Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Predicting reverberation times in a simulated classroom
1.W. C. Sabine, Collected Papers on Acoustics (Peninsula, Los Altos, CA, 1992), pp. 43–52.
2.C. F. Eyring, “Methods of calculating the average coefficient of sound absorption,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 4, 178–192 (1933).
3.G. Millington, “A modified formula for reverberation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 4, 69–82 (1932).
4.L. Cremer and H. A. Müller, Principles and Applications of Room Acoustics (Applied Science, London, 1982), Vol. 1, p. 235.
5.H. Kuttruff, “Sound decay in enclosures with non-diffuse sound field,” in Proceedings of the Wallace Clement Sabine Centennial Symposium, Cambridge, MA, 5–7 June 1994 (Acoustical Society of America, Woodbury, NY), pp. 85–88.
6.D. Fitzroy, “Reverberation formula which seems to be more accurate with nonuniform distribution of absorption,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31, 893–897 (1959).
7.H. Arau-Puchades, “An improved reverberation formula,” Acustica 65, 163–180 (1988).
8.S. R. Bistafa and J. S. Bradley, “Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 861–875 (2000).
9.H. Kuttruff, Room Acoustics (Elsevier Applied Science, London, 1991), pp. 204–207, 123–128, 118–120, 255.
10.RAYNOISE is registered trademark of LMS Numerical Technologies NV, Leuven, Belgium.
11.ODEON is the main part of a room acoustic modeling system developed at the Department of Acoustic Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
12.S. M. Dance and B. M. Shield, “Modeling of sound fields in enclosed spaces with absorbent room surfaces,” Appl. Acoust. 58, 1–18 (1999).
13.H. Kuttruff, “A simple iteration scheme for the computing of decay constants in enclosures with diffusely reflecting boundaries,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 288–293 (1995).
14.J. S. Bradley, “An international comparison of room acoustics measurement systems,” Report IR-714 (National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1996).
15.M. Hodgson, “On measures to increase sound-field diffuseness and the applicability of diffuse-field theory,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3651–3653 (1994).
16.A. M. Ondet and J. L. Barbry, “Modeling of sound propagation in fitted workshops using ray tracing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 787–796 (1989).
17.E. Mommertz and M. Vorländer, “Measurement of scattering coefficients of surfaces in the reverberation chamber and in the free field,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Acoustics, Trondheim, Norway, 26–30 June 1995, pp. 577–580.
18.H. A. Akil, “The scattering of sound by fittings in industrial buildings,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool, UK, 1995.
19.G. Benedetto, E. Brosio, and R. Spagnolo, “The effect of stationary diffusers in the measurement of sound absorption coefficients in a reverberation room: An experimental study,” Appl. Acoust. 14, 49–63 (1981).
20.M. Hodgson, “When is diffuse-field theory applicable?,” Appl. Acoust. 49, 197–207 (1996).
21.M. Vorländer, “International round robin on room acoustics computer simulations,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Acoustics, Trondheim, Norway, 26–30 June 1995, pp. 689–692.
Article metrics loading...