Full text loading...
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Side effects of fast-acting dynamic range compression that affect intelligibility in a competing speech task
1.Agnew, J. , and Thornton, J. M. (2000). “Just noticeable and objectionable group delays in digital hearing aids,” J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 11, 330–336.
2.ANSI (1996). ANSI S3.22-1996. “Specification of hearing aid characteristics” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
3.ANSI (1997). ANSI S3.5-1997. “Methods for the calculation of the speech intelligibility index” (American National Standards Institute, New York).
4.Bacon, S. P. , and Gleitman, R. M. (1992). “Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 35, 642–653.
5.Baer, T. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1994). “Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2277–2280.
6.Baer, T. , Moore, B. C. J. , and Gatehouse, S. (1993). “Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: Effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 30, 49–72.
7.Bench, J., and Bamford, J. (1979). Speech-Hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-Impaired Children (Academic, London).
8.Braida, L. D., Durlach, N. I., De Gennaro, S. V., Peterson, P. M., and Bustamante, D. K. (1982). “Review of recent research on multiband amplitude compression for the hearing impaired,” in The Vanderbilt Hearing-Aid Report, edited by G. A. Studebaker and F. H. Bess (Monographs in Contemporary Audiology, Upper Darby, PA).
9.Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound (Bradford, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.).
10.Bregman, A. S. , Abramson, J. , Doehring, P. , and Darwin, C. J. (1985). “Spectral integration based on common amplitude modulation,” Percept. Psychophys. 37, 483–493.
11.Bustamante, D. K. , and Braida, L. D. (1987). “Multiband compression limiting for hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 24, 149–160.
12.Carrell, T. D. , and Opie, J. M. (1992). “The effect of amplitude comodulation on auditory object formation in sentence perception,” Percept. Psychophys. 52, 437–445.
13.Clark, G. M., Tong, Y. C., and Patrick, J. F. (1990). Cochlear Prostheses (Churchill Livingston, Edinburgh).
14.Darwin, C. J., and Carlyon, R. P. (1995). “Auditory grouping,” in Hearing, edited by B. C. J. Moore (Academic, San Diego).
15.Dillon, H. (1996). “Compression? Yes, but for low or high frequencies, for low or high intensities, and with what response times?” Ear Hear. 17, 287–307.
16.Drullman, R. , Festen, J. M. , and Houtgast, T. (1996). “Effect of temporal modulation reduction on spectral contrasts in speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 2358–2364.
17.Drullman, R. , Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1994a). “Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 2670–2680.
18.Drullman, R. , Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1994b). “Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1053–1064.
19.Eddington, D. K. (1983). “Speech recognition in deaf subjects with multichannel intracochlear electrodes,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 405, 241–258.
20.Elberling, C., and Hansen, K. V. (1999). “Hearing instruments—interaction with user preference,” in Auditory Models and Non-linear Hearing Instruments, edited by A. N. Rasmussen, P. A. Osterhammel, T. Andersen, and T. Poulsen (Holmens Trykkeri, Copenhagen, Denmark).
21.Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1990). “Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1725–1736.
22.Friesen, L. M. , Shannon, R. V. , Baskent, D. , and Wang, X. (2001). “Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 1150–1163.
23.Glasberg, B. R. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1986). “Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 1020–1033.
24.Hafter, E. R. , Bonnel, A. M. , and Gallun, E. J. (1996). “Detection of change without regard to its valence,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 2541.
25.Hall, J. W. , and Grose, J. H. (1990). “Comodulation masking release and auditory grouping,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 119–125.
26.Hall, J. W. , and Grose, J. H. (1991). “Some effects of auditory grouping factors on modulation detection interference (MDI),” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90, 3028–3035.
27.Hall, J. W., Grose, J. H., and Mendoza, L. (1995). “Across-channel processes in masking,” in Hearing, edited by B. C. J. Moore (Academic, San Diego).
28.IEEE (1968). Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York).
29.MacLeod, A. , and Summerfield, Q. (1990). “A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: Rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use,” Br. J. Audiol. 24, 29–43.
30.Macmillan, N. A. (1973). “Detection and recognition of intensity changes in tone and noise: The detection-recognition disparity,” Percept. Psychophys. 13, 65–75.
31.Moore, B. C. J. (1990). “How much do we gain by gain control in hearing aids?” Acta Oto-Laryngol., Suppl. 469, 250–256.
32.Moore, B. C. J. (1992). “Across-channel processes in auditory masking,” J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn. (E) 13, 25–37.
33.Moore, B. C. J. (1998). Cochlear Hearing Loss (Whurr, London).
34.Moore, B. C. J. (2003a). “Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants,” Otol. Neurotol. 24, 243–254.
35.Moore, B. C. J. (2003b). “Speech processing for the hearing-impaired: Successes, failures, and implications for speech mechanisms,” Speech Commun. 41, 81–91.
36.Moore, B. C. J. , and Moore, G. A. (2003). “Discrimination of the fundamental frequency of complex tones with fixed and shifting spectral envelopes by normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects,” Hear. Res. 182, 153–163.
37.Moore, B. C. J. , Peters, R. W. , and Stone, M. A. (1999). “Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 400–411.
38.Moore, B. C. J. , and Shailer, M. J. (1992). “Modulation discrimination interference and auditory grouping,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 336, 339–346.
39.Moore, B. C. J. , Shailer, M. J. , and Black, M. J. (1993). “Dichotic interference effects in gap detection,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2130–2133.
40.Moore, B. C. J. , Shailer, M. J. , and Schooneveldt, G. P. (1992). “Temporal modulation transfer functions for bandlimited noise in subjects with cochlear hearing loss,” Br. J. Audiol. 26, 229–237.
41.Pick, G., Evans, E. F., and Wilson, J. P. (1977). “Frequency resolution in patients with hearing loss of cochlear origin,” in Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, edited by E. F. Evans and J. P. Wilson (Academic, London).
42.Plomp, R. (1983). “The role of modulation in hearing,” in Hearing—Physiological Bases and Psychophysics, edited by R. Klinke and R. Hartmann (Springer, Berlin).
43.Plomp, R. (1988). “The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 2322–2327.
44.Plomp, R. (1994). “Noise, amplification, and compression: Considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design,” Ear Hear. 15, 2–12.
45.Qin, M. K. , and Oxenham, A. J. (2003). “Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 446–454.
46.Rasch, R. A. (1978). “The perception of simultaneous notes such as in polyphonic music,” Acustica 40, 21–33.
47.Robinson, C. E. , and Huntington, D. A. (1973). “The intelligibility of speech processed by delayed long-term averaged compression amplification,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 314.
48.Rosen, S., and Fourcin, A. (1986). “Frequency selectivity and the perception of speech,” in Frequency Selectivity in Hearing, edited by B. C. J. Moore (Academic, London).
49.Shannon, R. V. , Zeng, F.-G. , Kamath, V. , Wygonski, J. , and Ekelid, M. (1995). “Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues,” Science 270, 303–304.
50.Stone, M. A. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1992). “Syllabic compression: Effective compression ratios for signals modulated at different rates,” Br. J. Audiol. 26, 351–361.
51.Stone, M. A. , and Moore, B. C. J. (2002). “Tolerable hearing-aid delays. II. Estimation of limits imposed during speech production,” Ear Hear. 23, 325–338.
52.Stone, M. A. , and Moore, B. C. J. (2003a). “Effect of the speed of a single-channel dynamic range compressor on intelligibility in a competing speech task,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 1023–1034.
53.Stone, M. A. , and Moore, B. C. J. (2003b). “Tolerable hearing-aid delays. III. Effects on speech production and perception of across-frequency variation in delay,” Ear Hear. 24, 175–183.
54.Stone, M. A. , Moore, B. C. J. , Alcántara, J. I. , and Glasberg, B. R. (1999). “Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 3603–3619.
55.Studebaker, G. (1985). “A rationalized arcsine transform,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 28, 455–462.
56.Summerfield, Q. , and Culling, J. F. (1992). “Auditory segregation of competing voices: Absence of effects of FM or AM coherence,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 336, 357–366.
57.Turner, C. W. , Souza, P. E. , and Forget, L. N. (1995). “Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 2568–2576.
58.Verschuure, J. , Maas, A. J. J. , Stikvoort, E. , de Jong, R. M. , Goedegebure, A. , and Dreschler, W. A. (1996). “Compression and its effect on the speech signal,” Ear Hear. 17, 162–175.
59.Villchur, E. (1973). “Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 53, 1646–1657.
60.Zeng, F.-G. (2004). “Compression and cochlear implants,” in Compression: From Cochlea to Cochlear Implants, edited by S. P. Bacon, A. N. Popper, and R. R. Fay (Springer, New York).
Article metrics loading...