Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Reply to “An analytical error invalidates the ‘depolarization’ of the perceptual magnet effect” [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 3576–3577 (2000)]
1.Green, D. M., and Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Wiley, New York).
2.Grieser, D. , and Kuhl, P. K. (1989). “Categorization of speech by infants: Support for speech-sound prototypes,” Dev. Psychol. 25, 577–588.
3.Guenther, F. H. (2000). “An analytical error invalidates the ‘depolarization’ of the perceptual magnet effect,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 3576–3577.
4.Harnad, S., Hanson, S. J., and Lubin, J. (1995). “Categorical perception and the evolution of supervised learning in neural nets,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Machine Learning of Natural Language and Ontology, edited by D. W. Powers and L. Uhr (DFKI, Kaiserslautern, Germany), pp. 65–74.
5.Iverson, P. , and Kuhl, P. K. (1995). “Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 553–562.
6.Kewley-Port, D. , and Neel, A. T. (1998). “Relation between discrimination and identification of English vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 2983.
7.Kuhl, P. K. (1991). “Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnet effect’ for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not,” Percept. Psychophys. 50, 93–107.
8.Kuhl, P. K. , Williams, K. A. , Lacerda, F. , Stevens, K. N. , and Lindblom, B. (1992). “Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age,” Science 255, 606–608.
9.Liberman, A. M. , Harris, K. S. , Hoffman, H. S. , and Griffith, B. C. (1957). “The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries,” J. Exp. Psychol. 54, 358–368.
10.Lively, S. E. , and Pisoni, D. B. (1995). “On prototypes and phonetic categories: A critical assessment of the perceptual magnet effect in speech perception,” J. Exp. Psych.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 23, 1665–1679.
11.Livingston, K. R. , Andrews, J. K. , and Harnad, S. (1998). “Categorical perception effects induced by categorical learning,” J. Exp. Psych.: Learning Memory and Cognition 24, 732–753.
12.Lotto, A. J. , Kluender, K. R. , and Holt, L. L. (1998). “Depolarizing the perceptual magnet effect,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3648–3655.
13.Pisoni, D. B. (1971). “On the nature of categorical perception of speech sounds,” Doctoral Thesis, University of Michigan.
14.Renda, S. C. , Hawks, J. W. , and Klich, R. (1995). “An investigation of the perceptual magnet effect in adults,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3420.
15.Sharma, A. , and Dorman, M. F. (1998). “Exploration of the perceptual magnet effect using the mismatch negativity auditory evoked potential,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 511–517.
16.Wood, C. C. (1976). “Discriminability, response bias, and phoneme categories in discrimination of voice onset time,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 60, 1381–1389.
Article metrics loading...