No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners
1.Amitay, S. , Ahissar, M. , and Nelken, I. (2002). “Auditory processing deficits in reading disabled adults,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.1525-3961 3, 302–320.
2.ANSI (1997). “American national standard methods for the calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index,” ANSI S3.5-1997, American National Standards Institute, New York.
3.Bacon, S. P. , Opie, J. M. , and Montoya, D. Y. (1998). “The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.1092-4388 41, 549–563.
4.Baer, T. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1993). “Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 94, 1229–1241.
5.Baer, T. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1994). “Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 95, 2277–2280.
6.Bilger, R. C. , Nuetzel, J. M. , Rabinowitz, W. M. , and Rzeczkowski, C. (1984). “Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise,” J. Speech Hear. Res.0022-4685 27, 32–48.
7.Boothroyd, A. , and Nittrouer, S. (1988). “Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 84, 101–114.
8.Boothroyd, A. , Mulhearn, B. , Gong, J. , and Ostroff, J. (1996). “Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 100, 1807–1818.
9.Divenyi, P. L. , Stark, P. B. , and Haupt, K. M. (2005). “Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 118, 1089–1100.
10.Dubno, J. R. , Ahlstrom, J. B. , and Horwith, A. R. (2000). “Use of context by young and aged adults with normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 107, 538–546.
11.Dubno, J. R. , Horwitz, A. R. , and Ahlstrom, J. B. (2002). “Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 111, 2897–2907.
12.Dubno, J. R. , Horwitz, A. R. , and Ahlstrom, J. B. (2003). “Recovery from prior stimulation: Masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal-hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 113, 2084–2094.
12.Dubno, J. R. , and Schaefer, A. B. (1992). “Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 91, 2110–2121.
13.Duquesnoy, A. J. , and Plomp, R. (1980). “Effect of reverberation and noise on the intelligibility of sentences in cases of presbyacusis,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 68, 537–544.
14.Eisenberg, L. S. , Dirks, D. D. , and Bell, T. S. (1995). “Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing,” J. Speech Hear. Res.0022-4685 38, 222–233.
15.Elliott, L. L. (1995). “Verbal auditory closure and the Speech Perception in Noise (SPIN) test,” J. Speech Hear. Res.0022-4685 38, 1363–1376.
16.Festen, J. M. (1993). “Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 94, 1295–1300.
16.Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1983). “Temporal gap detection in noise as a function of frequency bandwidth, and level,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 74, 67–72.
16.Fitzgibbons, P. J. , and Gordon-Salant, S. (1987). “Temporal gap resolution in listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 81, 133–137.
17.Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1990). “Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal-hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 88, 1725–1736.
18.Gatehouse, S. , Naylor, G. , and Elberling, C. (2003). “Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment,” Int. J. Audiol.1499-2027 42, Suppl. 1: S77–85.
19.George, E. L. J. , Festen, J. M. , and Houtgast, T. (2006). “Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 120, 2295–2311.
20.Gifford, R. H. , and Bacon, S. P. (2005). “Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 118, 3823–3833.
21.Glasberg, B. R. , and Moore, B. C. J. (1989). “Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech,” Scand. Audiol. Suppl.0107-8593 32, 1–25.
23.Glasberg, B. R. , Moore, B. C. J. , and Bacon, S. P. (1987). “Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 81, 1546–1556.
24.Goldstein, E. B. (2002). Sensation and Perception (Wadsworth-Thomson, Pacific Grove, CA).
25.Gordon-Salant, S. (1987). “Age-related differences in speech recognition performance as a function of test format and paradign,” Ear Hear.0196-0202 8, 277–282.
26.Gordon-Salant, S. , and Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1997). “Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.1092-4388 40, 423–431.
27.Gordon-Salant, S. , and Fitzgibbons, P. J. (2004). “Effects of stimulus and noise rate variability on speech perception by younger and older adults,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 115, 1808–1817.
28.Grant, K. W. , and Seitz, P. F. (2000). “The recognition of isolated words and words in sentences: Individual variability in the use of sentence context,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 107, 1000–1011.
29.Grant, K. W. , Walden, B. E. , and Seitz, P. F. (1998). “Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: Consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 103, 2677–2690.
30.Grose, J. H. , Hall, J. W. , and Buss, E. (2001). “Gap duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: Effects of gap and masker duration, frequency separation, and mode of presentation,” J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.1525-3961 2, 388–398.
31.Gustafsson, H. A. , and Arlinger, S. D. (1993). “Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 95, 518–529.
32.Hällgren, M. (2005). “Hearing and cognition in speech comprehension,” Doctoral thesis, Linköping University, Sweden.
33.Hilkhuysen, G. L. M. , Houtgast, T. , and Lyzenga, J. (2005). “Estimating cochlear-filter shapes, temporal-window width and compression from tone-sweep detection in spectral and temporal noise gaps,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 117, 2598–2599.
34.Humes, L. E. (2002). “Factors underlying the speech-recognition performance of elderly hearing-aid wearers,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 112, 1112–1132.
36.International Organization for Standardization (1991). “Acoustics-Standard reference zero for the calibration of pure-tone air conduction audiometers,” ISO 389:1991(E). Available from the American National Standards Institute, New York.
37.Ishihara, S. (1989). The Series of Plates Designed as a Test for Colour Deficiency (Kanehara, Tokyo).
37.Jestead, W. , Bacon, S. P. , and Lehman, J. R. (1982). “Forward masking as a function of frequency, masker level, and signal delay,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 71, 950–962.
38.Kalikow, D. N. , Stevens, K. N. , and Elliott, L. L. (1977). “Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 61, 1337–1351.
39.Kramer, S. E. , Kapteyn, T. S. , Festen, J. M. , and Tobi, H. (1996). “The relationships between self-reported hearing disability and measures of auditory disability,” Audiology0020-6091 35, 277–287.
41.Ludvigsen, C. (1985). “Relations among some psychoacoustic parameters in normal and cochlearly impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 78, 1271–1280.
42.Lunner, T. (2003). “Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use,” Int. J. Audiol.1499-2027 42, Suppl. 1: S49–58.
43.Miller, R. G. (1981). Simultaneous Statistical Inference (Springer, New York).
44.Moore, B. C. J. , Vickers, D. A. , Plack, C. J. , and Oxenham, A. J. (1999). “Inter-relationship between different psycho-acoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 106, 2761–2778.
45.Nabelek, A. K. , and Robinson, P. K. (1982). “Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 71, 1242–1248.
46.Nittrouer, S. , and Boothroyd, A. (1990). “Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 87, 2705–2715.
47.Noordhoek, I. M. , Houtgast, T. , and Festen, J. M. (2001). “Relations between intelligibility of narrow-band speech and auditory functions, both in the frequency region,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 109, 1197–1212.
48.Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York).
50.Patterson, R. D. , Nimmo-Smith, I. , Weber, D. L. , and Milroy, R. (1982). “The deterioration of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 72, 1788–1803.
51.Peters, R. W. , Moore, B. C. J. , and Baer, T. (1998). “Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 103, 577–587.
52.Pichora-Fuller, M. K. , Schneider, B. A. , and Daneman, M. (1995). “How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 97, 593–608.
53.Pichora-Fuller, M. K. , and Souza, P. E. (2003). “Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech,” Int. J. Audiol.1499-2027 42, 2S11–2S16.
54.Plomp, R. (1978). “Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 63, 533–549.
55.Plomp, R. , and Mimpen, A. M. (1979). “Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences,” Audiology0020-6091 18, 43–52.
56.Rhebergen, K. S. , and Versfeld, N. J. (2005). “A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 117, 2181–2192.
58.Snell, K. B. , Mapes, F. M. , Hickman, E. D. , and Frisina, D. R. (2002). “Word recognition in competing babble and the effects of age, temporal processing, and absolute sensitivity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 112, 720–727.
59.Snodgrass, J. G. , and Kinjo, H. (1998). “On the generality of the perceptual closure effect,” J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.0278-7393 24, 645–658.
59.Sommers, M. S. , and Humes, L. E. (1993a). “Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal and elderly listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 93, 2903–2914.
59.Sommers, M. S. , and Humes, L. E. (1993b). “Erratum: Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal and elderly listeners [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2903-2914 (1993)],” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 94, 2449–2450.
60.Souza, P. E. , and Turner, C. W. (1994). “Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss,” J. Speech Hear. Res.0022-4685 37, 655–661.
61.Stephens, S. D. G. (1976). “The input for a damaged cochlea—A brief review,” Br. J. Audiol.0300-5364 10, 97–101.
62.Studebaker, G. A. , Sherbecoe, R. L. , McDaniel, D. M. , and Gwaltney, C. A. (1999). “Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 105, 2431–2444.
63.Summers, V. , and Molis, M. R. (2004). “Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: Effects of hearing loss and presentation level,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.1092-4388 47, 245–256.
64.Ter Keurs, M. , Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1993a). “Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 93, 1547–1552.
65.Ter Keurs, M. , Festen, J. M. , and Plomp, R. (1993b). “Limited resolution of spectral contrast and hearing loss for speech in noise,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 94, 1307–1314.
66.Van Rooij, J. C. G. M. , and Plomp, R. (1990). “Auditory and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. II. Multivariate analysis,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 88, 2611–2624.
67.Van Rooij, J. C. G. M. , and Plomp, R. (1992). “Auditory and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. III. Additional data and final discussion,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 91, 1028–1033.
68.Van Rooij, J. C. G. M. , Plomp, R. , and Orlebeke, J. F. (1989). “Auditory and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. I. Development of test battery,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 86, 1294–1309.
69.Van Wijngaarden, S. J. , Bronkhorst, A. W. , Houtgast, T. , and Steeneken, H. J. (2004). “Using the Speech Transmission Index for predicting non-native speech intelligibility,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 115, 1281–1291.
70.Van Wijngaarden, S. J. , Steeneken, H. J. , and Houtgast, T. (2002). “Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 111, 1906–1916.
71.Versfeld, N. J. , Daalder, L. , Festen, J. M. , and Houtgast, T. (2000). “Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of speech reception threshold,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 107, 1671–1684.
73.Watson, C. S. , Qiu, W. W. , Chamberlain, M. M. , and Li, X. (1996). “Auditory and visual speech perception: Confirmation of a modality-independent source of individual differences in speech recognition,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 100, 1153–1162.
74.Zekveld, A. A. , George, E. L. J. , Kramer, S. E. , Goverts, S. T. , and Houtgast, T. (2007). “The development of the Text Reception Threshold test: A visual analogue of the Speech Reception Threshold test,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.1092-4388 (to be published).
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month