Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Understanding speech in modulated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners
1.Bacon, S. P. , Opie, J. M. , and Montoya, D. Y. (1998). “The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 41, 549–563.
2.Dubno, J. , Horwitz, A. , and Ahlstrom, J. (2002). “Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 2897–2907.
3.Eisenberg, L. S. , Dirks, D. D. , and Bell, T. S. (1995). “Speech recognition in amplitude modulated noise of listeners with normal and impaired hearing,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 38, 222–233.
4.Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1990). “Effects of fluctuation noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1725–1736.
5.Fu, Q.-J. , Shannon, R. V. , and Wang, X. (1998). “Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 3586–3596.
6.Gustafsson, H. A. , and Arlinger, S. D. (1994). “Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 518–529.
7.Hedrick, M. S. , and Carney, A. E. (1997). “Effect of relative amplitude and formant transitions on perception of place of articulation by adult listeners with cochlear implants,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 40, 1445–1457.
8.Hedrick, M. S. , and Jesteadt, W. (1996). “Effect of relative amplitude, presentation level, and vowel duration on perception of voiceless stop consonants by normal and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 3398–3407.
9.IEEE (1969). “IEEE recommended practice for speech quality measurements,” IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 17(3), 225–246.
10.Kwon, B. J. (2002). Personal communication.
11.Kwon, B. J. , and Turner, C. W. (2001). “Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: Masking release or modulation interference?,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1130–1140.
12.Nelson, D. A. , and Donaldson, G. S. (2001). “Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 2921–2933.
13.Nittrouer, S. , and Boothroyd, A. (1990). “Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 2705–2715.
14.Shannon, R. , Zeng, F.-G. , Kamath, V. , Wygonski, J. , and Ekelid, M. (1995). “Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues,” Science 270, 303–304.
15.Takahashi, G. A. , and Bacon, S. P. (1992). “Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 35, 1410–1421.
16.Trine, T. D. (1995). “Speech recognition in modulated noise and temporal resolution: Effects of listening bandwidth,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
Article metrics loading...