1887
banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
oa
An introduction to induced loudness reduction
Rent:
Rent this article for
Access full text Article
/content/asa/journal/jasa/122/3/10.1121/1.2761922
1.
1.Arieh, Y. , Kelly, K. , and Marks, L. E. (2005). “Tracking the time to recovery after induced loudness reduction (L),” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 33813384.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1898103
2.
2.Arieh, Y. , and Marks, L. E. (2001). “Recalibration of loudness: Sensory vs. decisional processes,” in Fechner Day 2001, edited by E. Sommerfeld, R. Kompass, and T. Lachmann (Pabst, Berlin).
3.
3.Arieh, Y. , and Marks, L. E. (2003). “Time course of loudness recalibration: Implications for loudness enhancement,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 15501556.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1603768
4.
4.Braida, L. D. , and Durlach, N. I. (1972). “Intensity perception. II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 483502.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1912868
5.
5.Buus, S. , Florentine, M. , Poulsen, T. , and Müsch, H. (1999). “On the relation between peripheral compression and the growth of loudness,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 1022.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.424892
6.
6.Epstein, M. , and Florentine, M. (2005). “A test of the equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis using cross-modality matching functions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 907913.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1954547
7.
7.Epstein, M. , and Gifford, E. (2006). “A potential carry-over effect in the measurement of induced loudness reduction,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 305309.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2202867
8.
8.Florentine, M. , and Epstein, M. (2006). “To honor Stevens and repeal his law (for the auditory system),” in Fechner Day, edited by D. E. Kornbrot, R. M. Msetfi, and A. W. MacRae (International Society for Psychophysics, St. Albans, UK).
9.
9.Hellman, R. P. , and Zwislocki, J. J. (1963). “Monaural loudness function at and interaural summation,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 35, 856865.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1918619
10.
10.Mapes-Riordan, D. , and Yost, W. A. (1997). “Loudness recalibration as a function of recalibration and comparison tone level,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101, 3170.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.419133
11.
11.Mapes-Riordan, D. , and Yost, W. A. (1998). “Temporal properties of loudness recalibration,” Proc. 16th International Congress on Acoustics, Seattle, WA, pp. 23612362.
12.
12.Mapes-Riordan, D. , and Yost, W. A. (1999). “Loudness recalibration as a function of level,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 35063511.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.428203
13.
13.Marks, L. E. (1992). “The slippery context effect in psychophysics: Intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua,” Percept. Psychophys. 51, 187198.
14.
14.Marks, L. E. (1994). “‘Recalibrating’ the auditory system: The perception of loudness,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20, 382396.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.20.2.382
15.
15.Marks, L. E. , and Warner, E. (1991). “Slippery context effect and critical bands,” J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 17, 986996.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.17.4.986
16.
16.Marozeau, J. , Epstein, M. , Florentine, M. , and Ioffe, S. (2006). “Loudness reduction caused by a tone at a different frequency,” American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), Miami, FL.
17.
17.Moore, B. C. , and Glasberg, B. R. (1987). “Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level, and their use in calculating excitation patterns,” Hear. Res. 28, 209225.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(87)90050-5
18.
18.Nieder, B. , Buus, S. , Cazals, Y. , and Scharf, B. (2007). “Loudness reduction induced by a contralateral tone,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 3537.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2735107
19.
19.Nieder, B. , Buus, S. , Florentine, M. , and Scharf, B. (2003). “Interactions between test- and inducer-tone durations in induced loudness reduction,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 28462855.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1616580
20.
20.Oberfeld, D. (2007). “Loudness changes induced by a proximal sound: Loudness enhancement, loudness recalibration, or both?,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121, 21372148.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2710433
21.
21.Parker, S. , and Schneider, B. (1994). “The stimulus range effect: Evidence for top-down control of sensory intensity in audition,” Percept. Psychophys. 56, 111.
22.
22.Scharf, B. , Buus, S. , and Nieder, B. (2002). “Loudness enhancement: Induced loudness reduction in disguise? (L),” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 807810.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1500755
23.
23.Schneider, B. , and Parker, S. (1990). “Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments,” Percept. Psychophys. 48, 409418.
24.
24.Silva, I. , and Florentine, M. (2006). “Effect of adaptive psychophysical procedure on loudness matches,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 21242131.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2336747
25.
25.Suzuki, Y. , and Takeshima, H. (2004). “Equal-loudness-level contours for pure tones,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 116, 918933.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.1763601
26.
26.Wagner, E. , and Scharf, B. (2006). “Induced loudness reduction as a function of exposure time and signal frequency,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 10121020.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2159430
27.
27.Ward, L. M. , Armstrong, J. , and Golestani, N. (1996). “Intensity resolution and subjective magnitude in psychophysical scaling,” Percept. Psychophys. 58, 793801.
28.
28.Zwicker, E. , and Fastl, H. (1990). Psychoacoustics—Facts and Models (Springer, Berlin).
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/122/3/10.1121/1.2761922
Loading
/content/asa/journal/jasa/122/3/10.1121/1.2761922
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/asa/journal/jasa/122/3/10.1121/1.2761922
2007-08-21
2014-11-27

Abstract

Induced loudness reduction (ILR) is a phenomenon by which a preceding higher-level tone (an inducer tone) reduces the loudness of a lower-level tone (a test tone). The strength of this effect depends on a number of parameters, reviewed here. Some of the implications of ILR on loudness data are presented via the analysis of several studies in which ILR likely resulted in otherwise unexplained biases in data sets. These results serve as examples of the pervasiveness of ILR in loudnessmeasurements and indicate that it is necessary to consider ILR when designing any psychoacousticalexperiment in which level varies.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/asa/journal/jasa/122/3/1.2761922.html;jsessionid=10vjm5qpuxvd.x-aip-live-03?itemId=/content/asa/journal/jasa/122/3/10.1121/1.2761922&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah&containerItemId=content/asa/journal/jasa
true
true
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: An introduction to induced loudness reduction
http://aip.metastore.ingenta.com/content/asa/journal/jasa/122/3/10.1121/1.2761922
10.1121/1.2761922
SEARCH_EXPAND_ITEM