No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Interactions of speaking condition and auditory feedback on vowel production in postlingually deaf adults with cochlear implantsa)
1.Buechner, A. , Frohne-Buechner, C. , Stoever, T. , Gaertner, L. , Battmer, R. D. , and Lenarz, T. (2005). “Comparison of a paired or sequential stimulation paradigm with Advanced Bionics’ high-resolution mode,” Otol. Neurotol.1531-7129 26, 941–947.
2.Chen, F. R. (1980). “Acoustic characteristics and intelligibility of clear and conversational speech,” Master’s project, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
3.Economou, A. , Tartter, V. , Chute, P. , and Hellman, S. (1992). “Speech changes following reimplantation from a single-channel to a multichannel cochlear implant,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 92, 1310–1323.
5.Ferguson, S. H. , and Kewley-Port, D. (2002). “Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 112, 259–271.
6.Guenther, F. H. (1995). “Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production,” Psychoanal. Rev.0033-2836 102, 594–621.
7.Guenther, F. H. , Hampson, M. , and Johnson, D. (1998). “A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements,” Psychoanal. Rev.0033-2836 105, 611–633.
8.Guenther, F. H. , Ghosh, S. S. , and Tourville, J. A. (2006). “Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production,” Brain Lang0093-934X 96, 280–301.
9.Krause, J. C. , and Braida, L. D. (2004). “Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 115, 362–378.
10.Lane, H. , Matthies, M. , Denny, M. , Guenther, F. , Perkell, J. , Stockmann, E. , Tiede, M. , Vick, J. , and Zandipour, M. (2007). “Effects of short- and long-term changes in auditory feedback on vowel and sibilant contrasts,” J. Speech, Lang. and Hear. Res. (in press).
11.Lane, H. , Denny, M. , Guenther, F. , Matthies, M. , Menard, L. , Perkell, J. , Stockman, E. , Tiede, M. , Vick, J. , and Zandipour, M. (2005). “Effects of bite blocks and hearing status on vowel production,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 118, 1636–1646.
12.Lane, H. , Matthies, M. , Perkell, J. , Vick, J. , and Zandipour, M. (2001). “The effects of changes in hearing status in cochlear implant users on the acoustic vowel space and CV coarticulation,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.1092-438844, 552–563.
13.Lane, H. , Wozniak, J. , Matthies, M. , Svirsky, M. , and Perkell, J. (1995). “Phonemic resetting vs. postural adjustments in the speech of cochlear implant users: An exploration of voice-onset time,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 98, 3096–3106.
14.Langereis, M. C. , Bosman, A. J. , Van Olphen, A. F. , and Smoorenburg, G. F. (1998). “Changes in speech production in post-linguistically deafened adults after cochlear implantation,” Clin. Otolaryngol. 23, 383.
15.Lindblom, B. (1990). “Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H and H is theory,” in Speech Production and Speech Modeling, edited by W. J. Hardcastle and A. Marchal (Kluwer, Dordrecht), pp. 403–439.
16.Liu, S. , Rio, E. D. , Bradlow, A. R. , and Zeng, F.-G. (2004). “Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 116, 2374–2383.
17.Moon, S.-J. (1991). “An acoustic and perceptual study of undershoot in clear and citation-form speech,” Phonetic Experimental Research at the Institute of Linguistics University of Stockholm XIV, University of Stockholm, Institute of Linguistics, 153–156.
18.Moon, S.-J. , and Lindblom, B. (1994). “Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 96, 40–55.
20.Payton, K. L. , Uchanski, R. M. , and Braida, L. D. (1994). “Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 95, 1581–1592.
21.Perkell, J. S. , Denny, M. , Lane, H. , Guenther, F. H. , Matthies, M. L. , Tiede, M. , Vick, J. , Zandipour, M. , and Burton, E. (2007). “Effects of masking noise on vowel and sibilant contrasts in normal-hearing speakers and postlingually deafened cochlear implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 121, 505–518.
22.Perkell, J. S. , Guenther, F. H. , Lane, H. , Matthies, M. L. , Stockmann, E. , Tiede, M. , and Zandipour, M. (2004a). “The distinctness of speakers’ productions of vowel contrasts is related to their discrimination of the contrasts,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 116, 2338–2344.
23.Perkell, J. S. , Matthies, M. L. , Tiede, M. , Lane, H. , Zandipour, M. , Marrone, N. , Stockmann, E. , and Guenther, F. H. (2004b). The distinctness of speakers’ contrast is related to their auditory discrimination and use of an articulatory saturation effect, J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.1092-4388 47, 1259–1269.
25.Perkell, J. , Numa, W. , Vick, J. , Lane, H. , Balkany, T. , and Gould, J. (2001). “Language-specific, hearing-related changes in vowel spaces: A preliminary study of English- and Spanish-speaking cochlear implant users,” Ear Hear.0196-0202 22, 461–470.
26.Perkell, J. S. , Guenther, F. H. , Lane, H. , Matthies, M. , Perrier, P. , Vick, J. , Wilhelms-Tricarico, R. , and Zandipour, M. (2000). “A theory of speech motor control and supporting data from speakers with normal hearing and with profound hearing loss,” J. Phonetics0095-4470 28, 233–272.
27.Picheny, M. A. , Durlach, N. I. , and Braida, L. D. (1986). “Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech,” J. Speech Hear. Res.0022-4685 29, 434–436.
28.Picheny, M. A. , Durlach, N. I. , and Braida, L. D. (1985). “Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech,” J. Speech Hear. Res.0022-4685 28, 96–103.
30.Schenk, B. S. , Baumgartner, W. D. , and Hamzavi, J. S. (2003). “Changes in vowel quality after cochlear implantation,” ORL0301-156965, 184–188.
31.Smyth, V. , Murdoch, B. , McCormack, P. , and Marshall, I. (1991). “Objective and subjective evaluation of subjects fitted with the cochlear multichannel prostheses: 3 studies,” Austral. J. Hum. Comm. Dis. 9, 31–52.
32.Svirsky, M. , Lane, H. , Perkell, J. , and Webster, J. (1992). “Speech of cochlear implant patients: Results of a short-term auditory deprivation study,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 92, 1284–1300.
33.Svirsky, M. A. , and Tobey, E. A. (1991). “Effect of different types of auditory stimulation on vowel formant frequencies in multichannel cochlear implant users,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 89, 2895–2904.
34.Tyler, R. S. , Parkinson, A. J. , Woodworth, G. G. , Lowder, M. W. , and Gantz, B. J. (1997). “Performance over time of adult patients using the Ineraid or Nucleus cochlear implant,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 102, 508–522.
35.Vandali, A. E. , Whitford, L. A. , Plant, K. L. , and Clark, G. M. (2000). “Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: Using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system,” Ear Hear.0196-0202 21 608–624.
36.Vick, J. , Lane, H. , Perkell, J. , Gould, J. , and Zandipour, M. (2001). “Covariation of cochlear implant users’ perception and production of vowel contrasts and their identification by listeners with normal hearing,” J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res.1092-4388 44, 1257–1267.
37.Villacorta, V. , Perkell, J. S. , and Guenther, F. H. (2005). “Relations between speech sensorimotor adaptation and perceptual acuity,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am.0001-4966 117, 2618–2619.
Article metrics loading...
Full text loading...
Most read this month