Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Intelligibility of bandpass filtered speech: Steepness of slopes required to eliminate transition band contributions
1.Bashford, Jr. J. A. , Riener, K. R. , and Warren, R. M. (1992). “Increasing the intelligibility of speech through multiple phonemic restorations,” Percept. Psychophys. 51, 211–217.
2.Bashford, Jr., J.A. Warren, R. M. , and Lenz, P. W. (2000). “Relative contributions of passband and filter skirts to intelligibility of bandpass speech: Some effects of amplitude and context,” ARLO 1, 31–36.
3.Bilger, R. C. , Nuetzel, J. M. , Rabinowitz, W. M. , and Rzeczkowski, C. (1984). “Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 27, 32–48.
4.Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Chicago).
5.Healy, E. H. (1998). “A minimum spectral contrast rule for speech recognition: Intelligibility based upon contrasting pairs of narrow-band amplitude patterns,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI.
6.Kalikow, D. N. , Stevens, K. N. , and Elliott, L. L. (1977). “Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 1337–1351.
7.Kryter, K. D. (1960). “Speech bandwidth compression through spectrum selection,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 32, 547–556.
8.Müsch, H. , and Buus, S. (2001). “Using statistical decision theory to predict speech intelligibility. I. Model structure,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 2896–2909.
9.Silverman, S. R. , and Hirsh, I. J. (1955). “Problems related to the use of speech in clinical audiometry,” Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 64, 1234–1245.
10.Steeneken, H. J. M. , and Houtgast, T. (2002). “Phoneme-group specific octave-band weights in predicting speech intelligibility,” Speech Commun. 38, 399–411.
11.Stickney, G. S. , and Assmann, P. F. (2001). “Acoustic and linguistic factors in the perception of bandpass-filtered speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 1157–1165.
12.Studebaker, G. A., and Sherbecoe, R. L. (1993). “Frequency-importance functions for speech recognition,” in Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, edited by G. A. Studebaker and I. Hochberg (Allyn and Bacon, Needham, MA), pp. 185–204.
13.Studebaker, G. A. , and Sherbecoe, R. L. (2002). “Intensity-importance functions for bandlimited monosyllabic words,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1422–1436.
14.Warren, R. M. , and Bashford, Jr. J. A. (1999). “Intelligibility of 1/3-octave speech: Greater contribution of frequencies outside than inside the nominal passband,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, L47–L52.
15.Warren, R. M. , Bashford, Jr. J. A. , and Lenz, P. W. (2000). “Intelligibility of bandpass speech: Effects of truncation or removal of transition bands,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1264–1268.
16.Warren, R. M. , Bashford, Jr. J. A. , and Lenz, P. W. (2003). “Intelligibility of dual rectangular speech bands: Implications of observations concerning amplitude mismatch and asynchrony,” Speech Commun. 40, 551–558.
17.Warren, R. M. , Riener, K. R. , Bashford, Jr. J. A. , and Brubaker, B. S. (1995). “Spectral redundancy: Intelligibility of sentences heard through narrow spectral slits,” Percept. Psychophys. 57, 175–182.
Article metrics loading...