Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production
1.Alwan, A. , Narayanan, S. , and Haker, K. (1997). “Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. Part II. The rhotics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 1078–1089.
2.Boyce, S. , and Espy-Wilson, C. Y. (1997). “Coarticulatory stability in American English /r/,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3741–3753.
3.Browman, C., and Goldstein, L. (1990a). “Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech,” in Papers in laboratory phonology. I: Between the grammar and physics of speech, edited by J. Kingston and M. E. Beckman (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), pp. 341–376.
4.Browman, C. , and Goldstein, L. (1990b). “Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures,” J. Phonetics 18, 299–320.
5.De Jong, K. J. (1997). “Labiovelar compensation in back vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 2221–2233.
6.Delattre, P. , Freeman, D. C. (1968). “A dialect study of American r’s by x-ray motion picture,” Linguistics 44, 29–68.
7.Espy-Wilson, C. Y. , and Boyce, S. E. (1994). “Acoustic differences between “bunched” and “retroflex” variants of American English /r/,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2823.
8.Espy-Wilson, C. Y., Narayanan, S., Boyce, S. E., and Alwan, A. (1997). “Acoustic modeling of American English /r/,” Proceedings of Eurospeech, September 1997, Rhodes, Greece (ESCA, Grenoble, France), Vol. 1, pp. 393–396.
9.Fowler, C. A. (1986). “An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective,” J. Phonetics 14, 3–28.
10.Fowler, C. A. (1996). “Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 1730–1740.
11.Guenther, F. H. (1995). “A modeling framework for speech motor development and kinematic articulator control,” Proceedings of the XIIIth International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (KTH and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden), Vol. 2, pp. 92–99.
12.Guenther, F. H. , Hampson, M. , and Johnson, D. (1998). “A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements,” Psychol. Rev. 105, 611–633.
13.Hagiwara, R. (1994). “Three types of American /r/,” UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 88, 63–90.
14.Hagiwara, R. (1995). “Acoustic realizations of American /r/ as produced by women and men,” UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 90, 1–187.
15.Jakobson, R., Fant, G., and Halle, M. (1951). Preliminaries to speech analysis: The distinctive features and their correlates (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
16.Johnson, K. , Ladefoged, P. , and Lindau, M. (1993). “Individual differencs in vowel production,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 701–714.
17.Liberman, A. M. , Cooper, F. S. , Shankweiler, D. P. , and Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). “Perception of the speech code,” Psychol. Rev. 74, 431–461.
18.Liberman, A. M. , and Mattingly, I. G. (1985). “The motor theory of speech revisited,” Cognition 21, 1–36.
19.Maeda, S. (1990). “Compensatory articulation during speech: Evidence from the analysis and synthesis of vocal tract shapes using an articulatory model,” in Speech Production and Speech Modeling, edited by W. J. Hardcastle and A. Marchal (Kluwer Academic, Boston), pp. 131–149.
20.Ong, D. , and Stone, M. (1998). “Three-dimensional vocal tract shapes in /r/ and /l/: A study of MRI, ultrasound, electropalatography, and acoustics,” Phonoscope 1, 1–13.
21.Perkell, J. , Cohen, M. , Svirsky, M. , Matthies, M. , Garabieta, I. , and Jackson, M. (1992). “Electromagnetic midsagittal articulometer (EMMA) systems for transducing speech articulatory movements,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 3078–3096.
22.Perkell, J. S. , Matthies, M. L. , Lane, H. , Guenther, F. H. , Wilhelms-Tricarico, R. , Wozniak, J. , and Guiod, P. (1997). “Speech motor control: Acoustic segmental goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models,” Speech Commun. 22, 227–250.
23.Perkell, J. S. , Matthies, M. L. , and Svirsky, M. A. (1994). “Articulatory evidence for acoustic goals for consonants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 3326.
24.Perkell, J. S. , Matthies, M. L. , Svirsky, M. A. , and Jordan, M. I. (1993). “Trading relations between tongue-body raising and lip rounding in production of the vowel [u]: A pilot “motor equivalence” study,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2948–2961.
25.Perkell, J. S. , Matthies, M. L. , Svirsky, M. A. , and Jordan, M. I. (1995). “Goal-based speech motor control: A theoretical framework and some preliminary data,” J. Phonetics 23, 23–35.
26.Saltzman, E. L. , and Munhall, K. G. (1989). “A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production,” Ecological Psychol. 1, 333–382.
27.Savariaux, C. , Perrier, P. , and Orliaguet, J. P. (1995a). “Compensation strategies for the perturbation of the rounded vowel [u] using a lip tube: A study of the control space in speech production,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2428–2442.
28.Savariaux, C., Perrier, P., and Schwartz, J. L. (1995b). “Perceptual analysis of compensatory strategies in the production of the French rounded vowel [u] perturbed by a lip tube,” in Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (KTH and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden), Vol. 3, pp. 584–587.
29.Stevens, K. (1998). Acoustic Phonetics (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
30.Westbury, J. R., Hashi, M., and Lindstrom, M. J. (1995). “Differences among speakers in articulation of American English /r/: An x-ray microbeam study,” Proceedings of the XIIIth International Conference of Phonetic Sciences (KTH and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden), Vol. 4, pp. 50–57.
31.Westbury, J. R. , Hashi, M. , and Lindstrom, M. J. (1998). “Differences among speakers in lingual articulation of American English /ɹ/,” Speech Commun. 26, 203–226.
Article metrics loading...