1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Two-dimensional ultrasound detection with unfocused frequency-randomized signals
Rent:
Rent this article for
USD
10.1121/1.2400847
/content/asa/journal/jasa/121/1/10.1121/1.2400847
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/121/1/10.1121/1.2400847
View: Figures

Figures

Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

(a) A pressure field is generated by driving each of transducer elements with a unique frequency within the bandwidth of the transducer, creating a complicated broadband field pattern. (b) This field is assumed to encounter variation in density and sound speed within a region of interest (ROI) causing weak scattering, (first-order Born approximation). (c) Each point in the ROI is tested using the inverse of the kernel for the location. The rest of the signal will present itself as noise . (d) If this process is repeated with a new randomization, the “noise” averages toward zero, while the signal gets stronger.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Slice from a three-dimensional k-space simulation of a focused, pulsed wave traveling through a medium with scatterers smaller than the imaging wavelengths. Scattering from two objects is present in the image.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Simulated B-scan images resulting from scattering from two wires separated by (a) , (b) , (c) , and (d) .

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

(a) Comparison of the random frequency method (top) with a traditional B-scan (bottom) using the same frequency bandwidth. (b) A more magnified view compared with the actual position of the scatterers.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(a) An image of two scatterers separated in the direction parallel to the transducer face at the resolution limit of over the entire ROI and (b) a magnified view compared with the actual position of the scatterers.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

(a) An image of two scatterers separated in the axial direction at the resolution limit of over the entire ROI and (b) a magnified view compared with the actual position of the scatterers indicates the distortion observed at small separations.

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

(a) Two reconstructed objects in the ROI with scattering strengths and . The speed of sound of is varied and the ratio of the measured scattering ratio of the two coefficients is plotted as a function of frequency (squares). The reconstructed values are compared with the actual (circles).

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

A series of simulations with multiple scatterers (right column) and their reconstruction (left column) demonstrating application at distances of (a) 3–, (b) 10–, and (c) 26– in front of the transducer.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/121/1/10.1121/1.2400847
2007-01-01
2014-04-17
Loading

Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Two-dimensional ultrasound detection with unfocused frequency-randomized signals
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/121/1/10.1121/1.2400847
10.1121/1.2400847
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM