Volume 107, Issue 2, February 2000
Index of content:
- UNDERWATER SOUND 
107(2000); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.428257View Description Hide Description
An approach for avoiding the problem of environmental uncertainty is tested using data from the TESPEX experiments. Acoustic data basing is an alternative to the difficult task of characterizing the environment by performing direct measurements and solving inverse problems. A source is towed throughout the region of interest to obtain a database of the acoustic field on an array of receivers. With this approach, there is no need to determine environmental parameters or solve the wave equation. Replica fields from an acoustic database are used to perform environmental source tracking [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 3335–3341 (1993)], which exploits environmental complexity and source motion.
107(2000); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.428258View Description Hide Description
Internal waves of a given strength will produce acoustic effects that vary from water mass to water mass. Presented here is a means of predicting the strength of acoustic fluctuations due to internal waves, given the basic climatology, that is, measurements of depth, temperature, and salinity of an oceanic region. An acoustic fluctuation strength parameter F is defined as the ratio of the fractional potential sound-speed change to the fractional potential-density change. Here F is calculated at three depth levels (275, 550, and 850 m), on a one-degree grid of latitude and longitude, using NODC/OCL’s World Ocean Atlas 1994. Representative values of F are presented for 15 upper water masses that range from in the North Pacific to in the North Atlantic, with a typical value for most of the upper waters being Results for two depth levels within 12 intermediate water masses range from in the North Pacific to in the North Atlantic, with a typical value of although there is considerable variation. In general, F exhibits higher values in the Atlantic Basin than in the Indian or Pacific, and has a maximum at 550 m. The main use of F will be the prediction of travel-time fluctuations in acoustic propagation experiments, which will be proportional to the value of F, given a universal strength of internal waves.
107(2000); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.428259View Description Hide Description
A year of surf noise observations in the very near shore region of La Jolla Shores beach are presented. Ambient sound levels and surface wave height were recorded for 9 min every hour from July 1997 through June 1998 at a monitoring station located 360 m seaward of the beach in 8-m deep water. Sound segments that were dominated by the noise from breaking surf formed the basis of a correlation analysis between surf noise level and wave height, wave period, wind speed, and mean water depth. The analysis shows that surf noise is primarily determined by wave height, and scales approximately with the wave height squared. The surface wave energy flux onto the beach also scales with wave height squared, leading to the conclusion that the conversion of the mechanical energy of the surface wave field into noiseenergy is approximately constant. In fact, the ratio of noiseenergy to surface wave energy flux varies by up to a factor of 3 over the range of energy fluxes considered (100–3000 W per m).
107(2000); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.428253View Description Hide Description
Bubble plumes of various void fractions and sizes were produced by varying the flow velocity of a water jet impinging normally on a water surface. The bubbles entrained at the surface were carried downwards by the fluid flow to depths ranging from 33 to 65 cm, and formed roughly cylindrical plumes with diameters ranging from 12 to 27 cm. The acoustic emissions from the plumes were recorded onto digital audio tape using a hydrophone placed outside the cloud at distances ranging from 50 cm to 16.0 m. Closeup video images of the individual bubbles within the plume were also taken in order to gain knowledge of the bubble size distributions. The experiments were performed in both fresh-water and salt-water environments. The fresh-water clouds emitted sounds with a modal structure that was significantly different from that produced by the salt-water clouds. Furthermore, the smaller bubbles present in the salt-water clouds have a fundamental effect on the amplification of turbulencenoise, generating sound at significant levels for frequencies up to several hundred Hertz.