No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Nonoptimal propagation of advertisement calls of midwife toads in Iberian habitats
1.Bee, M. A. , and Perril, S. A. (1996). “Responses to conspecific advertisement calls in the green frog (Rana clamitans) and their role in male–male communication,” Behaviour0005-7959 133, 283–301.
2.Boatright-Horowitz, S. S. , Cheney, C. A. , and Megela Simmons, A. (1999). “Atmospheric and underwater propagation of bullfrog vocalizations,” Bioacoustics 9, 257–280.
3.Böll, S. , and Linsenmair, K. E. (1998). “Size-dependent mating success and size assortative mating in the midwife toad Alytes obstetricans,” Amphibia-Reptilia 19, 75–90.
4.Bosch, J. , and de la Riva, I. (2004). “Are frog calls modulated by the environment? An analysis with anuran species from Bolivia,” Can. J. Zool.0008-4301 82, 880–888.
5.Bosch, J. , and Márquez, R. (1996). “Acoustic competition in male midwife toads Alytes obstetricans and Alytes cistenasii: Response to neighbor size and calling rate. Implications for mate choice,” Ethology0179-1613 102, 841–855.
6.Bosch, J. , and Márquez, R. (2001). “Call timing in male-male acoustical interactions and female choice in the midwife toad Alytes obstetricans,” Copeia0045-8511 2001, 169–177.
7.Bosch, J. , and Wilczynski, W. (2003). “Auditory tuning of the Iberian midwife toad, Alytes cisternasii,” Herp. J. 13, 53–57.
8.Brown, L. E. , and Crespo, E. G. (2000). “Burrowing behavior of the midwife toads Alytes cisternasii, and A. obstetricans (Anura, Discoglossidae),” Alytes (ISSCA) 17, 101–113.
9.Crespo, E. G. (1982). “Contribuição para o conhecimento da biología das espécies Ibéricas de Alytes, Alytes obstetricans Boscai (Lataste 1879) e Alytes cisternasii (Boscá 1879) (Amphibia Discoglossidae). Ovos, posturas (Epocas de reprodução),” Arquivos do Museo Bocage. Serie A 1, 453–466.
10.Crespo, E. G. , Oliveira, M. E. , Rosa, H. C. , and Paillette, M. (1989). “Mating calls of the Iberian midwife toads Alytes obstetricans Boscai and Alytes cisternasii,” Bioacoustics 2, 1–9.
11.Gerhardt, H. C. (1975). “Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads,” J. Comp. Physiol. [A]0340-7594 102, 1–12.
12.Gerhardt, H. C. , and Huber, F. (2002). Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
13.Gish, S. L. , and Morton, E. S. (1981). “Structural adaptations to local habitat acoustics in Carolina wren songs,” Z. Tierpsychol.0044-3573 56, 74–84.
15.Kime, N. M. , Turner, W. R. , and Ryan, M. J. (2000). “The transmission of advertisement calls in Central American frogs,” Behav. Ecol. 11, 71–83.
16.Loftus-Hills, J. J. , and Littlejohn, M. J. (1971). “Mating call sound intensities of anuran amphibians,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 49, 1327–1329.
17.López, P. T. , Narins, P. M. , Lewis, E. R. , and Moore, S. W. (1988). “Acousticallly induced modification in the white-lipped frog Leptodactylus albilabris,” Anim. Behav.0003-3472 36, 1295–1308.
18.Márquez, R. (1992). “Terrestrial paternal care and short breeding seasons: Reproductive phenology of the midwife toads Alytes obstetricans, and A. cisternasii,” Ecography0906-7590 15, 279–288.
19.Márquez, R. (1995a). “Female choice in the midwife toads (Alytes obstetricans and A. cisternasii),” Behaviour0005-7959 132, 151–161.
20.Márquez, R. (1995b). “Preferencia de las hembras por cantos de frecuencia dominante baja en el sapo partero común Alytes obstetricans (Anura, Discoglossidae). Experimentos in situ,” Rev. Española Herpetol. 9, 77–83.
21.Márquez, R. , and Bosch, J. (1995). “Advertisement calls of the midwife toads Alytes (Amphibia, Anura, Discoglossidae) in continental Spain,” J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 33, 185–192.
22.Márquez, R. , and Bosch, J. (1997a). “Female preference in complex acoustical environments in the midwife toads Alytes obstetricans and Alytes cisternasii,” Behav. Ecol. 8, 588–594.
23.Márquez, R. , and Bosch, J. (1997b). “Male advertisement call and female preference in sympatric and allopatric midwife toads (Alytes obstetricans and Alytes cisternasii),” Anim. Behav.0003-3472 54, 1333–1345.
24.Márquez, R. , and Crespo, E. G. (2002). “Alytes cisternasii,” in Atlas y Libro Rojo de los Anfibios y Reptiles de España, edited by J. M. Pleguezuelos, R. Márquez, and M. Lizana (Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente-Asociación Herpetológica Española, Madrid), pp. 73–75.
25.Mohneke, R. , and Schneider, H. (1979). “Effect of temperature upon auditory thresholds in two anuran species, Bombina v. variegata and Alytes o. obstetricans (Amphibia: Discoglossidae),” J. Comp. Physiol. [A]0340-7594 130, 9–16.
27.Passmore, N. I. (1981). “Sound levels of mating calls of some African frogs,” Herpetologica 37, 166–171.
28.Penna, M. , and Solís, R. (1998). “Frog call intensities and sound propagation in the South American temperate forest region,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.0340-5443 42, 371–381.
29.Piercy, J. E. , and Daigle, G. A. (1991). “Sound propagation in the open air,” in Handbook of Acoustical Measurements and Noise Control, edited by C. M. Harris (McGraw-Hill, New York), pp. 3–13–26.
30.Reading, C. J. , and Clarke, R. T. (1988). “Multiple clutches, egg mortality and mate choice in the mid-wife toad, Alytes obstetricans,” Amphibia-Reptilia 9, 357–364.
31.Rodríguez-Jiménez, A. J. (1984). “Fenología del sapo partero ibérico (Alytes cisternasii Boscá. 1879),” Alytes (España) 2, 9–23.
32.Ryan, M. J. , and Brenowitz, E. A. (1985). “The role of body size, phylogeny and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song,” Am. Nat.0003-0147 126, 87–100.
33.Ryan, M. J. , Cocroft, R. B. , and Wilczynski, W. (1990). “The role of environmental selection in intraspecific divergence of mate recognition signals in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans,” Evolution (Lawrence, Kans.)0014-3820 44, 1869–1872.
34.Shy, E. (1983). “The relation of geographical variation in song to habitat characteristics and body size in North American tanagers (Thraupinae: Piranga),” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.0340-5443 12, 71–76.
35.Slabbekoorn, H. , and Smith, T. B. (2002). “Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbull: An analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals,” Evolution (Lawrence, Kans.)0014-3820 36, 1849–1858.
36.Sorjonen, J. (1986). “Song structure and singing strategies in the genus Luscinia in different habitats and geographical areas,” Behaviour0005-7959 98, 274–285.
37.Van Staaden, M. J. , and Römer, H. (1997). “Sexual signalling in bladder grasshoppers: Tactical design for maximizing call range,” J. Exp. Biol.0022-0949 200, 2597–2608.
38.Venator, K. (1999). “The influence of signal attenuation and degradation on behavior and midbrain auditory thresholds in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans Blanchardi,” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
39.Wagner, W. E. , Jr. (1989). “Fighting, assessment, and frequency alteration in Blanchard’s cricket frog,” Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.0340-5443 25, 429–436.
40.Zimmerman, B. L. (1983). “A comparison of structural features of calls of open and forest habitat in the central Amazon,” Herpetologica 39, 235–246.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month