Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: Sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility
1.ANSI (1999). S3.6-1999, American National Standard Specification for Audiometers (American National Standards Institute, New York).
2.ANSI (1974). S3.19-1974, American National Standard Method for the Measurement of Real-ear Protection of Hearing Protectors and Physical Attenuation of Earmuffs (American National Standards Institute, New York).
3.ANSI (1997). S12.6-1997, American National Standard Method for Measuring Real-ear Attenuation of Hearing Protectors (American National Standards Institute, New York).
4.Berger, E. H. (1983). “Laboratory attenuation of earmuffs and earplugs both singly and in combination,” Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 44, 321–329.
5.Berger, E. H. , Franks, J. R. , Behar, A. , Casali, J. G. , Dixon-Ernst, C. , Kieper, R. W. , Merry, C. J. , Mozo, B. T. , Nixon, C. W. , Ohlin, D. , Royster, J. D. , and Royster, L. H. (1998). “Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of using subject-fit data,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 103, 665–672.
6.Berger, E. H. , Kieper, R. W. , and Gauger, D. (2003). “Hearing protection: Surpassing the limits to attenuation imposed by the bone-conduction pathways,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 1955–1967.
7.Casali, J. G. , and Park, M. Y. (1991). “Laboratory versus field attenuation of selected hearing protectors,” Sound Vib. 10, 28–38.
8.Franks, J. R. , Murphy, W. J. , Johnson, J. L. , and Harris, D. A. (2000). “Four earplugs in search of a rating system,” Ear Hear. 21, 218–226.
9.Franks, J. R. , Murphy, W. J. , Harris, D. A. , Johnson, J. L. , and Shaw, P. B. (2003). “Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance,” Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 64(4), 501–509.
10.Hamery, P., Dancer, A., and Evrard, G. (1997). Étude et réalisation de bouchons d’oreilles perforés non linéaires, ISL R128/97 (Insitut Franco-Allemand de Recherces de Saint-Louis, Saint–Louis).
11.ISO 5725-2 (1994). Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—Part 2: Basic method for the determination of repeatability and reproducibility of a standard measurement method (International Organization for Standardization, Geneva).
12.Murphy, W. J., and Franks, J. R. (1998). “Analysis of repeatability and reproducibility of hearing protector real-ear attenuation at threshold measured with three fitting methods,” Nat. Hear. Cons. Assoc., 19–21 February, Albuquerque, NM.
13.Murphy, W. J., and Franks, J. R. (2001). “A reevaluation of the Noise Reduction Rating,” Meeting of the Commissioned Officers Association of the US Public Health Service, 29 May, Washington, DC.
14.Murphy, W. J. , Franks, J. R. , and Krieg, E. F. (2002). “Hearing protector attenuation: Models of attenuation distributions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 2109–2116.
15.Netter, J., Wasserman, W., and Kutner, M. H. (1990). Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs, 3rd ed. (Irwin, Boston), pp. 970–1001.
16.NIOSH (1995). The NIOSH Compendium of Hearing Protection Devices, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Publication No. 95–105.
17.Rosner, B. (1990). Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 3rd ed. (Duxbury, Belmont).
18.Royster, J. D. , Berger, E. H. , Merry, C. J. , Nixon, C. W. , Franks, J. R. , Behar, A. , Casali, J. G. , Dixon-Ernst, C. , Kieper, R. W. , Mozo, B. T. , Ohlin, D. , and Royster, L. H. (1996). “Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part I. Research of Working Group 11, Accredited Standards Committee S12, Noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 1506–1526.
19.SAS/STAT Software (1998). Version 6.12 SAS Institute Inc.
20.S-Plus 6.1 for Windows (2002). Insightful Corporation, Seattle, WA.
21.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1978). CFR Title 40, subchapter G, 211, subpart B—Hearing Protective Devices, U.S. EPA.
Article metrics loading...