Index of content:
Volume 113, Issue 6, June 2003
- PSYCHOLOGICAL ACOUSTICS 
113(2003); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1570443View Description Hide Description
When normal-hearing adults and children are required to detect a 1000-Hz tone in a random-frequency multitone masker, masking is often observed in excess of that predicted by traditional auditory filter models. The excess masking is called informational masking. Though individual differences in the effect are large, the amount of informational masking is typically much greater in young children than in adults [Oh et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 2888–2895 (2001)]. One factor that reduces informational masking in adults is spatial separation of the target tone and masker. The present study was undertaken to determine whether or not a similar effect of spatial separation is observed in children. An extreme case of spatial separation was used in which the target tone was presented to one ear and the random multitone masker to the other ear. This condition resulted in nearly complete elimination of masking in adults. In young children, however, presenting the masker to the nontarget ear typically produced only a slight decrease in overall masking and no change in informational masking. The results for children are interpreted in terms of a model that gives equal weight to the auditory filter outputs from each ear.
113(2003); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1570441View Description Hide Description
Perceptual weights in level discrimination (also called intensity discrimination) were determined for 3-, 7-, 15-, and 24-component tone complexes with flat spectral envelopes using a correlational paradigm. Each frequency component was randomly and independently perturbed in level on each presentation. For the target interval, frequency-component levels were additionally increased by the level increment to be detected, where p is pressure]. Weights were calculated from the across-trial correlation between the level perturbations for each frequency component and the interval chosen by the listener. Two conditions were investigated: (1) was equal across frequency components, and (2) increased progressively across frequency components. For both conditions, data for four listeners usually showed the greatest weight for the highest frequency component. The two-to-four highest frequency components generally were most important for level discrimination. The effect of increasing progressively with frequency was small and inconsistent. Additional measurements showed that flanking noise maskers designed to mask spread of excitation caused only small and generally unsystematic changes to the weights. Overall, these results indicate that listeners combine information across a wide range of auditory channels to arrive at a decision for level discrimination, but the weighting of channels appears to be suboptimal.
Pitch discrimination of diotic and dichotic tone complexes: Harmonic resolvability or harmonic number?113(2003); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1572146View Description Hide Description
Three experiments investigated the relationship between harmonic number, harmonic resolvability, and the perception of harmonic complexes. Complexes with successive equal-amplitude sine- or random-phase harmonic components of a 100- or 200-Hz fundamental frequency were presented dichotically, with even and odd components to opposite ears, or diotically, with all harmonics presented to both ears. Experiment 1 measured performance in discriminating a 3.5%–5% frequency difference between a component of a harmonic complex and a pure tone in isolation. Listeners achieved at least 75% correct for approximately the first 10 and 20 individual harmonics in the diotic and dichotic conditions, respectively, verifying that only processes before the binaural combination of information limit frequency selectivity. Experiment 2 measured fundamental frequency difference limens as a function of the average lowest harmonic number. Similar results at both provide further evidence that harmonic number, not absolute frequency, underlies the order-of-magnitude increase observed in when only harmonics above about the 10th are presented. Similar results under diotic and dichotic conditions indicate that the auditory system, in performing discrimination, is unable to utilize the additional peripherally resolved harmonics in the dichotic case. In experiment 3, dichotic complexes containing harmonics below the 12th, or only above the 15th, elicited pitches of the and twice the respectively. Together, experiments 2 and 3 suggest that harmonic number, regardless of peripheral resolvability, governs the transition between two different pitch percepts, one based on the frequencies of individual resolved harmonics and the other based on the periodicity of the temporal envelope.
Enhancing interaural-delay-based extents of laterality at high frequencies by using “transposed stimuli”113(2003); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1570431View Description Hide Description
An acoustic pointing task was used to determine whether interaural temporal disparities (ITDs) conveyed by high-frequency “transposed” stimuli would produce larger extents of laterality than ITDs conveyed by bands of high-frequency Gaussian noise. The envelopes of transposed stimuli are designed to provide high-frequency channels with information similar to that conveyed by the waveforms of low-frequency stimuli. Lateralization was measured for low-frequency Gaussian noises, the same noises transposed to 4 kHz, and high-frequency Gaussian bands of noise centered at 4 kHz. Extents of laterality obtained with the transposed stimuli were greater than those obtained with bands of Gaussian noise centered at 4 kHz and, in some cases, were equivalent to those obtained with low-frequency stimuli. In a second experiment, the general effects on lateral position produced by imposed combinations of bandwidth, ITD, and interaural phase disparities (IPDs) on low-frequency stimuli remained when those stimuli were transposed to 4 kHz. Overall, the data were fairly well accounted for by a model that computes the cross-correlation subsequent to known stages of peripheral auditory processing augmented by low-pass filtering of the envelopes within the high-frequency channels of each ear.
113(2003); http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1570445View Description Hide Description
Five different psychophysical procedures were used to measure level-discrimination (also called intensity discrimination) thresholds for 1-kHz tones at two levels (30 and 90 dB SPL) and two durations (10 and 500 ms). The procedures were the classic transformed up–down staircase method with a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) paradigm (UPD), 15- and 50-trial implementations of the method of maximum likelihood (MML) with a cued yes–no paradigm, and 18-trial implementations of ZEST using both cued yes–no and 2AFC paradigms. Results obtained from nine normal listeners show that estimates of level-discrimination thresholds for the four conditions are similar across all five procedures when different points of convergence are accounted for. The variance of threshold estimates within listener and condition was smallest for UPD, largest for the MML with 15 trials, and statistically indistinguishable among the others. The sweat factors ranged from 5.5 for MML with 50 trials to about 1.4 for UPD and ZEST. Simulations show that ideal performance of procedures may be far from real-life experience and that these deviations are likely to depend on complex interactions between listener behavior and parameter choices used for implementing the procedures. Therefore, empirical verification is important for judging the effectiveness of psychophysical procedures.