No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
1.ANSI (1997). ANSI S3.5-1997, “American national standard methods for the calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index,” American National Standards Institute, New York.
2.Apoux, F. , and Bacon, S. P. (2004). “Relative importance of temporal information in various frequency regions for consonant identification in quiet and in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 116, 1671–1680.
3.Bacon, S. P. , Opie, J. M. , and Montoya, D. Y. (1998). “The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.1092-4388 41, 549–563.
4.Baer, T. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1993). “Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 94, 1229–1241.
5.Baer, T. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1994). “Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 95, 2277–2280.
6.Bronkhorst, A. W. , and Plomp, R. (1992). “Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 92, 3132–3139.
7.Celmer, R. D. , and Bienvenue, G. R. (1987). “Critical bands in the perception of speech signals by normal and sensorineural hearing loss listeners,” in The Psychophysics of Speech Perception, edited by M. E. H. Schouten (Nijhoff, Dordrecht).
8.Dubno, J. R. , Horwitz, A. R. , and Ahlstrom, J. B. (2003). “Recovery from prior stimulation: Masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal-hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 113, 2084–2094.
9.Dubno, J. R. , Horwitz, A. R. , and Ahlstrom, J. B. (2002). “Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 111, 2897–2907.
10.Dubno, J. R. , and Schaefer, A. B. (1992). “Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 91, 2110–2121.
11.Duifhuis, H. (1973). “Consequences of peripheral frequency selectivity for nonsimultaneous masking,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 54, 1471–1488.
12.Eisenberg, L. S. , Dirks, D. D. , and Bell, T. S. (1995). “Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing,” J. Speech Hear. Res.0022-4685 38, 222–233.
13.Fabry, D. A. , and Van Tasell, D. J. (1986). “Masked and filtered simulation of hearing loss: Effects on consonant recognition,” J. Speech Hear. Res.0022-4685 29, 170–178.
14.Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1981). “Relations between auditory functions in normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 70, 356–369.
15.Festen, J. M. (1993). “Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 94, 1295–1300.
16.Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1990). “Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal-hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 88, 1725–1736.
17.Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1983). “Temporal gap detection in noise as a function of frequency, bandwidth, and level,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 74, 67–72.
18.Fitzgibbons, P. J. , and Gordon-Salant, S. (1987). “Temporal gap resolution in listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 81, 133–137.
20.Florentine, M. , and Buus, S. (1984). “Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments,” J. Speech Hear. Res.0022-4685 27, 449–455.
21.Füllgrabe, C. , Berthommier, F. , and Lorenzi, C. (2006). “Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise,” Hear. Res.0378-5955 211, 74–84.
22.French, N. R. , and Steinberg, J. C. (1947). “Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 19, 90–119.
23.Gatehouse, S. , Naylor, G. , and Elberling, C. (2003). “Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment,” Int. J. Audiol. 42, S77–85.
24.Gifford, R. H. , and Bacon, S. P. (2005). “Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 118, 3823–3833.
26.Glasberg, B. R. , Moore, B. C. J. , and Bacon, S. P. (1987). “Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 81, 1546–1556.
27.Gordon-Salant, S. , and Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1997). “Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.1092-4388 40, 423–431.
28.Gordon-Salant, S. , and Fitzgibbons, P. J. (2004). “Effects of stimulus and noise rate variability on speech perception by younger and older adults,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 115, 1808–1817.
29.Grose, J. H. , Hall, J. W. , and Buss, E. (2001). “Gap duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: Effects of gap and masker duration, frequency separation, and mode of presentation,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.1525-3961 2, 388–398.
30.Gustafsson, H. A. , and Arlinger, S. D. (1993). “Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 95, 518–529.
31.Hall, J. W. , Davis, A. C. , Haggard, M. P. , and Pillsbury, H. C. (1988). “Spectro-temporal analysis in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 84, 1325–1331.
32.Hall, J. W. , Haggard, M. P. , and Fernandes, M. A. (1984). “Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 76, 50–56.
33.Hawkins, J. E. , and Stevens, S. S. (1950). “The masking of pure tones and of speech by white noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 22, 6–13.
35.Hilkhuysen, G. L. M. , Houtgast, T. , and Lyzenga, J. (2005). “Estimating cochlear-filter shapes, temporal-window width and compression from tone-sweep detection in spectral and temporal noise gaps,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 117, 2598–2599.
36.Hogan, C. A. , and Turner, C. W. (1998). “High-frequency audibility: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 104, 432–441.
37.Howard-Jones, P. A. , and Rosen, S. (1993). “Uncomodulated glimpsing in “checkerboard” noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 93, 2915–2922.
38.Humes, L. E. , Dirks, D. D. , Bell, T. S. , and Kincaid, G. E. (1987). “Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 81, 765–773.
39.Humes, L. E. , Espinoza-Varas, B. , and Watson, C. S. (1988). “Modeling sensorineural hearing loss. I. Model and retrospective evaluation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 83, 188–202.
40.Hygge, S. , Ronnberg, J. , Larsby, B. , and Arlinger, S. (1992). “Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects’ ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds,” J. Speech Hear. Res.0022-4685 35, 208–215.
41.International Organization for Standardization (1991). ISO 389:1991(E), “Acoustics–Standard reference zero for the calibration of pure-tone air conduction audiometers,” (available from the American National Standards Institute, New York).
42.Jesteadt, W. , Bacon, S. P. , and Lehman, J. R. (1982). “Forward masking as a function of frequency, masker level, and signal delay,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 71, 950–962.
44.Las, L. , Stern, E. A. , and Nelken, I. (2005). “Representation of tone in fluctuating maskers in the ascending auditory system,” J. Neurosci.0270-6474 25, 1503–1513.
46.Lochner, J. P. A. , and Burger, J. F. (1961). “Form of the loudness function in the presence of masking noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 33, 1705–1707.
47.Ludvigsen, C. (1985). “Relations among some psychoacoustic parameters in normal and cochlearly impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 78, 1271–1280.
48.Moore, B. C. J. , Peters, R. W. , and Glasberg, B. R. (1993). “Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids: Effects of frequency and level,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 93, 1563–1570.
49.Moore, B. C. J. , Vickers, D. A. , Plack, C. J. , and Oxenham, A. J. (1999). “Inter-relationship between different psycho-acoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 106, 2761–2778.
50.Nelson, P. B. , Jin, S. H. , Carney, A. E. , and Nelson, D. A. (2003). “Understanding speech in modulated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 113, 962–968.
51.Nelson, P. B. , and Jin, S. H. (2004). “Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 115, 2286–2294.
52.Noordhoek, I. M. , Houtgast, T. , and Festen, J. M. (1999). “Measuring the threshold for speech reception by adaptive variation of the signal bandwidth. I. Normal-hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 105, 2895–2902.
53.Noordhoek, I. M. , Houtgast, T. , and Festen, J. M. (2000). “Measuring the threshold for speech reception by adaptive variation of the signal bandwidth. II. Hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 107, 1685–1696.
54.Oxenham, A. J. , and Bacon, S. P. (2003). “Cochlear compression: Perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearing,” Ear Hear.0196-0202 24, 352–366.
55.Patterson, R. D. , Nimmo-Smith, I. , Weber, D. L. , and Milroy, R. (1982). “The deterioration of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 72, 1788–1803.
56.Pavlovic, C. V. (1987). “Derivation of primary parameters and procedures for use in speech intelligibility predictions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 82, 413–422.
57.Peters, R. W. , Moore, B. C. J. , and Baer, T. (1998). “Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 103, 577–587.
58.Pichora-Fuller, M. K. , Schneider, B. A. , and Daneman, M. (1995). “How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 97, 593–608.
59.Plomp, R. (1978). “Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 63, 533–549.
60.Plomp, R. , and Mimpen, A. M. (1979). “Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences,” Audiology0020-6091 18, 43–52.
61.Rhebergen, K. S. , and Versfeld, N. J. (2005). “A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 117, 2181–2192.
63.Snell, K. B. , Mapes, F. M. , Hickman, E. D. , and Frisina, D. R. (2002). “Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 112, 720–727.
64.Sommers, M. S. , and Humes, L. E. (1993a). “Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal and elderly listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 93, 2903–2914.
65.Sommers, M. S. , and Humes, L. E. (1993b). “Erratum: Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal and elderly listeners [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2903–2914 (1993)],” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 94, 2449–2450.
66.Stevens, S. S. (1966). “Power-group transformations under glare, masking and recruitment,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 39, 725–735.
67.Stuart, A. , and Phillips, D. P. (1996). “Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing and presbyacusic listeners,” Ear Hear.0196-0202 17, 478–489.
68.Summers, V. , and Molis, M. R. (2004). “Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: Effects of hearing loss and presentation level,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.1092-4388 47, 245–256.
69.Takahashi, G. A. , and Bacon, S. P. (1992). “Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly,” J. Speech Hear. Res.0022-4685 35, 1410–1421.
70.ter Keurs, M. , Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1993a). “Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 93, 1547–1552.
71.ter Keurs, M. , Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1993b). “Limited resolution of spectral contrast and hearing loss for speech in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 94, 1307–1314.
72.Turner, C. W. , and Brus, S. L. (2001). “Providing low- and mid-frequency speech information to listeners with sensorineural hearing loss,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 109, 2999–3006.
73.Versfeld, N. J. , Daalder, L. , Festen, J. M. , and Houtgast, T. (2000). “Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of speech reception threshold,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 107, 1671–1684.
74.Versfeld, N. J. , and Dreschler, W. A. (2002). “The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 111, 401–408.
75.Wagener, K. C. , and Brand, T. (2005). “Sentence intelligibility in noise for listeners with normal hearing and hearing impairment: Influence of measurement procedure and masking parameters,” Int. J. Audiol. 44, 144–156.
76.Warren, R. M. (1970). “Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds,” Science0036-8075 167, 392–393.
77.Watson, C. S. , Qiu, W. W. , Chamberlain, M. M. , and Li, X. (1996). “Auditory and visual speech perception: Confirmation of a modality-independent source of individual differences in speech recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 100, 1153–1162.
78.Xu, L. , Thompson, C. S. , and Pfingst, B. E. (2005). “Relative contributions of spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 117, 3255–3267.
79.Zurek, P. M. , and Delhorne, L. A. (1987). “Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 82, 1548–1559.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month