No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Investigation into the uniqueness of neonate transient otoacoustic emissions
1.R. C. Bilger, M. L. Matthies, D. R. Hammel, and M. E. Demorest, “Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 33, 418–432 (1990).
2.M. L. Whitehead, N. Kamal, B. L. Lonsbury-Martin, and G. K. Martin, “Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in different racial groups,” Scand. Audiol. 22, 3–10 (1993).
3.S. Kapadia and M. E. Lutman, “Are normal hearing thresholds a sufficient condition for click-evoked otoacoustic emissions?” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3566–3576 (1997).
4.M. E. Lutman, A. C. Davis, H. M. Fortnum, and S. Wood, “Field Screening of Targeted Neonatal Hearing Screening by Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions,” Ear Hear. 18(4), 265–276 (1997).
5.Y. Cope and M. E. Lutman, “Oto-acoustic Emissions,” in Paediatric Audiology 0–5 years, edited by B. McCormick (Taylor & Francis, London, 1988), pp. 221–245.
6.P. Bray and D. T. Kemp, “An advanced cochlea echo suitable for infant screening,” Br. J. Audiol. 21, 191–204 (1987).
7.C Discrete Fourier Transform Library, The fastest Fourier transform in the west (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2003), http://www.fftw.org.
8.R. A. Johnson and D. W. Wichern, Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992).
9.G. J. MacLachan and T. Krishnan, The EM Algorithm and Extensions (Wiley, New York, 1997).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...