1992). “Radiation force and force balance,” in Ultrasonic Exposimetry, edited by M. Ziskin and P. Lewin (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL).
4.Chow, C. W. , Rincon, M. , and Davis, R. J. (1999). “Requirement for transcription factor NFAT in interleukin-2 expression,” Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 2300–2307.
5.Eksioglu-Demiralp, E. , Kitada, S. , Carson, D. , Garland, J. , Andreef, M. , and Reed, J. C. (2003). “A method for functional evaluation of caspase activation pathways in intact lymphoid cells using electroporation-mediated protein delivery and flow cytometric analysis,” J. Immunol. Methods 275, 41–56.
6.Givan, A. L. (1992). Flow Cytometry, 2nd ed. (Wiley-Liss, New York).
7.Gormley, G. , and Wu, J. (1998). “Observation of acoustic streaming near Albunex spheres,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 3115–3118.
8.Greenleaf, W. J. , Bolander, M. E. , Sarkar, G. , Goldring, M. B. , and Greenleaf, J. F. (1998). “Artificial cavitation nuclei significantly enhance acoustically induced cell transfection,” Ultrasound Med. Biol. 24, 587–595.
9.Lawrie, A. , Brisken, A. F. , and Francis, S. E. (2000). “Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound for vascular gene delivery,” Gene Ther. 7, 2023–2027.
10.Lu, Q. L. , Liang, H. D. , Partridge, T. , and Blomley, M. J. (2003). “Microbubble ultrasound improves the efficiency of gene transduction in skeletal muscle in vivo with reduced tissue damage,” Gene Ther. 10, 396–405.
11.Miller, D. L. , Bao, S. , and Morris, J. E. (1999). “Sonoporation of cultured cells in the rotating tube exposure system,” Ultrasound Med. Biol. 25, 143–149.
12.Miller, D. L. , Dou, C. , and Song, J. (2003). “DNA transfer and cell killing in epidermoid cells by diagnostic ultrasound activation of contrast agent gas bodies in vitro,” Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29, 601–607.
13.NCRP (2002). Exposure Criteria for Medical Diagnostic Ultrasound. II. Criteria based on All Known Mechanisms (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland.)
14.Neumann, E. (1989). “The relaxation hysteresis of membrane electroporation,” in Electroporation & Electrofusion in Cell Biology, edited by E. Neumann, A. E. Sowers, and C. A. Jordan (Plenum, New York).
15.Ross, J. P. , Cai, X. , Chiu, J. F. , Yang, J. , and Wu, J. (2002). “Optical and atomic force microscopic studies on sonoporation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1161–1164.
16.Ward, M. , Wu, J. , and Chiu, J. F. (1999). “Ultrasound-induced cell lysis and sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 2951–2957.
17.Wong, T. K. , and Neumann, E. (1982). “Electric field mediated gene transfer,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 107, 584–587.
18.Wu, J. , and Tong, J. (1998). “Experimental study of stability of contrast agents,” Ultrasound Med. Biol. 24, 257–265.
19.Wu, J. , Ross, J. R. , and Chiu, J. F. (2002). “Reparable sonoporation generated by microstreaming,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1460–1464.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...