Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants
1.Arndt, P., Staller, S., Arcaroli, J., Hines, A., and Ebinger, K. (1999). Within subject comparison of advanced coding strategies in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant (Cochlear Corporation, Englewood, CO).
2.Baer, T. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1993). “Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 1229–1241.
3.Baer, T. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1994). “Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2277–2280.
4.Boothroyd, A. , Mulhearn, B. , Gong, J. , and Ostroff, J. (1996). “Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 1807–1818.
5.Breeuwer, M. , and Plomp, R. (1984). “Speechreading supplemented with frequency-selective sound-pressure information,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 686–691.
6.Chatterjee, M., and Robert, M. (2001). “Noise enhances modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant listeners: Stochastic resonance in a prosthetic sensory system?,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2(2) (in press).
7.Chatterjee, M. , and Shannon, R. V. (1998). “Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 2565–2572.
8.Clarion by Advanced Bionics (1998). “SCLIN 98 for windows device fitting manual,” Sylmar, California.
9.Cochlear Corporation (1995). Audiologist Handbook (Englewood, CO).
10.Collins, L. M. , Zwolan, T. A. , and Wakefield, G. H. (1997). “Comparison of electrode discrimination pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 440–455.
11.Collins, L., Zwolan, T., O’Neill, J., and Wakefield, G. (1994). “Analysis of electrode pair confusions and implications for speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners,” in Abstracts of the Seventeenth Midwinter Meeting, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, edited by D. Lim, p. 161.
12.Donaldson, G. S. , and Nelson, D. A. (2000). “Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 1645–1658.
13.Dorman, M. F. , and Loizou, P. C. (1997). “Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for normal-hearing listeners and patients with cochlear implants,” Am. J. Otol. Suppl. 18, S113–S114.
14.Dorman, M. F. , and Loizou, P. C. (1998). “Identification of consonants and vowels by cochlear implant patients using a 6-channel continuous interleaved sampling processor and by normal-hearing subjects using simulations processors with two to nine channels,” Ear Hear. 19, 162–166.
15.Dorman, M. F. , Loizou, P. C. , and Rainey, D. (1997). “Speech understanding as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 2403–2411.
16.Dorman, M. F. , Dankowski, K. , McCandless, G. , and Smith, L. M. (1989). “Consonant recognition as a function of the number of channels of stimulation by patients who use the Symbion cochlear implant,” Ear Hear. 10, 288–291.
17.Dubno, J. R. , and Dorman, M. F. (1987). “Effects of spectral flattening on vowel identification,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 1503–1511.
18.Eddington, D. K., Rabinowitz, W. R., Tierney, J., Noel, V., and Whearty, M. (1997). “Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses,” 8th Quarterly Progress Report, NIH Contract N01-DC-6-2100.
19.Fishman, K. , Shannon, R. V. , and Slattery, W. H. (1997). “Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 40, 1201–1215.
20.Fu, Q.-J. (1997). “Speech Perception in Acoustic and Electric Hearing,” doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
21.Fu, Q.-J. , and Shannon, R. V. (1999a). “Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 1889–1900.
22.Fu, Q.-J., and Shannon, R. V. (1999b). “Recognition of spectrally degraded speech in noise with nonlinear amplitude mapping,” in Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Vol. 1, pp. 369–372.
23.Fu, Q. J. , Shannon, R. V. , and Wang, X. (1998). “Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 3586–3596.
24.Geier, L. V. , and Norton, S. (1992). “The effect of limiting the number of Nucleus 22 cochlear implant electrodes programmed on speech perception,” Ear Hear. 13, 340–348.
25.Greenwood, D. D. (1990). “A cochlear frequency-position function for several species—29 years later,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 2592–2605.
26.Hanekom, J. J. , and Shannon, R. V. (1996). “Place pitch discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users,” S. African J. Com. Dis. 43, 27–40.
27.Hanekom, J. J. , and Shannon, R. V. (1998). “Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 2372–2384.
28.Henry, B. A. , McKay, C. M. , McDermott, H. J. , and Clark, G. M. (2000). “The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1269–1280.
29.Hill, F. J. , McRae, L. P. , and McClellan, R. P. (1968). “Speech recognition as a function of channel capacity in a discrete set of channels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 13–18.
30.Hillenbrand, J. , Getty, L. A. , Clark, M. J. , and Wheeler, K. (1995). “Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 3099–3111.
31.Holmes, A. , Kemker, F. J. , and Merwin, G. (1987). “The effects of varying the number of cochlear implant electrodes on speech perception,” Am. J. Otol. 8, 240–246.
32.Horst, J. W. (1987). “Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 874–885.
33.House Ear Institute and Cochlear Corporation (1996). Minimum Speech Test Battery for Adult Cochlear Implant Users CD.
34.Kileny, P. , Zimmerman-Phillips, S. , Zwolan, T. , and Kemink, J. (1992). “Effects of channel number and place of stimulation on performance with the cochlear corporation multichannel implant,” Am. J. Otol. 13, 117–123.
35.Kileny, P. R. , Zwolan, T. A. , Telian, S. A. , and Boerst, A. (1998). “Performance with the lateral wall cochlear implant,” Am. J. Otol. 19, 313–319.
36.Lawson, D. , Wilson, B. , and Finley, C. (1993). “New processing strategies for multichannel cochlear prosthesis,” Prog. Brain Res. 97, 313–321.
37.Lawson, D., Wilson, B. S., Zerbi, M., and Finley, C. C. (1996). “Speech Processors of auditory prostheses,” Third Quarterly Progress Report, NIH Contract NO1-DC-5-2103.
38.McDermott, H. J. , McKay, C. M. , and Vandali, A. E. (1992a). “A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited Multichannel cochlear implant,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 3367–3371.
39.McDermott, H. J. , McKay, C. M. , Vandali, A. E. , and Clark, G. M. (1992b). “A comparison of speech perception of cochlear implantees using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the MSP (Multipeak) processor,” Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockholm) 112, 752–761.
40.McKay, C. M. , O’Brien, A. , and James, C. J. (1999). “Effect of current level on electrode discrimination in electrical stimulation,” Hear. Res. 136, 159–164.
41.Miller, G. , and Nicely, P. (1955). “An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 338–352.
42.Nejime, Y. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1997). “Simulation of the effect of threshold elevation and loudness recruitment combined with reduced frequency selectivity on the intelligibility of speech in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 603–615.
43.Nelson, D. A. , VanTassell, D. J. , Schroeder, A. C. , Soli, S. , and Levine, S. (1995). “Electrode ranking of ‘place pitch’ and speech recognition in electric hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1987–1999.
44.Nilsson, M. , Soli, S. , and Sullivan, J. A. (1994). “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1085–1099.
45.Pfingst, B. E. , Holloway, L. A. , Zwolan, T. A. , and Collins, L. M. (1999). “Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implants,” Hear. Res. 134, 105–115.
46.Robert, M. E. (1998). “CONDOR: Documentation for Identification Test Program,” (House Ear Institute, Los Angeles).
47.Rubinstein, J. T. , Wilson, B. S. , Finley, C. C. , and Abbas, P. J. (1999). “Pseudospontaneous activity: Stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation,” Hear. Res. 127, 108–118.
48.Seligman, P. , and McDermott, H. (1995). “Architecture of the Spectra 22 Speech Processor,” Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. Suppl. 104, 139–141.
49.Shannon, R. V. , Zeng, F.-G. , and Wygonski, J. (1998). “Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 2467–2476.
50.Shannon, R. V. , Jensvold, A. , Padilla, M. , Robert, M. , and Wang, X. (1999). “Consonant recordings for speech testing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. (ARLO) 106, L71–L74.
51.Shannon, R. V. , Zeng, F-G. , Kamath, V. , Wygonski, J. , and Ekelid, M. (1995). “Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues,” Science 270, 303–304.
52.Skinner, M. W. , Holden, L. K. , Holden, T. A. , Demorest, M. E. , and Fourakis, M. S. (1997). “Speech recognition at simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3766–3782.
53.Stelmachowicz, P. G. , Jesteadt, W. , Gorga, M. P. , and Mott, J. (1985). “Speech perception ability and psychophysical tuning curves in hearing impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 620–627.
54.ter Keurs, M. , Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1992). “Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception I,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2872–2880.
55.ter Keurs, M. , Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1993). “Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 1547–1552.
56.Throckmorton, C. S. , and Collins, L. M. (1999). “Investigation of the effects of temporal and spacial interactions on speech-recognition skills in cochlear-implant subjects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 861–873.
57.Turner, C. W. , and Henn, C. C. (1989). “The relation between vowel recognition and measures of frequency resolution,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 32, 49–58.
58.Turner, C. W. , Chi, S.-L. , and Flock, S. (1999). “Limiting spectral resolution in speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 42, 773–784.
59.Turner, C. W. , Fabry, D. A. , Barrett, S. , and Horowitz, A. R. (1992). “Detection and recognition of stop consonants by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 35, 942–949.
60.Wilson, B. S. , Finley, C. C. , Lawson, D. T. , Wolford, R. D. , Eddington, D. K. , and Rabinowitz, W. M. (1991). “New levels of speech recognition with cochlear implants,” Nature (London) 352, 236–238.
61.Wilson, B. S. , Finley, C. C. , Lawson, D. , and Zerbi, M. (1998). “Temporal representations with cochlear implants,” Am. J. Otol. 18 (Suppl.) , S30–S34.
62.Zwolan, T. A. , Collins, L. M. , and Wakefield, G. H. (1997). “Electrode Discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 3673–3685.
63.Zwolan, T. A. , Kileny, P. R. , Ashbaugh, C. , and Telian, S. A. (1996). “Patient performance with the Cochlear Corporation implant: bipolar versus monopolar activation,” Am. J. Otol. 17, 717–723.
Article metrics loading...