No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Effects of cochlear hearing loss on perceptual grouping cues in competing-vowel perception
1.ANSI (1989). ANSI S3.6-1989, “Specifications for audiometers,” (ANSI, New York).
2.Arehart, K. H. (1994). “Effects of harmonic content on complex-tone fundamental-frequency discrimination in hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3574–3585.
3.Arehart, K. H. (1998). “Effects of high-frequency amplification on double-vowel identification in listeners with hearing loss,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 1733–1736.
4.Arehart, K. H. , King, C. A. , and McLean-Mudgett, K. S. (1997). “Role of fundamental frequency differences in the perceptual separation of completing vowel sounds by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 40, 1434–1444.
5.Arehart, K. H. , Rossi-Katz, J. A. , and Swensson-Prutsman, J. (2005). “Double-vowel perception in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: Differences in fundamental frequency, ear of presentation and relative amplitude,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 48, 236–252.
6.Assmann, P. F. , and Summerfield, Q. (1990). “Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: Vowels with different fundamental frequencies,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 680–697.
7.Assmann, P. F. , and Summerfield, Q. (1994). “The contribution of waveform interactions to the perception of concurrent vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 471–484.
8.Bird, J. , and Darwin, C. J. (1998). “Effects of a difference in fundamental frequency in separating two sentences,” in Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing, edited by A. R. Palmer, A. Rees, A. Q. Summerfield, and R. Meddis (Whurr, London, UK), pp. 263–269.
9.Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound (Brandford Books, MIT, Cambridge, MA).
10.Broadbent, D. E. , and Ladefoged, P. (1957). “On the fusion of sounds reaching different sense organs,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29, 708–710.
11.Brokx, J. P. L. , and Nootebom, S. G. (1982). “Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices,” J. Phonetics 10, 23–36.
12.Byrne, D. , and Dillon, H. (1986). “The National Acoustic Laboratories’ (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid,” Ear Hear. 7, 257–265.
13.Carlyon, R. P. , Demany, L. , and Semal, C. (1992). “Detection of across-frequency differences in fundamental frequency,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 279–292.
14.Culling, J. F. , and Darwin, C. J. (1993). “Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: Within and across-formant grouping by F0,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 3454–3467.
15.Culling, J. F. , and Darwin, C. J. (1994). “Perceptual and computational separation of simultaneous vowels: Cues arising from low-frequency beating,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 1559–1569.
16.Darwin, C. J. , and Carlyon, R. P. (1995). “Auditory Grouping,” in Hearing: Handbook of Perception and Cognition, 2nd ed., edited by B. C. J. Moore (Academic, London), pp. 387–424.
18.Dreschler, W. A. , and Plomp, R. (1980). “Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. I.,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68, 1608–1615.
19.Dreschler, W. A. , and Plomp, R. (1985). “Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II.,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 1261–1270.
20.Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1990). “Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 1725–1736.
21.Glasberg, B. R. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1989). “Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech,” Scand. Audiol. Suppl. 32, 1–25.
22.Houtsma, A. J. M. , and Smurzynski, J. (1990). “Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 304–310.
24.Meddis, R. , and Hewitt, M. J. (1992). “Modeling the identification of concurrent vowels with different fundamental frequencies,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 233–245.
25.Moore, B. C. J. (1995). Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Hearing Loss (Oxford U.P., Oxford).
26.Moore, B. C. J. , and Peters, R. W. (1992). “Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2881–2893.
28.Scheffers, M. T. M. (1983). “Sifting vowels: Auditory pitch analysis and sound segregation,” Ph.D. thesis, Groningen.
29.Stubbs, R. J. , and Summerfield, Q. (1988). “Evaluation of two voice-separation algorithms using normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 1236–1249.
30.Studebaker, G. A. (1985). “A ‘rationalized’ arcsin transform,” J. Speech Hear. Res. 28, 455–462.
31.Summers, V. , and Leek, M. R. (1998). “F0 processing and the separation of competing speech signals by listeners with normal hearing and with hearing loss,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 41, 1294–1306.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month