Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing
1.Baer, T. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1993). “Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 1229–1241.
2.Baer, T. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1994). “Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2277–2280.
3.Boothroyd, A. , Mulhearn, B. , Gong, J. , and Ostroff, J. (1996). “Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 1807–1818.
4.Brill, S. , Gstöttner, W. , Helms, J. , v.Ilberg, C. , Baumgartener, W. , Müller, J. , and Keifer, J. (1997). “Optimization of channel number and stimulation rate for the fast continuous interleaved sampling strategy in the COMBI 40+,” American Journal of Otology 18 (Suppl.), S104–S106.
5.Chatterjee, M. , and Shannon, R. V. (1998). “Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 2565–2572.
6.Cochlear Corporation (1995). Audiologist Handbook (Englewood, CO).
7.Cohen, R. L. , and Keith, R. W. (1976). “Use of low-pass noise in word recognition,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 19, 48–54.
8.Cooper, J. C. , and Cutts, B. P. (1971). “Speech discrimination in noise,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 14, 332–337.
9.Dirks, D. D. , Morgan, D. E. , and Dubno, J. R. (1982). “A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition,” J. Speech Hear. Disorders 47, 114–123.
10.Dorman, M. F. , and Loizou, P. C. (1997). “Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for normal-hearing listeners and patients with cochlear implants,” Am. J. Otol. 18, S113–S114.
11.Dorman, M. F. , and Loizou, P. C. (1998). “Identification of consonants and vowels by cochlear implant patients using a 6-channel continuous interleaved sampling processor and by normal-hearing subjects using simulations processors with two to nine channels,” Ear and Hearing 19, 162–166.
12.Dorman, M. F. , Loizou, P. C. , and Rainey, D. (1997). “Speech understanding as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2403–2411.
13.Dowell, R. C. , Seligman, P. M. , Blamey, P. J. , and Clark, G. M. (1987). “Speech perception using a two-formant 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis in quiet and in noise,” Acta Oto-Laryngol. 104, 439–446.
14.Dubno, J. R. , and Dorman, M. F. (1987). “Effects of spectral flattening on vowel identification,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 1503–1511.
15.Fishman, K. , Shannon, R. V. , and Slattery, W. H. (1997). “Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 40, 1201–1215.
16.Fu, Q.-J. , and Shannon, R. V. (1998). “Effects of amplitude nonlinearities on speech recognition by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.104, 2570–2577.
17.Hanekom J. J. , and Shannon R. V. (1996). “Place pitch discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users,”South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 27–40.
18.Hanekom, J. J. , and Shannon, R. V. (1998). “Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.104, 2372–2384.
19.Hillenbrand, J. , Getty, L. A. , Clark, M. J. , and Wheeler, K. (1995). “Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3099–3111.
20.Hochberg, I. , Boothroyd, A. , Weiss, M. , and Hellman, S. (1992). “Effects of noise and noise suppression on speech perception by cochlear implant users,” Ear and Hearing 13, 263–271.
21.Horst, J. W. (1987). “Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 874–885.
22.Kiefer, J. , Müller, J. , Pfennigdorf, T. , Schön, F. , Helms, J. , von Ilberg, C. , Gstöttner, W. , Ehrenberger, K. , Arnold, W. , Stephan, K. , Thumfart, W. , and Baur, S. (1996). “Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (Med-El Combi-40) compared to the Multipeak and Spectral peak strategies (Nucleus),” ORL 58, 127–135.
23.McDermott, H. J. , McKay, C. M. , and Vandali, A. E. (1992a). “A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited Multichannel cochlear implant,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 3367–3371.
24.McDermott, H. J. , McKay, C. M. , Vandali, A. E. , and Clark, G. M. (1992b). “A comparison of speech perception of cochlear implantees using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the MSP (Multipeak) processor,” Acta Oto-Laryngol. 112, 752–761.
25.Miller, G. , and Nicely, P. (1955). “An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 338–352.
26.Moore, B. C. J. (1995). Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage (Oxford U.P., New York) (with accompanying CD of audio demonstrations).
27.Müller-Deiler, J. , Schmidt, B. J. , and Rudert, H. (1995). “Effects of noise on speech discrimination in cochlear implant patients,” Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 166, 303–306.
28.Nejime, Y. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1997). “Simulation of the effect of threshold elevation and loudness recruitment combined with reduced frequency selectivity on the intelligibility of speech in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 603–615.
29.Nilsson, M., Soli, S., and Masuda, A. (1998). “A definition of normal binaural sentence recognition in quiet and noise,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol. (in press).
30.Plomp, R. , and Mimpen, A. M. (1979). “Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66, 1333–1342.
31.Rosen, S., Faulkner, A., and Wilkinson, L. (1997). “Perceptual adaptation by normal listeners to upward shifts of spectral information in speech and its relevance for users of cochlear implants,” in Speech, Hearing, and Language: Work in Progress (Phonetics and Linguistics, University College, London), Vol. 10.
32.Shannon, R. V. , Adams, D. D. , Ferrel, R. L. , Palumbo, R. L. , and Grandgenett, M. (1990). “A computer interface for psychophysical and speech research with the Nucleus cochlear implant,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 905–907.
33.Shannon, R. V. , Zeng, F-G. , Kamath, V. , Wygonski, J. , and Ekelid, M. (1995). “Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues,” Science 270, 303–304.
34.Skinner, M. W. , Clark, G. M. , Whitford, L. A. , et al. (1994). “Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus-22 channel cochlear implant system,” Am J. Otol. 15, 15–27.
35.Stelmachowicz, P. G. , Jesteadt, W. , Gorga, M. P. , and Mott, J. (1985). “Speech perception ability and psychophysical tuning curves in hearing impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 620–627.
36.Studebaker, G. A. , Taylor, R. , and Sherbecoe, R. L. (1994). “The effect of noise spectrum on speech recognition performance-intensity functions,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 37, 439–448.
37.ter Keurs, M. , Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1992). “Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. I,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2872–2880.
38.ter Keurs, M. , Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1993). “Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 1547–1552.
39.Turner, C. W. , and Henn, C. C. (1989). “The relation between vowel recognition and measures of frequency resolution,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 32, 49–58.
40.Van Hoesel, R. J. , and Clark, G. M. (1995a). “Evaluation of a portable two-microphone adaptive beamforming speech processor with cochlear implant patients,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 2498–2503.
41.Van Hoesel, R. J. , and Clark, G. M. (1995b). “Manikin and cochlear implant patient test results with a portable adaptive beamforming processor to suppress the effect of noise,” Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 166, 144–146.
42.Van Hoesel, R. J. , and Clark, G. M. (1997). “Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 495–507.
43.Van Hoesel, R. J. , Tong, Y. C. , Hollow, R. D. , and Clark, G. M. (1993). “Psychophysical and speech perception studies: A case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 3178–3189.
44.Van Tasell, D. J. , and Yanz, J. L (1987). “Speech recognition threshold in noise: Effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 30, 377–386.
45.Van Tasell, D. J. , Larsen, S. Y. , and Fabry, D. A. (1988). “Effects of an adaptive filter hearing aid on speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired subjects,” Ear and Hearing 9, 15–21.
46.Weiss, M. R (1993). “Effects of noise and noise reduction processing on the operation of the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant processor,” J. Rehab. Res. Develop. 30, 117–128.
47.Wilson, B. S. , Finley, C. C. , Lawson, D. T. , Wolford, R. D. , Eddington, D. K. , and Rabinowitz, W. M. (1991). “New levels of speech recognition with cochlear implants,” Nature (London) 352, 236–238.
48.Yost, W. A., and Sheft, S. (1993). “Auditory perception,” in Human Psychophysics, edited by W. A. Yost, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 193–236.
Article metrics loading...