banner image
No data available.
Please log in to see this content.
You have no subscription access to this content.
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
Acoustic diffraction by deformed edges of finite length: Theory and experimenta)
a)Publication of this paper was delayed by request of author so that it would appear in the same issue with “Higher-order acoustic diffraction by edges of finite thickness” by Dezhang Chu, Timothy K. Stanton, and Allan D. Pierce.
Rent this article for
View: Figures


Image of FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.

Deformed truncated wedge of finite length.

Image of FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.

Diffraction geometry for disk (backscattering). The source/receiver and disk are in the and planes, respectively.

Image of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.

(Color online) Diffracted echo in backscatter direction from infinitely long, impenetrable straight knife-edge (upper) compared with diffraction in backscatter direction by the leading edge of thin, impenetrable disks (lower). Since the diffracted field spreads differently for the infinitely long edge and the disks, the plots are on arbitrary scales for comparison. The frequency is for all predictions and the diameters of the disks are 8 and . The same (exact) expression for [Eq. (18)] was used to produce the upper plot as it was in the lower plots [once integrated through use of Eqs. (15) and (16) to give Eq. (19)], as well as in Fig. 5. The angle is normal incidence to flat surface of disk and half-plane associated with the infinite knife-edge, while corresponds to edge-on incidence.

Image of FIG. 4.
FIG. 4.

Impulse response in backscatter direction for -diameter thin disk as calculated with the T-matrix method. Normal incidence is 0° and edge-on incidence is 90°. The calculations were over the range 2.5–87.5°. The color scale is in decibels relative to the maximum value of the entire plot. The time delay of corresponds to the center of the disk.

Image of FIG. 5.
FIG. 5.

(Color online) Comparisons between T-matrix and deformed-edge calculations for thin, impenetrable disks of diameters (upper) and (lower). The partial wave target strength (PWTS) of the diffraction by leading edge only is calculated in each case. As in Fig. 3, Eq. (19) was used for the deformed edge calculations, based on an exact solution to the infinite knife-edge. The leading edge echo was numerically separated from the trailing edge echo in the impulse response time series in the T-matrix calculations, although there was difficulty resolving the two echoes (hence resulting in some contamination) for angles below about 20°. All calculations involved for later comparison with the laboratory data.

Image of FIG. 6.
FIG. 6.

Temporally compressed echo measured in backscatter direction versus orientation for -diameter aluminum disk submerged in water. The disk is thick. Normal incidence echoes (at , 180°, and 360°), leading and trailing double-edge echoes, and circumnavigated echoes are resolved. The circumnavigated waves occur at approximately after the trailing edge echoes. Other echoes arrive near the circumnavigated echoes and are out of the scope of this analysis. The color scale is in decibels relative to the maximum value of the entire plot. Apparent echoes at normal incidence arriving at negative time delays are actually processing sidelobes from the large zero-time-delay echoes. The abbreviated terminology “leading edge” and “trailing edge” correspond to the more rigorous description “leading double edge” and “trailing double edge.” From Stanton and Chu (2004).

Image of FIG. 7.
FIG. 7.

Partial wave target strength (PWTS) of leading double-edge diffracted echo versus orientation angle for aluminum disks of various diameters. Predictions are given by the solid lines and laboratory data are given by the “+.” The diameters of the disks range from , each with a thickness of . The 0° angle corresponds to normal incidence to the flat surface of the disks, while 90° corresponds to edge-on incidence. The angle is illustrated in Fig. 2. The predictions are based on a formulation from Chu et al. (2007) that describes the diffraction by an impenetrable infinitely long, straight double edge. That formula is incorporated into the deformed edge line integral in this paper.

Image of FIG. 8.
FIG. 8.

PWTS of leading double-edge echo versus diameter of aluminum disk at and for three orientation angles. Model predictions are given by the solid lines and laboratory data are given by the “+.” The thickness of the disks is . The angle is illustrated in Fig. 2. The predictions use the same model (impenetrable deformed double edge) as in Fig. 7. The data for the 90° angle follow the trend of varying by , as predicted by the deformed edge model, over the entire range of diameters.


Article metrics loading...


Full text loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
752b84549af89a08dbdd7fdb8b9568b5 journal.articlezxybnytfddd
Scitation: Acoustic diffraction by deformed edges of finite length: Theory and experimenta)