(Color online) Local bathymetry from the precision depth recorder, upper path and lower path eigenrays traced using the mean sound speed profile, and potential density contours taken with an autonomous vehicle, SPURV, depth cycling over the lower ray. The grayscale are equally spaced, with a total range of .
(Color online) Spectra of the moored displacement and travel time measured during MATE (normalized to integral one). The fit of the model to the moored spectrum and its prediction for the travel time spectrum are shown.
Intensity for the four frequencies of MATE taken during the last 66 hours of the experiment with equal time records of the lower path and upper path results.
Intensity spectra for the four frequencies of MATE with the moment theory predictions of Macaskill and Ewart (1996) superimposed. The inertial frequency is , and the buoyancy frequency is .
Expansion parameter, , according to the literature for 2, 4, and computed using the MATE lower path oceanographic data. Since these values are above 1, the Markov approximation is called into question.
A diagrammatic representation of Eq. (29) . The horizontal represents range, while the vertical does not have a similar meaning. The solid line represents the factor for propagation of the acoustic field, for mode . The dots indicate interaction factors , and the dashed line represents that these interactions are to be correlated. Not indicated is the integration over the range variable with , nor is the factor in front of the , integral, that relates the unscattered field at to that at , indicated. In Eq. (29) , the correlation function is expressed in terms of the spectrum.
The three ways of pairing four interactions. The fourth moment of the internal wave field can be expressed in terms of correlated pairs because of the assumption that it comprises a zero mean Gaussian process. These diagrams can be interpreted as parts of the contribution from the medium fourth moment, using the same interpretation as in Fig. 6 . Integrations over , , are understood with .
A diagrammatic representation of how the three contributions of Fig. 7 occur in the solution, Eq. (39) , of Eq. (18) with Eq. (29) (Fig. 6 ) for . No interactions occur between a correlated pair. The correction to Eq. (29) is the difference between Figs. 7 and Fig. 8 . The contribution is correctly given, whereas and are different in Figs. 7 and 8 . The diagonal lines represent “backward” propagation. For example, in Fig. 8(b) the factor is . van Kampen gives a purely algebraic method of constructing the correction, so the diagrams should be taken as only interpretational, not as necessary for obtaining the expressions.
Estimate of the modified expansion parameter computed from the MATE oceanographic data for the lower path. These values are below 1, so the Markov approximation is valid. The vanishing at the center of the path is not to be understood as the Markov approximation being better there. Rather, the fourth order happens to have a factor multiplying the expansion parameter that is small there.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...