No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Time course of speech changes in response to unanticipated short-term changes in hearing state
1.Black, J. (1951). “The effect of noise-induced temporary deafness upon vocal intensity,” Speech Monographs 18, 74–77.
2.Blamey, P. J. , Dowell, R. C. , Brown, A. M. , Clark, G. M. , and Seligman, P. M. (1987). “Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 82, 48–57.
3.Bond, Z. S. , Moore, T. J. , and Gable, B. (1989). “Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced in noise and while wearing an oxygen mask,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 85, 907–912.
5.Burnett, T. A. , Freedland, M. B. , Larson, C. R. , and Hain, T. C. (1998). “Voice responses to manipulations in pitch feedback,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 103, 3153–3161.
6.Clark, J. E. , Lubker, J. F. , and Hunnicutt, S. (1987). “Some preliminary evidence for phonetic adjustment strategies in communication difficulty,” in Language Topics: Essays in Honor of Michael Halliday, R. Steele and T. Threadgold, eds., pp. 161–180 (Benjamins, Amsterdam).
7.Cowie, R. I. D. , and Douglas-Cowie, E. (1983). “Speech production in profound postilingual deafness,” in Hearing Science and Hearing Disorders, M. Lutman and M. P. Haggard, eds., pp. 183–230. (Academic, London).
8.Draegert, G. L. (1951). “Relationships between voice variables and speech intelligibility in high level noise,” Speech Monographs 18, 272–278.
10.Forrest, K. , Weismer, G. , Milenkovic, P. , and Dougall, R. N. (1988). “Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: Preliminary data,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 84, 115–123.
11.Guenther, F. H. , Ghosh, S. S. , and Tourville, J. A. (2006). “Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production,” Brain Lang0093-934X 96, 280–301.
12.Hain, T. C. , Burnett, T. A. , Kiran, S. , Larson, C. R. , Singh, S. , and Kenney, M. K. (2000). “Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex,” Exp. Brain Res.0014-4819 130, 133–141.
13.Hanley, T. D. , and Steer, M. D. (1949). “Effect of level of distracting noise upon speaking rate, duration and intensity,” J. Speech Hear Disord.0022-4677 14, 363–368.
16.Jones, J. J. , and Munhall, K. G. (2002). “The role of auditory feedback during phonation: Studies of Mandarin tone production,” J. Phonetics0095-4470 30, 303–320.
17.Jongman, A. , Wayland, R. , and Wong, S. (2000). “Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 108, 1252–1263.
18.Kawahara, H. , and Williams, J. C. (1996). “Effects of auditory feedback on voice pitch trajectories: Characteristic responses to pitch perturbations,” in Vocal Fold Physiology, P. J. Davis and N. H. Fletcher, eds., pp. 263–278 (Singular, San Diego).
19.Kishon-Rabin, L. , Taitelbaum, R. , Tobin, Y. , and Hildesheimer, M. (1999). “The effect of partially restored hearing on speech production of postlingually deafened adults with multichannel cochlear implants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 106, 2843–2857.
20.Lane, H. , Denny, M. , Guenther, F. H. , Matthies, M. , Ménard, L. , Perkell, J. , Stockmann, E. , Tiede, M. , Vick, J. , and Zandipour, M. (2005). “Effects of bite blocks and hearing status on vowel production,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 118, 1636–1646.
21.Lane, H. , Matthies, M. , Denny, M. , Guenther, F. , Perkell, J. , Stockmann, E. , Tiede, M. , Vick, J. , and Zandipour, M. (in press, 2007). “Effects of short- and long-term changes in auditory feedback on vowel and sibilant contrasts,” J. Speech, Lang. Hear. Res.
22.Lane, H. , Matthies, M. , Perkell, J. , Vick, J. , and Zandipour, M. (2001). “The effects of changes in hearing status in cochlear implant users on the acoustic vowel space and CV coarticulation,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.1092-4388 44, 552–563.
23.Lane, H. , Tranel, B. , and Sisson, C. (1970). “Regulation of voice communication by sensory dynamics,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 47, 618–624.
24.Lane, H. , and Tranel, B. (1971). “The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech,” J. Speech Hear. Res.0022-4685 14, 677–709.
25.Lane, H. , and Webster, J. W. (1991). “Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 89, 859–866.
26.Lindblom, B. E. F. (1990). “Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory,” in Speech Production and Speech Modeling, pp. 403–439 (Kluwer, Dordrecht).
27.Markel, J. D. , and Gray, A. H. (1976). Linear Prediction of Speech (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
28.Matthies, M. L. , Svirsky, M. A. , Lane, H. L. , and Perkell, J. S. (1994). “A preliminary study of the effects of cochlear implants on the production of sibilants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 96, 1367–1373.
29.Matthies, M. L. , Svirsky, M. , Perkell, J. , and Lane, H. (1996). “Acoustic and articulatory measures of sibilant production with and without auditory feedback from a cochlear implant,” J. Speech Hear. Res.0022-4685 39, 936–946.
30.McKay, C. M. , and McDermott, H. J. (1993). “Perceptual performance of subjects with cochlear implants using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the Mini Speech Processor (MSP),” Ear Hear.0196-0202 14, 350–367.
31.Natke, U. , and Kalveram, K. T. (2001). “Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.1092-4388 44, 577–584.
32.Perkell, J. S. , Denny, M. , Lane, H. , Guenther, F. H. , Matthies, M. L. , Tiede, M. , Vick, J. , Zandipour, M. , and Burton, E. (2007). “Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 121, 505–514.
33.Perkell, J. , Lane, H. , Svirsky, M. , and Webster, J. (1992). “Speech of cochlear implant patients: A longitudinal study of vowel production,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 91, 2961–2978.
34.Perkell, J. , Numa, W. , Vick, J. , Lane, H. , Balkany, T. , and Gould, J. (2001). “Language-specific, hearing-related changes in vowel spaces: A preliminary study of English- and Spanish-speaking cochlear implant users,” Ear Hear.0196-0202 22, 461–470.
35.Peters, R. W. (1955). “The effect of filtering of sidetone on speaker intelligibility,” J. Speech Hear Disord.0022-4677 20, 371–375.
36.Pick, H. L. , Jr., Siegel, G. M. , Fox, P. W. , Garber, S. R. , and Kearney, J. K. (1989). “Inhibiting the Lombard effect,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 85, 894–900.
37.Purcell, D. W. , and Munhall, K. G. (2006a). “Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 119, 2288–2297.
37.Purcell, D. W. and Munhall, K. G. (2006b). “Adaptive control of vowel formant frequency: Evidence from real-time formant manipulation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 120, 966–977.
38.Stevens, K. N. , Nickerson, R. S. , and Rollins, A. M. (1983). “Suprasegmental and postural aspects of speech production and their effect on articulatory skills and intelligibility,” in Speech of the Hearing-Impaired, pp. 35–51 (University Park Press, Baltimore).
39.Svirsky, M. A. , Lane, H. , Perkell, J. S. , and Wozniak, J. (1992). “Effects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 92, 1284–1300.
40.Tartter, V. C. , Gomes, H. , and Litwin, E. (1993). “Some acoustic effects of listening to noise on speech production,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 94, 2437–2440.
41.Tourville, J. A. , Guenther, F. H. , Ghosh, S. S. , Reilly, K. J. , Bohland, J. W. , and Nieto-Castanon, A. (2005). “Effects of acoustic and articulatory perturbation on cortical activity during speech production,” in 11th Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping, Toronto, June 12-16, p. S49.
42.Van Summers, W. , Pisoni, D. B. , Bernacki, R. H. , Pedlow, R. I. , and Stokes, M. A. (1988). “Effect of noise on speech production: Acoustic and perceptual analyses,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 84, 917–928.
43.Villacorta, V. , Perkell, J. S. , and Guenther, F. H. (2004). “Sensorimotor adaptation to acoustic perturbations in vowel formants,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 115, 2430(A).
44.Villacorta, V. , Perkell, J. S. , and Guenther, F. H. (2005). “Relations between speech sensorimotor adaptation and perceptual acuity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 117, 2618–2619(A).
45.Waldstein, R. S. (1990). “Effects of postlingual deafness on speech production: Implications for the role of auditory feedback,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 88, 2099–2114.
47.Wilson, B. , Lawson, D. , Zerbi, M. , Finley, C. , and Wolford, R. (1995). “New Processing Strategies in Cochlear Implantation,” Am. J. Otol.0192-9763 16, 669–681
46.Xu, Y. , Larson, C. R. , Bauer, J. J. , and Hain, T. C. (2004). “Compensation for pitch-shifted auditory feedback during the production of Mandarin tone sequences,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 116, 1168–1178.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month