No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Why do transposed stimuli enhance binaural processing?: Interaural envelope correlation vs envelope normalized fourth moment
1.Bernstein, L. R. , and Trahiotis, C. (1994). “Detection of interaural delay in high-frequency SAM tones, two-tone complexes, and bands of noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 95, 3561–3567.
2.Bernstein, L. R. , and Trahiotis, C. (2002). “Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using transposed stimuli,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 112, 1026–1036.
3.Bernstein, L. R. , and Trahiotis, C. (2003). “Enhancing interaural-delay-based extents of laterality at high frequencies by using ‘transposed stimuli,’” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 113, 3335–3347.
4.Bernstein, L. R. , and Trahiotis, C. (2004). “The apparent immunity of high-frequency transposed stimuli to low-frequency binaural interference,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 116, 3062–3069.
5.Bernstein, L. R. , and Trahiotis, C. (2005). “Measures of extents of laterality for high-frequency ‘transposed’ stimuli under conditions of binaural interference,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 118, 1626–1635.
6.Bernstein, L. R. , Par, Steven van de , and Trahiotis, C. (1999). “The normalized correlation: Accounting for thresholds obtained with Gaussian and “low-noise” masking noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 106, 870–876.
7.Dye, R. H. , Jr., Niemiec, A. J. , and Stellmack, M. A. (1994). “Discrimination of interaural envelope delays: The effect of randomizing component starting phase,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 95, 463–470.
8.Hartmann, W. M. (1987). “Temporal fluctuations and the discrimination of spectrally dense signals by human listeners,” in Auditory Processing of Complex Sound, edited by W. A. Yose and C. S. Watson (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ).
9.Hartmann, W. M. and Pumplin, J. (1988). “Noise power fluctuations and the masking of sine signals,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 83, 2277–2289.
10.Henning, G. B. , and Ashton, J. (1981). “The effect of carrier and modulation frequency on lateralization based on interaural phase and interaural group delay,” Hear. Res.0378-5955 4, 186–194.
12.Nuetzel, J. M. , and Hafter, E. R. (1976). “Lateralization of complex waveforms: Effects of fine-structure, amplitude, and duration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 60, 1339–1346.
13.Nuetzel, J. M. , and Hafter, E. R. (1981). “Discrimination of interaural delays in complex waveforms: Spectral effects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 69, 1112–1118.
14.Par, S. van de and Kohlrausch, A. (1997). “A new approach to comparing binaural masking level differences at low and high frequencies,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-49660001-4966 101, 1671–1680.
Article metrics loading...
High-frequency, “transposed” stimuli have been shown to yield enhanced processing of ongoing interaural temporal disparities (ITDs). This paper concerns determining which aspect or aspects of the envelopes of such stimuli mediate enhanced resolution of ITD. Behavioral measures and quantitative analyses utilizing special classes of transposed stimuli show that the “internal” interaural envelope correlation accounts both qualitatively and quantitatively for the enhancement. In contrast, the normalized fourth moment of the envelope , which provides an index of the degree to which the envelopes of high-frequency stimuli fluctuate, does not lead to a successful accounting of the data.
Full text loading...
Most read this month