banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
An annular superposition integral for axisymmetric radiators
Rent this article for
View: Figures


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Coordinate axis used in the derivation. A piston of radius is excited by a radially varying particle velocity specified by an aperture function , where is the radial position on the piston. The radiator is surrounded by an infinite rigid baffle in the plane. The angle and relative distance correspond to the notation used in Eq. (1) .

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Normalized pressure fields generated by “smooth” pistons modeled by Eq. (10) . (a) The pressure produced by a piston with radius with transition parameter , which closely resembles the field produced by a uniform piston. (b) The field generated by a piston with the same radius .

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

Normalized magnitude spectrum of the “smooth piston” pressure fields displayed in Fig. 2 . In each panel, the nearfield pressure is calculated in a transverse plane at via Eq. (10) followed by a two-dimensional Fourier transform. (a) The magnitude spectrum, displayed on a normalized decibel scale, for a smooth piston with . (b) The spectrum for a smooth piston with . Panel (b) contains significantly less spectral information than (a) due to the wider transition band.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Reference pressure fields for polynomial apodization given by Eq. (11) . (a) The effect of quadratic apodization . (b) Quartic apodization .

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

Pulsed fields generated by smooth pistons with the same parameters used in Fig. 2 . The time evolution for smooth pistons with and are compared. (a) and (b) Normalized pressure fields corresponding to at and , respectively. (c) and (d) Normalized pressure fields corresponding to at and , respectively.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Number of Gauss abscissas vs specified peak error (a) and computation time vs specified peak error (b) for the annular superposition method, the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld integral, and the generalized King integral applied to a parabolic radiator. The annular superposition method achieves 10% peak error with the application of 20 abscissas, the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld approach requires 70 abscissas, and the generalized King integral requires 56 abscissas. Since the computation times are similar for each integral evaluated with the same number of abscissas, (b) demonstrates the present method’s speed advantage compared to the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld approach and the generalized King integral at all error levels considered.


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: An annular superposition integral for axisymmetric radiators