Full text loading...
Abstract exercises in cochlear modeling: Reply to “What should be the goals of cochlear modeling?” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 3054 (1997)]
1.Chadwick, R. S. (1997). “What should be the goals of cochlear modeling?,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 3054.
2.de Boer, E. (1996). “Mechanics of the cochlea: Modeling efforts,” in The Cochlea, edited by P. Dallos, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 258–317.
3.de Boer, E. (1997a). “Classical and nonclassical models of the cochlea,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 2148–2150.
4.de Boer, E. (1997b). “Cochlear models and minimum phase,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 3810–3813.
5.Kanis, L. J. , and de Boer, E. (1997). “Frequency dependence of acoustic distortion products in a locally active model of the cochlea,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 1527–1531.
6.Kim, D. O., Neely, S. T., Molnar, C. E., and Matthews, J. W. (1980). “An active cochlear model with negative damping in the partition: Comparison with Rhode’s ante- and post-mortem observations,” in Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioral Studies in Hearing, edited by G. v.d. Brink and F. A. Bilsen (Delft U. P., Delft), pp. 7–14.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Article metrics loading...